Connect with us

Opinions

[OPINION] Do You Know Your Political Love Language?

Published

on

OPINION (FNN NEWS) – There have been many books written on helping us define and articulate what makes us tick. Those nuances and hot buttons that make us satisfied individually and in relationships. Things that we love. So it occurred to me: throughout my career in politics, I had never taken the time to break down the love languages of politics. Moreover, most of us don’t even realize there are categories that we fall into and often it’s our failure to know how we fit in that can either make or break our roles in politics.

 

DO YOU KNOW YOUR POLITICAL LOVE LANGUAGE?

The various grassroots categories we fall into are relatively straightforward. Some are fundraising skills, direct interaction like phone calls or door knocking, or less measurable components like social media and sign waving. I’d argue that each has value in its own right. Often, however, some are perceived to have more influence than others. The key is to identify what your strengths are and reward yourself by working in the areas that are best suited to your skill set and resources. I can’t tell you how many people tell me they don’t like to make phone calls or knock on doors. However, that doesn’t mean there isn’t a place for just about everyone in a political movement. Let’s explore your political love language.

PHONE BANKERS
Obviously, most midterm and Presidential election cycles open larger scale offices with traditional phone lines used by the volunteers. However, with today’s technology, gone are the days of having to make phone calls in a campaign office. Today you can actually be assigned access, utilizing your own phone, that allows you to log in and make calls from the comfort of your own home. This convenience, however, isn’t for the unfocused or passive volunteer. It’s very easy to let the distraction of the dryer bell or dog barking interfere with your focus and, thereby, interfere with productivity. If you are going to make calls from home, I suggest you do so in smaller groups and turn the experience into a team-building exercise with contest and prizes. This approach also reduces the stress level that comes along with making phone calls to begin with and should yield happier, more inspired experiences for the volunteers.

DOOR KNOCKERS
Many experienced campaign volunteers and staff will tell you there’s no better type of interaction to engage a voter than face to face. Certainly, there are many truths to this assertion. A few tips: Don’t be afraid to work your own precinct versus taking on areas of town you are not familiar with. Once you’ve mastered your own precinct, you’ll have a far greater comfort level to reach into other precincts that are outside of your comfort zone. It’s always easier to say, “Hi, I’m your neighbor down the street,” than it is to be in a neighborhood you know nothing about. However, just know that reaching outside your comfort zone is where true results are often gained.

CHECK WRITERS
There’s no secret that those who write checks to campaigns are greatly sought after. For some, the idea of simply writing a check is much easier than engaging in other forms of the political process. Other check writers become actively engaged.

FUNDRAISERS
Not all people skilled at fundraising have money to donate to campaigns. Some simply know how to host or organize social gatherings or have a comfort level reaching out to resources to donate to campaigns. If you choose to be part of the fundraising effort, make sure you work with the campaign staff so that collectively, you can come to an agreement that offsets your work with your participation in a fundraising event. Meaning, do nothing for free. Either agree to a percentage of what you raise or barter your help with access to the fundraising event you help produce.

SOCIAL BUTTERFLIES
Social butterflies often are everywhere, but really aren’t part of any one particular part of the political engagement process. But, don’t worry butterflies, you are needed too. Often events simply need more people in attendance so that opposition pays closer attention to the number of people at an event versus the actual role of any butterfly in particular.

SOCIAL MEDIA WARRIORS
If you’re involved in any of the various social media platforms like Facebook or Twitter, you’re probably all too familiar with social media or “keyboard” warriors. Some people offer their opinions with little to no concern for the recourse from their statements. However, there is a positive, much-needed impact for campaigns and political parties that comes from those who can spin and engage in social media. It comes down to ensuring that true and accurate information is being shared in a constructive and informative way.

SIGN WAVERS
I believe sign wavers get a bad rap. Someone might be good at sign waving, but not necessarily be strong at fundraising, phone calling or knocking on doors. Sign waving is not effective in the beginning of a campaign and most likely won’t impact early or election day voting. However, perception is reality. If the general public is being touched by mail, phone, door knocking–and yes, sign waving–collectively, it will provide the campaign an overall perception of being larger and more diverse. Meaning, sign waving can’t hurt.

No matter what your political love language is, know that it takes an army of different types of soldiers to win a war. Politics is a blood sport and certainly not for the faint-hearted or fragile. That said, fundraising and direct engagement with voters will always prevail as the preferred methods of support and interaction. But, there are enough options to give everyone a valued way to engage in the political process.

__________________________________________________

Randy Ross is a political contributor for Florida National News. | social@floridanationalnews.com

Continue Reading
3 Comments

3 Comments

  1. Kat Gates-Skipper, Marine Corps Vet/Veterans Advocate

    November 20, 2018 at 7:32 pm

    That was a very, very good article.
    Thanks, Randy, for taking the time to break down each of those areas. As one can see, each role is just as important as the next.
    And….Happy Thanksgiving

  2. tricia dennis

    November 20, 2018 at 7:33 pm

    Put me under sign waver and social butterfly
    Love ya Mr. Ross

  3. Cree

    November 20, 2018 at 7:36 pm

    Excellent article! This is a very creative and categorical way of defining the areas of political engagement.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Opinions

[OPINION] The Pro-Life Party is Now Targeting Children

Published

on

George Washington University's Kye Allums competing at the BankUnited Center against the University of Miami Women's Basketball Team on December 28th, 2010. Photo via the Miami Herald.

ORLANDO, Fla. (FNN) – Despite the current host of urgent issues plaguing America, Florida Republicans (and the national Republican Party) have chosen to focus their efforts on curbing civil liberties for historically underprivileged minority groups.

We’re grappling with the substantial increase in chronic homelessness, Florida being the fourth most uninsured state in the nation, an uptick in racist attacks against AAPI and other marginalized minority groups, and a rise in white supremacy.

And they are getting away with it.

Aside from the excessive voter suppression laws and anti-protest laws that give little regard for the first amendment or fifteenth amendment to the United States Constitution, Florida Republicans waited until the last minute of their retaliatory legislative session ending in the last week of April to strike a blow against school children who identify as trans, particularly trans girls.

One of the fiercest proponents of the bill, Senator Kelli Stargel (R – Polk County), has tried to frame the language of the bill around equality, arguing that girls’ sports should not be open to “male students” and competitors should have “equal” genetic dispositions. Senator Stargel has faced opposition not only from Democrats, but from her own daughter. Laura Stargel, a climate activist, wrote an op-ed reasoning with Florida Governor Ron DeSantis to veto the transphobic legislation, at one point stating:

“This legislation relies on birth certificates at the time of the player’s birth to determine the gender-assigned team. The policy is rooted in a false stereotype of girls being unable to compete against boys. It oversimplifies sex-neutral characteristics such as skill, weight, height, strength and/or testosterone level, and the tremendous variation in athleticism within the sexes; variation that has produced incredible female athletes like Serena Williams and Simone Biles.”

The legislation has caused a series of disagreements about whether trans kids should be forced to sit out on sports or a league of their own must be instituted. In fact, neither should be the case. Transgender individuals playing sports has been a non-issue and Republicans are attempting to spark a so-called culture war.

Unfortunately, there is a grey area: One side of this culture war is completely misinformed. According to Dr. Eric Vilain, Molecular Geneticist at George Washington University in conjunction with NPR, people born with XY chromosomes often perform 10% to 12% better than those with XX chromosomes due to testosterone and that is typically presented in a small number of athletic competitions such as 400 meter runs and hand-tossing.

The difference between athletes is even smaller for Florida’s target, which are little kids. Before the age of 13, there are very minimal differences in athletic competition between those born with XY chromosomes and those born with XX chromosomes.

Without even counting the significant changes that transgender individuals go through when taking hormone-blockers – which lowers bone density, making them weaker – there are natural advantages in certain sports that far outweigh the average differences between those with XY chromosomes and XX chromosomes. To deny the significance of training, other differences would have to be made in regards to athletic competitions if legislators want to lock transgender women out or make them separate but equal by promoting a league of their own. Taller individuals have an advantage over shorter individuals when playing basketball or volleyball and shorter individuals have an advantage over taller individuals when ice skating or rock climbing, therefore, it would only be “fair” to exclude certain people from those sports as well. Instead, people appreciate the diversity between athletes.

Furthermore, such blatant legislation will only increase discrimination against transgender individuals, especially in women’s sports where many women are already targeted for the way they look or the way their body is built.

Florida is one of the fastest growing states in the country, and it is truly unfortunate to see Florida Republicans taking significant steps to curb civil liberties and rights, especially now targeting those they frequently toss into speeches about protecting. The Republican Party is no longer the conservative party of the past built on fiscal responsibility or so-called family values–they are a reactionary party grounded on conspiracy theories and social discrimination.

I urge readers to take the NCAA’s word on this: transgender individuals in sports is a non-issue. Stand with those who are transgender and defend every child’s right to play the sport that they love while learning how to work with a team and improve themselves physically and mentally.

__________________________________________________________

Orange Soil & Water Conservation District Supervisor Nate Douglas is a Florida National News contributor. He was the youngest person elected to public office in the state of Florida during the 2020 election is currently Vice Chair on the Orange Soil & Water Conservation District board. | info@floridanationalnews.com

Continue Reading

Opinions

[OPINION] Destroy Gerrymandering Before it Destroys Democracy

Published

on

ORLANDO, Fla. (FNN) – In 2010, more than 60% of Florida voters opted for an amendment that would outlaw gerrymandering. This was ten years ago, yet the amendment is still relevant today. In the United States, only six states have non-partisan commissions to redraw legislative and congressional districts, apart from those six states – Arizona, California, Colorado, Idaho, Michigan, and Washington – districts are redrawn by state lawmakers (with exception of New Jersey, which has a more complex process).

Partisan redrawing presents an issue for voters, especially Asian, Latino, and black voters. One of the most famous examples of this disenfranchisement is Florida’s 5th congressional district after the 2010 census. Prior to the Florida Supreme Court’s decision to take it upon themselves to fairly redraw districts, Florida lawmakers drew a district that stretched from Jacksonville to Orlando, encompassing primarily diverse urban areas.

Gerrymandering is worrying activists as well, particularly in southern states like Georgia, where there were increases in the black turnout.

GOP operatives have also made their intentions to gerrymander districts clear, with states like Florida, North Carolina, and Georgia set as the primary targets. This will be a problem for Americans because partisan gridlock in government does not help deliver promises, it only benefits Wall Street and those at the top.

The conservative-leaning United States Supreme Court ruled less than two years ago that federal courts do not have the authority to block gerrymandering. This Supreme Court vote was gross negligence that had little regard for the racial discrimination and voter suppression that gerrymandering presented for American voters.

Although the Supreme Court neglected its duties to protect American voters, there are solutions that could be considered to bring gerrymandering to a halt.

States should be responsible enough to put independent commissions in charge of the redistricting process. Independent commissions ensure that voters are picking their representatives in a fair manner instead of the system that many states have, where representatives are picking their voters. Redistricting commissions should be headed by citizens as opposed to politicians.

Furthermore, gerrymandering hurts voters in communities of color most, by ensuring that their representation is capped to only a few representatives. Independent commissions must make it a priority to get communities of color equitable and fair representation in the redistricting process, ensuring that their votes are no longer drowned out.

Gerrymandering is a corrupt process that prohibits citizens from getting equal and fair representation, oftentimes subjecting citizens to minority rule. Gerrymandering has usually been a tool used to keep members of congress in power, but states like Pennsylvania are now trying to extend the minority rule to judicial representation as well. This effort was first brought about during Republicans efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election, seeing how unrealistic that was, state Republicans put their energy into retaking power of the legislative and judicial branches.

During the 2022 redistricting process, gerrymandering may help Republicans secure the seats of the representatives who voted in favor of overturning the election results after the Capitol riots on January 6th. Gerrymandering will not only have an adverse impact of communities of color, it will also lead to increased corruption. United States Representatives who undermine the democracy of the United States, such as Marjory Taylor Greene of Georgia will not be held accountable because as long as their party is able to hang on to state legislatures (through the process of gerrymandering), they will be able to gerrymander their way to holding on to those seats.

______________________________________________

Supervisor Nathaniel Douglas is the youngest ever elected to the Orange Soil & Water Conservation District Board of Supervisors in Orange County, Florida, and the youngest elected to public office during the 2020 election. He is a contributing political opinion writer for Florida National News. | info@floridanationalnews.com

Continue Reading

Opinions

[OPINION] Joe Biden: An Extraordinarily Normal Inauguration

Published

on

President Joe Biden takes the Oath of Office on January 20th, 2021. Photo: Sgt. Charlotte Carulli.

ORLANDO, Fla. (FNN) – Under the circumstances, I think it’s safe to say that everyone expected Joe Biden’s inauguration to be extraordinary. And in a very real way, it was…by being anything but. From the moment the guests arrived at the Capitol to the one where the 46th President took his seat in the Oval Office, I was surprised by how absolutely… normal everything felt.

Nothing leading up to that day could be considered normal by any definition of the word. The fact that Biden himself would have been the Democratic contender. The absurdity of that first debate. The cries of fraud on Election Day. The horrifying assault on Congress on January 6th, just a week before. And how can we forget all that happened while a pandemic erased so much of what we considered a normal life?

I watched the ceremony with something akin to envy. Where I come from, there hasn’t been an actual inauguration in over twenty years. While democracy has been assaulted here in the States in a very real sense, in Venezuela the word itself has lost all meaning. I did not welcome, in fact, the feeling of familiarity that came over me on the 6th (not the first time I’d felt it in the past four years, by the way). It was one of the reasons why I was still nervous, even scared, two weeks later. If things like this could happen in one of the oldest democracies in the world, how could we, as a nation, recover?

Please don’t get me wrong. I believe the Inauguration was filled with many out-of-the-norm details. Let’s start with the fact that a woman of color and Asian descent took oath as vice president. Let’s single out a breathtaking poetic performance that promised, “we will raise this wounded world into a wondrous one.” While we’re at it, let’s see how many women were front and center, what a diversity of faces and races graced the audience. We even had a moment that was charmingly meme-worthy.

Did I feel hope, though? I’m sad to say, I didn’t. Not much. Biden takes office in a country sliced in half. He will have to work with people who question his legitimacy. He has to convince citizens (especially many of my countrypeople) that think he is part of a plot to destroy us all that he is, in fact, there to unite, to repair. He faces a world where America’s spot at the table is not as close to the head as it was. And he faces a pandemic.

But Biden knows this. And the first thing he grabbed was a pen, to sign twenty-three executive orders to start repairing damages. His first hour in the office was spent working. That told me, “I’m not here to mess around.”

Though the uneventful-yet-event-filled inauguration didn’t bring me the hope I longed for, it did bring me something that perhaps was more needed. It brought me peace.

_________________________________________________

Juan Carlos Rodriguez is an entertainment and politics writer for Florida National News. | info@floridanationalnews.com

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Advertisement Ticket Time Machine ad
Advertisement Orlando Regional REALTOR Association logo
Advertisement Parts Pass App
Advertisement Hispanic Chamber of Commerce of Metro Orlando
Advertisement
Advertisement African American Chamber of Commerce of Central Florida
Advertisement FNN News en Español
Advertisement Indian American Chamber of Commerce logo
Advertisement Florida Sports Channel

FNN Newsletter

Trending