Politics
San Francisco Sues President Trump for Unconstitutional Executive Order Targeting Sanctuary Cities
Published
9 years agoon
By
Willie DavidSAN FRANCISCO — City Attorney Dennis Herrera today filed a federal lawsuit against President Donald Trump and his administration for his executive order directing enforcement action against sanctuary cities and threatening to withhold federal funding from these cities. The suit claims that the order is unconstitutional and exceeds the president’s power.
“The president’s executive order is not only unconstitutional, it’s un-American,” said Herrera. “That is why we must stand up and oppose it. We are a nation of immigrants and a land of laws. We must be the ‘guardians of our democracy’ that President Obama urged us all to be in his farewell address.”
Herrera’s lawsuit comes after President Trump issued an executive order last Wednesday announcing that it would seek to deprive “sanctuary jurisdictions” of federal grants. San Francisco receives over $1.2 billion a year in federal funding, most of which goes to health care, nutrition and other safety net programs.
“This lawsuit is not a step I take lightly,” Herrera said. “But it is one that is necessary to defend the people of this city, this state and this country from the wild overreach of a president whose words and actions have thus far shown little respect for our Constitution or the rule of law. This country was founded on the principle that the federal government cannot force state and local governments to do its job for it, like carrying out immigration policy. I am defending that bedrock American principle today.”
The Tenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution – part of the Bill of Rights – embodies the principle of federalism. The amendment states that the federal government possesses only those powers provided by the Constitution. All remaining powers reside with the states or the people.
This lawsuit challenges the constitutionality of the executive order and a related federal statute. It requests a finding that San Francisco complies with applicable federal law and seeks to prevent the federal government from cutting funds to San Francisco.
The Trump administration falsely believes that sanctuary cities harbor criminals and make communities unsafe. To the contrary, any persons who is booked in San Francisco has their fingerprints sent to the federal government. If the federal government has a criminal warrant for that person, San Francisco complies with that. Moreover, sanctuary cities have less crime, fewer people in poverty and lower unemployment than other counties, according to a recent study by Tom K. Wong, an associate professor of political science at the University of California, San Diego. There are, on average, 35.5 fewer crimes committed per 10,000 people in sanctuary jurisdictions compared to non-sanctuary counties, according to Wong’s findings in a report for the Center for American Progress.
For these reasons, more than 400 cities and counties across this country – including nearly every major city from New York to Los Angeles – have sanctuary policies. They recognize what San Francisco first recognized 28 years ago when it learned that undocumented victims of domestic violence were too scared to report they were attacked because they feared being deported. Sanctuary policies encourage undocumented immigrants to report crimes so that the police can get violent criminals off the street.
Sanctuary cities protect children by ensuring that their parents feel safe taking them to playgrounds, to schools, to the hospital. Sanctuary city policies protect families. Sanctuary city policies protect all of us.
“We are all safer when everyone, including undocumented immigrants, feel safe reporting crimes,” Herrera said. “We are all healthier when every resident has access to public health programs. We are all smarter and economically stronger when every child attends school.”
“We will continue to cooperate with our federal authorities,” Herrera said, “but in a manner that respects states’ rights and our Constitution.”
The suit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California this morning against President Trump, the United States, Department of Homeland Security Secretary John Kelly, and the acting Attorney General Dana Boente.
The case is: City and County of San Francisco v. Donald J. Trump, et al., U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California Case No. 3:17-cv-00485, filed Jan. 31, 2017.
You may like
Florida
Former State Representative Daisy Morales officially qualifies for Florida House District 43 race
Published
7 hours agoon
June 9, 2026ORLANDO, Fla. (FNN) — Former Florida State Representative Daisy Morales has officially qualified to run for Florida House District 43, launching a People First Campaign focused on affordability, public safety, economic opportunity, education, and responsive government.
Morales, who represented Florida House District 48 from 2020 to 2022, enters the race with a legislative record that continues to benefit Floridians. During her first term, she sponsored and supported legislation that became state law, helping veterans, seniors, individuals with disabilities, consumers, small businesses, and working families.
“Floridians are struggling with rising costs, housing affordability challenges, skyrocketing insurance premiums, and economic uncertainty,” Morales said. “I am running because the people deserve a representative who puts their needs ahead of politics and delivers real results.”
House District 43 includes portions of East Orlando and communities previously represented by Morales before Florida’s 2022 redistricting process.
A Record of Results
As a freshman lawmaker, Morales sponsored legislation that was enacted into Florida law, including:
• HB 13 (2022) — Expanded property tax relief for qualifying widows, widowers, blind persons, and permanently disabled Floridians.
• HB 45 (2022) — Helped close gaps in federal G.I. Bill educational benefits for veterans and military families.
• HB 213 (2022) — Created Florida’s first Down Syndrome specialty license plate.
• HB 855 (2021) — Expanded workforce opportunities through barber services reform.
• HB 857 (2021) — Strengthened consumer protections against harassing telemarketing calls.
Morales also sponsored House Resolution 8069, recognizing April 2 as Puerto Rican Heritage Day in Florida.
Leadership During Crisis
During her term, Morales became known for advocating for residents during the COVID-19 pandemic, calling for additional government response, addressing affordability concerns, organizing food distributions and job fairs, and helping families access critical resources and services.
“Leadership matters most during difficult times,” Morales said. “Public service is about helping people when they need it most.”
Proven Electoral Success
In 2020, Morales won both the Democratic primary and general election for Florida House District 48. She successfully campaigned on a message of community-focused leadership and practical solutions for residents.
“The people deserve a strong voice in Tallahassee,” Morales said. “This campaign is about putting people first and delivering results that improve everyday life.”
People First Agenda
If elected, Morales said her priorities will include:
• Affordability and cost-of-living relief
• Public safety initiatives
• Workforce and economic development
• Veterans and military family support
• Senior services
• Consumer protection
• Educational opportunities
Morales also announced plans to reintroduce legislation establishing a statewide Active Shooter Alert System and pursue additional affordability-focused measures aimed at helping Florida families.
“For more than 30 years, my mission has remained the same: put people first,” Morales said. “Together, we can build a stronger future for East Orlando, Lake Nona, and communities across Florida.”
Daisy Morales and Samuel Vilchez Santiago are currently the only Democrats who have filed to run for Florida House District 43. On the Republican side, Robert Prater has entered the race, along with write-in candidate Areeb Gulzar.
The seat is being vacated by incumbent State Rep. Johanna López, who is running for the Orange County Commission.
Candidate qualifying runs from June 8 through June 12, meaning additional candidates may still enter the race before the filing deadline.
Florida’s primary election is scheduled for Aug. 18, 2026, with the general election set for Nov. 3, 2026.
Politics
Congressman Maxwell Frost, Sen. Blumenthal Introduce Right to Record Act to Protect First Amendment Rights
Published
1 day agoon
June 8, 2026WASHINGTON, D.C. (FNN) — U.S. Rep. Maxwell Alejandro Frost and U.S. Sen. Richard Blumenthal have introduced the Right to Record Act, federal legislation aimed at protecting Americans’ First Amendment rights to record, observe, and peacefully protest federal law enforcement activities.
The legislation would establish a legal pathway for individuals to sue federal law enforcement officers who violate constitutional rights while citizens are lawfully recording government activity.
According to the bill’s sponsors, the measure is intended to strengthen government transparency and accountability by protecting the public’s ability to document interactions with federal agencies, including U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).
Growing Concerns Over Transparency
The legislation comes amid ongoing protests and demonstrations outside the Delaney Hall detention facility in New Jersey, where advocates, journalists, and community members have reported instances of harassment while attempting to document conditions at the facility.
Supporters of the bill argue that Americans currently face significant legal barriers when seeking accountability for constitutional rights violations committed by individual federal officers.
“The First Amendment protects the rights to assemble, protest, and record government officials in public,” Frost said. “That right has never been more important. Without firsthand recordings, false narratives can become the official story. The Right to Record Act would protect the public’s ability to expose the truth without fear and provide a legal remedy when constitutional rights are violated.”
Strengthening First Amendment Protections
Blumenthal said video recordings have played a critical role in documenting alleged misconduct by government officials and ensuring public accountability.
“The right to bear witness has never been more important,” Blumenthal said. “This legislation strengthens the rights to record, observe, and peacefully protest while creating meaningful enforcement mechanisms for First Amendment protections that are foundational to our democracy.”
Civil Rights Organizations Back Legislation
The bill has received support from civil rights and immigrant advocacy organizations, including the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and the Florida Immigration Coalition (FLIC).
Jenna Leventoff, senior policy counsel for the ACLU, said the ability to observe and document law enforcement activities is essential for government accountability.
“The right to observe and record law enforcement is fundamental to our democracy,” Leventoff said. “Americans cannot hold government accountable if they cannot see for themselves what government officials are doing in their communities.”
Supporters say the legislation would help ensure transparency, deter misconduct, and provide Americans with stronger legal protections when exercising their First Amendment rights.
Key Provisions of the Right to Record Act
- Protects the right to record federal law enforcement officers performing official duties in public.
- Protects the rights to observe and peacefully protest government activity.
- Creates a civil cause of action allowing individuals to sue federal officers who violate these constitutional rights.
- Strengthens accountability and transparency within federal agencies.
- Provides legal remedies for Americans whose First Amendment rights are infringed.
The legislation has been introduced in both the U.S. House and Senate and awaits further congressional consideration.
Florida
Venezuelan Political Refugee Samuel Vilchez Santiago Endorsed by US. Rep. Darren Soto and the Democratic Establishment
Published
2 days agoon
June 8, 2026By
Willie DavidORLANDO, Fla. (FNN) — Florida House District 43 candidate Samuel Vilchez Santiago announced the endorsement of U.S. Congressman Darren Soto while reporting more than $160,000 raised since launching his campaign, signaling growing support among Democratic leaders and grassroots donors across Central Florida.
Vilchez Santiago, a Venezuelan political refugee who later became a U.S. citizen and prominent Democratic organizer in Orange County, is seeking to represent House District 43, which includes portions of East Orange County and Lake Nona.
Congressman Darren Soto Endorses Vilchez Santiago
“Samuel Vilchez Santiago has dedicated his career to uplifting our community, bringing people together, and creating opportunities for working families,” Soto said in a statement. “His commitment to public service and deep roots in our community are exactly what we need in the Florida House, and I’m proud to endorse him to be the next State Representative for HD 43.”
The endorsement adds one of Central Florida’s most influential Democratic voices to Vilchez Santiago’s growing coalition of supporters.
Campaign Reports More Than $160,000 Raised
According to the campaign, Vilchez Santiago has raised more than $160,000 since entering the race, including more than $32,000 during the most recent reporting period. The campaign reported receiving more than 700 contributions from over 500 unique donors and maintaining more than $110,000 cash on hand.
Campaign officials said the fundraising success will support voter outreach, communications, field organizing, and turnout efforts throughout District 43.
Investing in Grassroots Organizing
The campaign also announced the launch of a five-figure Fellowship Program designed to strengthen voter contact efforts while training the next generation of political organizers and community leaders.
“I am incredibly honored to earn Congressman Darren Soto’s endorsement,” Vilchez Santiago said. “Congressman Soto has been a tireless advocate for Central Florida’s families, workers, and small businesses, and I am grateful for his support.”
Vilchez Santiago also emphasized concerns about political representation in Central Florida.
“The partisan gerrymandering coming out of Tallahassee threatens to diminish Latino representation in Central Florida and silence communities that deserve a seat at the table,” he said. “Congressman Soto has always fought to ensure our voices are heard, and that’s exactly why it’s so important that we stand together and continue fighting for fair representation and opportunity for every family in our community.”
Statewide Democratic Leaders Unite Behind HD 43 Candidate
The endorsement underscores the significant political support Vilchez Santiago has assembled from current and former Democratic elected officials, labor organizations, and community leaders across Florida.
The endorsements reflect a significant investment of political capital by Democratic leaders statewide, who are backing Samuel Vilchez Santiago, a Venezuelan political refugee and former chair of the Orange County Democratic Party, in his bid to represent Florida House District 43.
Recent endorsements include SEIU Florida, representing more than 80,000 members statewide, the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW) Local 606, and Laborers’ International Union of North America (LiUNA!) Local 517.
He has also received endorsements from former state Sens. Annette Taddeo and Victor Torres, former Florida House Democratic Leader Mark Pafford, and former state representatives Anthony Suarez, Juan Carlos Planas, Joe Geller, Sean Shaw, Travaris McCurdy, Joe Saunders, and Dick Batchelor.
The coalition of support spans multiple regions of Florida and includes elected officials, labor leaders, and longtime Democratic activists who view Vilchez Santiago as a leading contender to represent one of Central Florida’s most diverse legislative districts.
A review of Florida Division of Elections records shows that, as of June 8, no additional Democratic candidates have filed to run for Florida House District 43. Republican candidate Robert Prater and write-in candidate Areeb Gulzar have entered the race for the seat being vacated by Rep. Johanna Lopez, who is seeking election to the Orange County Commission.
Candidate qualifying runs from June 8 through June 12, meaning additional candidates may still enter the race before the filing deadline.
Florida’s primary election is scheduled for Aug. 18, 2026, and the general election will be held on Nov. 3, 2026.
Trending
Florida2 days agoThe Villages Could Elect Florida’s First Neurosurgeon Dr. Nizam Razack to Congress
Florida2 days agoVenezuelan Political Refugee Samuel Vilchez Santiago Endorsed by US. Rep. Darren Soto and the Democratic Establishment
Florida2 days agoByron Donalds Courts Latino Voters in Kissimmee as Florida Governor Campaign Expands
Florida7 hours agoFormer State Representative Daisy Morales officially qualifies for Florida House District 43 race
Politics1 day agoCongressman Maxwell Frost, Sen. Blumenthal Introduce Right to Record Act to Protect First Amendment Rights