Florida
Florida Governor Ron DeSantis faces Black leaders’ anger after racist killings in Jacksonville
Published
3 years agoon
TALLAHASSEE, Fla. (AP) — Ron DeSantis scoffed when the NAACP issued a travel advisory this spring warning Black people to use “extreme care” if traveling to Florida.
The leading civil rights group argued that the state’s loose gun laws and the Republican governor’s “anti-woke” campaign to deny the existence of systemic racism created a culture of “open hostility towards African Americans and people of color.”
Just three months later, DeSantis is leading his state through the aftermath of a racist attack that left three African Americans dead. Black leaders in Florida — and across the nation — say they’re outraged by his actions and rhetoric ahead of the shooting.
“Gov. DeSantis has created and pushed a narrative of division and hate that is anti-Black,” said Rev. Jeffrey Rumlin, pastor of The Dayspring Church in Jacksonville, where three Black people were gunned down at a Dollar General store over the weekend by a white man with a swastika emblazoned on his assault rifle.
Rumlin criticized DeSantis for not explicitly describing the killer as a racist at a Sunday vigil in Jacksonville. DeSantis was booed at the vigil, where he called the shooter “a major-league scumbag” and said, “We are not going to let people be targeted based on their race.”
The Florida governor, also responding this week to a tropical storm bearing down on much of his state, has confronted multiple challenges on race since launching his presidential campaign. He has been criticized by Republican rivals on Florida’s new education standards on slavery while losing ground against former President Donald Trump, the front-runner in the GOP primary.
Ever defiant, DeSantis’ team rejected suggestions that he did not adequately condemn the weekend shooting and has more broadly ignored the concerns of the state’s African American community. The Republican governor scored an overwhelming reelection last fall that included flipping the traditional Democratic stronghold of Miami-Dade County, which has a majority Latino population. He made modest gains among Black voters.
“This shooting was a terrible tragedy, and it is reprehensible that The Associated Press has decided to collect and amplify false talking points as ‘reporting’ on this horrific event,” said DeSantis campaign spokesman Bryan Griffin. “Ron DeSantis has condemned these racially motivated murders repeatedly in the strongest language possible. … He will not tolerate racial hatred or violence in Florida, and we reject your politicization of this horrible event.”
The tragedy cast a shadow across the Republican presidential campaign this week as candidates faced uncomfortable questions about the party’s increasing appeal among white supremacists and the GOP’s fight against so-called “woke” policies on race and gender. While DeSantis has not mentioned his “war on woke” in recent days, cultural issues have been the centerpiece of his campaign.
Virtually all of the candidates have embraced a similar message aimed at appealing to the GOP’s white conservative base by downplaying the existence of racism in America and restricting LGBTQ rights. To win the general election next fall, the Republican nominee will likely need to appeal to a much more diverse group of voters. But the primary fight won’t be decided for several months.
Sen. Tim Scott, one of three Black Republicans running for president, called on his party to speak out against the latest tragedy as he campaigned in his home state of South Carolina.
“I think we should all be standing up and saying that any act of violence against someone very purely because of the color of your skin is terrible,” he told reporters. “We saw three African Americans die because of the color of their skin over the weekend. That’s devastating.”
He avoided answering directly when asked if the Republican Party has done enough to denounce white supremacist violence.
“The question is, have humans done enough to talk about racism and discrimination and the use of violence? And I think that’s the responsibility of every single American — the Republican Party, Democrat Party, no party affiliation,” Scott said.
In a radio interview with conservative commentator Hugh Hewitt, former United Nations ambassador Nikki Haley said there was no clear explanation for such violence.
“There’s a lot of hate online with social media. We’ve got a lot of mental health issues. And you combine that with the rhetoric that is happening in America of division and just being able to hide behind something on social media and getting angry, it causes for a bad cocktail,” said Haley, who was serving as South Carolina’s governor when a racist gunman attacked a Black church and killed nine people. “And when you get that, people die.”
Haley, whose parents immigrated to South Carolina from India, declared in her presidential announcement speech that America is not a racist nation.
Republicans have little political incentive to appeal to voters of color — in the primary phase of the presidential campaign, at least.
One-third of Americans (35%) say racism is “a very big problem” in the United States, according to a June poll from the Pew Research Center. Just 14% of Republicans see racism as a very significant issue compared with 55% of Democrats.
Meanwhile, one quarter of Republicans believe that being white hurts a person’s ability to get ahead, according to an April study from the Pew Research Center. Republicans are about as likely to say that being Black helps (33%) a person’s ability to get ahead in the U.S. as to say it hurts (34%) their ability to advance.
African American leaders have decried what they call a pattern of “policy violence” against people of color imposed by the DeSantis administration that reached a low point after the recent release of its public school curriculum on Black history.
Florida State House Democratic Leader Fentrice Driskell argued DeSantis’ policies on race combine to embolden racists and extremists.
She pointed to the Republican governor’s Stop-WOKE Act, which limits discussions of race in schools and businesses; his banning of diversity and equity inclusion at Florida colleges; and the newly approved Black history curriculum that suggests there were benefits to slavery. She also noted DeSantis’ loosening of gun laws, including a new law that allows people to carry guns without a permit or training.
“We’ve given warnings — don’t pass this legislation because it will only inflame tensions, don’t pass this bad bill because it will promote vigilantism, don’t do this because it will divide our communities,” Driskell said. “He has courted support from the far right. He plays footsies with it. This rhetoric was always going to lead to violence.”
Democratic Rep. Angie Nixon, who represents the district where the weekend murders took place, oscillated between angry shouts, tears and profanity as she condemned DeSantis in an interview.
“He refuses to use the word Black. He refuses to call that man a racist. He calls him a scumbag. No!” Nixon said. “He’s tiptoeing around the true issue because he’s worried that his poll numbers will drop with the base of voters that he has religiously went after.”
DeSantis derided the NAACP’s travel advisory as a “political stunt” back in May when he launched his presidential campaign.
“Claiming that Florida is unsafe is a total farce,” DeSantis said in a conversation with Elon Musk. “I mean, are you kidding me? You look at cities around this country, they are awash in crime. In Florida, our crime rate is at a 50-year low.”
On Monday, NAACP President Derrick Johnson said DeSantis deserves real blame for the weekend shooting.
“What Gov. DeSantis has done is created an atmosphere for such tragedies to take place,” Johnson said. “This is exactly why we issued the travel advisory.”
You may like

Governor DeSantis Wraps Up Italian Trade Mission with Groundbreaking MOU Signing and Advances in Aerospace and Healthcare

Fiery Orange-Osceola State Attorney Debate Exposes Deep Divisions, Calls for Election Investigation Intensify

Governor Ron DeSantis to Hold Press Conference in Tallahassee at 3:30 PM
Florida
Daisy Morales Blasts $40,000 Donation by Samuel Vilchez Santiago-Backed PAC in Florida House District 43 Race
Published
14 hours agoon
August 6, 2026ORLANDO, Fla. (FNN NEWS) — Former Florida State Rep. Daisy Morales is criticizing a $40,000 contribution from a political committee supporting Democratic rival Samuel Vilchez Santiago to the Florida House Democratic Campaign Committee, arguing the expenditure raises questions about priorities as voters in Florida House District 43 contend with rising living costs.
Morales, who is seeking to return to the Florida House, made the criticism in a campaign press release as the Aug. 18 Democratic primary enters its final stretch.
The race is a rematch of the 2020 Democratic primary for the former House District 48, when Morales defeated Vilchez Santiago and three other candidates before winning the general election.
Following legislative redistricting, many neighborhoods and communities previously included in District 48 are now within District 43.
MORALES TARGETS $40,000 PAC CONTRIBUTION
At the center of Morales’ criticism is a $40,000 contribution by Central Floridians for Change to the Florida House Democratic Campaign Committee.
The political committee has supported Vilchez Santiago’s candidacy.
Morales said the expenditure contrasts with the financial pressures facing families across East Orlando and other District 43 communities, where residents are dealing with the costs of housing, groceries, insurance, health care, transportation and other necessities.
“District 43 families are facing an affordability crisis, and they deserve leadership focused on their everyday challenges,” Morales said. “Sending $40,000 to a Tallahassee political committee tells voters something about priorities, judgment and leadership. I believe District 43 families should come first.”
Morales also questioned what the money could have accomplished if directed toward community organizations.
“Imagine what $40,000 could mean to organizations serving District 43 — food-assistance programs, veterans organizations, senior programs, youth initiatives, neighborhood groups and other nonprofits helping families every day,” Morales said. “Those are the kinds of investments that can strengthen neighborhoods and improve lives.”
Political committees, however, are separate from nonprofit organizations and can legally spend money for political purposes subject to applicable campaign finance laws. Morales’ criticism centers on the political priorities represented by the contribution rather than an allegation that the contribution itself was unlawful.
‘VOTERS NEED MORE THAN TALKING POINTS’
Morales used the contribution to challenge Vilchez Santiago’s campaign message and question whether his political support aligns with the priorities of District 43 residents.
“Voters deserve more than talking points about putting people first,” Morales said. “Actions matter. When $40,000 goes to a Tallahassee political committee while families here are struggling to make ends meet, voters have every right to ask whether their community is truly the first priority.”
Morales said she believes financial decisions provide voters with information about how candidates and their supporters establish priorities.
“A state representative helps make decisions involving billions of taxpayer dollars,” Morales said. “How someone approaches money, priorities and accountability matters. Voters should look beyond campaign slogans and examine the decisions being made right now.”
Morales characterized the contribution as a “sneak peek” at the judgment and leadership voters should evaluate before casting their ballots.
“I believe this $40,000 contribution gives voters a preview of the judgment and priorities they should evaluate when deciding who they want representing them in Tallahassee,” Morales said.
2026 CONTEST IS A REMATCH OF 2020 PRIMARY
The Democratic primary brings Morales and Vilchez Santiago together for the second time in six years.
In 2020, both sought the Democratic nomination for the former Florida House District 48.
Morales finished first in the five-candidate Democratic primary with 4,897 votes, or 39.89%, while Vilchez Santiago received 3,676 votes, or 29.94%, according to official Orange County election results.
The difference was 1,221 votes and nearly 10 percentage points.
Morales went on to win the 2020 general election and represented House District 48 from 2020 to 2022.
“We have seen this race before,” Morales said. “In 2020, voters looked beyond endorsements, political organizations and campaign spending. They examined the candidates and elected me as their Democratic nominee. Six years later, I trust District 43 voters to make their own decision again.”
The political landscape has changed since their first matchup because of redistricting, but the current District 43 includes many neighborhoods and communities that were previously represented within District 48.
That gives the contest an unusual rematch dynamic, with some voters being asked to choose again between the same two Democratic candidates for a Florida House seat.
FUNDRAISING AND ENDORSEMENTS VS. ELECTED EXPERIENCE
Vilchez Santiago has entered the closing weeks of the campaign with substantial fundraising and organizational support, including endorsements from Democratic elected officials, labor organizations and other political groups.
Morales has sought to turn those advantages into a political contrast.
She describes Vilchez Santiago as the “political-establishment candidate” while presenting herself as the “people-first candidate” with previous legislative and elected experience.
The descriptions are characterizations by Morales and her campaign.
“My opponent can have the political establishment. I want the trust of the people,” Morales said. “Endorsements do not cast ballots — voters do. District 43 voters will decide who represents them, and their endorsement is the one that matters most to me.”
Morales has also pointed to the similarities between 2020 and 2026, arguing that Vilchez Santiago held advantages in fundraising and endorsements during their first contest but nevertheless lost the Democratic nomination.
“In 2020, voters had a choice, and they elected me as their Democratic nominee,” Morales said. “Now many of those same communities have another opportunity to compare our experience, our priorities and our judgment.”
MORALES CAMPAIGNS ON EIGHT YEARS IN ELECTED OFFICE
Morales is emphasizing her eight years of elected public service as one of the central distinctions between the candidates.
She was elected to the Orange Soil and Water Conservation District in 2014 and served six years before winning election to the Florida House in 2020.
Morales served two years in the Legislature, giving her eight consecutive years in elected office.
She has made that experience a centerpiece of her campaign to return to Tallahassee.
“I am not asking voters to imagine what I might do in elected office,” Morales said. “I have served them before. They can examine my votes, my legislation, my constituent service and the state resources I fought to bring back to our communities.”
During her House tenure, Morales voted on state budgets exceeding $100 billion, sponsored and supported legislation that became law and advocated for state appropriations benefiting Central Florida and other communities.
“I have done the job, and I am ready to do it again,” Morales said. “If District 43 voters send me back to the Florida House, I will be ready on Day One to work on affordability, responsible state spending, stronger public safety, quality education and greater opportunities for working families, seniors, veterans, first responders, homeowners and small businesses.”
MORALES: ‘DISTRICT 43 COMES FIRST’
Morales said the PAC contribution illustrates what she wants voters to consider when comparing the candidates: who will come first when political and community priorities compete.
“District 43 families should never feel like they are taking a back seat to political organizations,” Morales said. “They deserve a state representative who wakes up every day thinking about their families, their neighborhoods and their future.”
She argued that the election should ultimately be decided on experience, priorities and the candidates’ records rather than fundraising totals or endorsements.
“The question is bigger than one contribution,” Morales said. “The question is who comes first when important decisions have to be made. For me, the answer will always be the people of District 43.”
Morales added: “Public service is about serving people — not political organizations. District 43 comes first because the people we are elected to serve must always come before politics.”
The Democratic primary is Aug. 18, 2026, with early voting continuing through Aug. 16.
Florida
Alex Vindman Calls on Ashley Moody to Support Release of Hope Florida Grand Jury Report
Published
6 days agoon
August 1, 2026TALLAHASSEE, Fla. (FNN) — Democratic U.S. Senate candidate Alex Vindman renewed criticism of U.S. Sen. Ashley Moody this week, calling on her to publicly support the release of the confidential Hope Florida grand jury report as questions surrounding the state’s controversial Medicaid settlement continue to draw statewide attention.
Vindman made the remarks during a Thursday news conference at the Florida Capitol alongside supporters, including a registered Republican, arguing that Florida voters deserve greater transparency regarding the Hope Florida investigation.
Vindman Launches New Campaign Website
The Vindman campaign also unveiled a new campaign website, MoodyCorruption.com, highlighting Moody’s role in the Hope Florida controversy and encouraging voters to contact public officials in support of releasing the grand jury report.
The campaign said the website was launched following recent reporting by the Miami Herald examining additional connections between Moody’s Senate campaign and the Hope Florida controversy.
Focus on Attorney General’s Role
Vindman criticized Moody’s actions while she served as Florida attorney general, pointing to the Attorney General’s Office’s approval of a $10 million Medicaid settlement transfer that later became the focus of legislative and criminal scrutiny.
According to public reporting, the settlement funds originated from a Medicaid agreement involving Centene Corp. before money was later directed through the Hope Florida Foundation and subsequently distributed to nonprofit organizations that later contributed to political committees. Investigations into the transactions have generated legislative hearings, public records litigation and criminal inquiries.
Vindman argued that the public deserves to know what conclusions, if any, a statewide grand jury reached during its investigation.
“If she has nothing to hide, she should go ahead and call for this release,” Vindman told reporters.
Grand Jury Report Remains Sealed
A central issue in the controversy is whether the final statewide grand jury report should remain confidential.
Court records indicate objections have been filed seeking to prevent or delay public release of the report. The identities of those objecting have not been publicly confirmed through court filings.
A judge is expected to determine whether the report, or portions of it, should become public.
Media Coverage Highlights
Vindman’s news conference received statewide media coverage.
WFSU reported that Vindman focused on CBS News reporting concerning Moody’s role in approving the original settlement agreement while serving as attorney general.
WUSF reported Vindman argued voters should consider the controversy as they evaluate candidates in Florida’s 2026 U.S. Senate race.
CBS Miami highlighted Vindman’s challenge for Moody to publicly support releasing the grand jury findings.
WFLA News Channel 8 reported Moody had been scheduled for an interview but that her campaign later requested to reschedule.
ABC 20 reported ongoing litigation surrounding the confidential grand jury report while covering Vindman’s criticism of Moody.
Spectrum News noted Democrats continue pressing for disclosure of the report, citing public records showing the Attorney General’s Office approved the initial transfer that later became the subject of controversy.
Moody Has Not Publicly Called for Release
As of Friday, Moody had not publicly announced support for releasing the confidential grand jury report.
The report remains under court review, and no final judicial decision has been issued regarding whether it will be released.
Why the Report Matters
Supporters of disclosure argue the public has a right to understand how taxpayer-related Medicaid settlement funds were handled and whether investigators identified misconduct or recommended reforms.
Those opposing disclosure contend grand jury secrecy protects ongoing legal interests and confidential proceedings until a court determines what may legally be released.
The court’s decision could significantly shape public understanding of one of Florida’s highest-profile political controversies as the 2026 U.S. Senate campaign continues.
Florida
Venezuelan Candidate Samuel Vilchez Santiago Leads Florida House Race with Nearly $200,000 Raised as Cross-Party Endorsement Scandal Continues
Published
6 days agoon
August 1, 2026ORLANDO, Fla. (FNN NEWS) — Democratic Florida House District 43 candidate Samuel Vilchez Santiago has emerged as the fundraising and endorsement leader in the 2026 Democratic primary while continued questions surrounding the Orange County Democratic Executive Committee’s handling of internal party discipline have become an issue in the closely watched legislative race.
According to his campaign website, Samuel Vilchez Santiago serves as a Senior Nonprofit Manager at ActBlue, where he helps thousands of nonprofits and grassroots organizations across the country build people-powered fundraising programs aimed at shifting political influence away from corporations and toward communities.
According to publicly available campaign finance reports and his campaign website, Vilchez Santiago has secured endorsements from numerous Democratic elected officials, labor organizations, and party-affiliated political committees. His campaign biography states that he serves as a Senior Nonprofit Manager at ActBlue, one of the nation’s largest Democratic fundraising platforms.
Vilchez Santiago has also publicly discussed his family’s political history, including fleeing Venezuela and seeking asylum in the United States as political refugees.
“I grew up with politics in my house. My grandfather was a communist and my parents were very politically involved against the Chavista regime.”
— Samuel Vilchez Santiago, quoted in a 2019 Princeton University profile
The statement has become part of his publicly available political biography and has resurfaced during the 2026 campaign as voters examine candidates’ personal backgrounds and political histories.
The statement has received renewed attention amid heightened national political debate over socialism and communism. President Donald Trump and other Republican leaders have frequently criticized segments of the Democratic Party by arguing that some Democratic candidates and democratic socialist movements reflect increasingly left-wing political ideologies. Although Vilchez Santiago has not publicly identified himself as a communist, his own description of his family’s political history has become part of the broader political discussion surrounding his candidacy.
Campaign finance reports show that Central Floridians for Change PAC, affiliated with Samuel Vilchez Santiago’s political operation, contributed $40,000 to the Florida House Democratic Campaign Committee ahead of the August 18, 2026, Democratic primary.
Fundraising and Endorsement Advantage
The Democratic primary for Florida House District 43 has developed into one of Central Florida’s most competitive legislative contests, with a significant disparity in campaign fundraising between the two Democratic candidates.
According to campaign finance reports, Vilchez Santiago‘s campaign raised more than $139,000 and spent more than $114,000 during the election cycle.
A political committee affiliated with Vilchez Santiago’s political operation, Central Floridians for Change PAC, reported raising more than $55,000 and spending approximately $43,000. The PAC’s chair and treasurer is José Gamboa, who also serves as treasurer for Vilchez Santiago’s campaign. Gamboa is also an Account Management Specialist with the Democratic fundraising platform ActBlue.
Campaign finance reports show one of the PAC’s largest expenditures was a $40,000 contribution to the Florida House Democratic Campaign Committee, the political committee responsible for supporting Democratic candidates seeking election to the Florida House of Representatives. The contribution represents a substantial portion of the PAC’s reported expenditures and has become a point of discussion during the Democratic primary.
Combined, the campaign and PAC reported raising approximately $200,000, giving Vilchez Santiago a significant financial advantage over former State Representative Daisy Morales, whose campaign finance reports show approximately $8,400 raised and about $6,500 spent during the same reporting period.
Campaign finance reports show that Johanna López, then a candidate for Florida House District 43, raised approximately $58,000 during the 2022 election cycle. As the incumbent seeking reelection in 2024, her campaign finance reports show she raised approximately $68,000 for the same Florida House District 43 seat now being contested by Samuel Vilchez Santiago and Daisy Morales.
Vilchez Santiago has also secured endorsement from current Florida House Democratic Leader Fentrice Driskell, numerous Democratic elected officials, organized labor unions, and party-affiliated organizations.
Despite the fundraising disparity, history suggests campaign spending alone does not determine election outcomes. During the 2020 Democratic primary for Florida House District 48, Vilchez Santiago also enjoyed a fundraising and endorsement advantage. Morales nevertheless defeated him by approximately ten percentage points before winning the general election and serving in the Florida House.
Political observers noted Morales’ countywide name recognition, earned during her service as an elected Orange County Soil and Water Conservation District Supervisor, may have contributed to that victory.
While fundraising and endorsements often increase campaign visibility, advertising, and voter outreach, Morales has argued that legislative experience, constituent service, and a demonstrated record of passing legislation are more important measures of a candidate’s preparedness to serve in the Florida House.
Former Rivals Meet Again
The 2026 Democratic primary represents a rematch between Vilchez Santiago and Morales, whose political rivalry dates back to the 2020 election.
During Vilchez Santiago’s 2020 campaign, current State Representative Johanna López served as his campaign manager, while José Gamboa served as deputy campaign for Vilchez Santiago’s campain.
Morales has argued that these longstanding political relationships warrant public examination because several individuals connected to Vilchez Santiago’s earlier campaigns later assumed influential roles within Democratic Party organizations or campaign operations.
Florida National News has not independently concluded that these relationships affected any party disciplinary decisions. However, Morales has cited them as part of her request for an independent review by the Florida Democratic Party.
Morales continues to emphasize her legislative accomplishments, constituent services, appropriations secured for Central Florida, and previous electoral victories as evidence that she is prepared to return to Tallahassee.
Local Democratic Party Dispute Continues
Beyond traditional campaign issues, the House District 43 race has become intertwined with an ongoing dispute involving the Orange County Democratic Executive Committee.
According to campaign records, Angie Gallo endorsed and served as campaign manager for Republican candidate Joel Montilla’s campaign
Morales contends the committee selectively enforced party rules following the 2024 Orange County Commission District 5 election, ultimately resulting in her removal from the local Democratic Party.
According to several news reports, Orlando Mayor Buddy Dyer endorsed Republican former Winter Park Mayor and Orange County Commission District 5 candidate Steve Leary. Mayor Dyer has endorsed Republican candidates in previous elections as well. Florida National News is not aware of any public disciplinary action taken by the Orange County Democratic Executive Committee regarding those cross-party endorsements.
According to Morales, other Democrats who participated in the same election and allegedly engaged in similar cross-party political activity were not subjected to comparable disciplinary proceedings.
Morales said her removal, combined with the absence of publicly known disciplinary action against other Democrats in similar circumstances, raises questions about whether party rules were enforced consistently, whether preferential treatment was given, and whether adequate oversight existed throughout the disciplinary process.
Morales has requested that the Florida Democratic Party conduct an independent review to determine whether party rules were applied consistently, whether due process requirements were followed, and whether conflicts of interest existed during the disciplinary process.
Florida National News has not independently verified those allegations, and the Florida Democratic Party has not publicly announced the results of any review concerning the matter.
Why the Records Matter
Morales has stated that both she and the Orlando Sentinel requested records concerning the disciplinary process, including meeting minutes, resolutions, voting records, notices of alleged violations, correspondence, investigative materials, and documentation supporting the committee’s actions.
According to Morales, those records are necessary to determine whether party bylaws were followed and whether disciplinary procedures were applied equally to similarly situated Democrats.
Florida National News will also request the same records from both the Orange County Democratic Executive Committee and the Florida Democratic Party and will publish any responsive documents or official statements received.
Questions That Remain
Several questions remain unanswered as the Democratic primary approaches, including:
- Were identical party rules applied consistently to every Democrat involved in the 2024 Orange County Commission District 5 race?
- What official findings, if any, supported the committee’s disciplinary action?
- Will the Florida Democratic Party conduct or publish an independent review?
- Will the requested records be released to the public?
Florida National News will continue reporting on campaign finance filings, public records, candidate responses, and any official actions related to this matter as additional information becomes available.
Trending
Florida14 hours agoDaisy Morales Blasts $40,000 Donation by Samuel Vilchez Santiago-Backed PAC in Florida House District 43 Race
Business7 hours agoU.S. Hispanic Chamber of Commerce Brings 47th Annual National Conference to Fort Worth Sept. 14-16
Sports7 hours agoTalladega Superspeedway Announces 2027 NASCAR Race Dates as The Chase Returns
Central Florida News7 hours agoNew Jersey Gov. Mikie Sherrill Endorses Bale Dalton in Race to Unseat Cory Mills
Central Florida News8 hours agoJaguars Sign Veteran Linebacker Jahlani Tavai, Waive Jared Bartlett With Injury Designation