Politics
Rep. Soto Leads CHC Letter Opposing Citizenship Question in 2020 Census
Published
8 years agoon
By
Willie DavidWashington, D.C. – Today, Members of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus (CHC) led by Congressman Darren Soto, Chair of the CHC Taskforce on Voting and Civil Rights, sent a letter to the Department of Commerce expressing strong opposition to the addition of the citizenship question to the 2020 Census. Today’s letter was submitted as part of the Department of the Commerce’s U.S. Census Bureau public comment period, which ends August 7, 2018.
“We have grave concerns regarding the genesis of this question, particularly given that there is ongoing litigation as to whether this question was developed in a discriminatory manner or for a discriminatory purpose,” the Members wrote. “We are further concerned that the addition of a citizenship question only serves to instill fear among immigrant communities, decrease participation, and negatively impact the outcome and accuracy of the 2020 Census.”
Members argued the grave repercussions of adding an untested question to the Census: “Early surveys have documented that some immigrants are afraid to provide information or have given false information to Census employees, because they are fearful of how the information may be used. This is of great concern since Census data will determine the allocation of federal funding, congressional seats, and Electoral College delegates.”
The letter was also signed by 22 members of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus, including Chair Michelle Lujan Grisham (NM-01); First Vice Chair Congressman Joaquin Castro (CA-20); Second Vice Chair Congressman Ruben Gallego (AZ-07); Whip Congressman Pete Aguilar (CA-31); Freshman Representative Adriano Espaillat (NY-13); Congressman Luis Gutiérrez (IL-04); Congressman Raúl M. Grijalva (AZ-03); Congressman Salud O. Carbajal (CA-24); Congresswoman Nanette Diaz Barragán (CA-44); Congresswoman Linda T. Sánchez (CA-38); Congressman J. Luis Correa (CA-46); Congresswoman Grace F. Napolitano (CA-32); Congresswoman Lucille Roybal-Allard (CA-40); Congressman Juan Vargas (CA-51); Congresswoman Norma J. Torres (CA-35); Congressman Tony Cárdenas (CA-29); Congressman Jimmy Gomez (CA-34); Congressman Filemon Vela (TX-34); Congresswoman Nydia M. Velázquez (NY-07); Congressman Ruben J. Kihuen (NV-04); Congressman José E. Serrano (NY-15); and Congressman Vicente González (TX-15).
Full text of the letter available here and below:
August 3, 2018
Ms. Jennifer Jessup
Departmental Paperwork Clearance Officer
Department of Commerce
Room 6616
14th and Constitution Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20230
Dear Ms. Jessup:
On behalf of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus, we write in strong opposition to the addition of the citizenship question to the 2020 Census. We have grave concerns regarding the genesis of this question, particularly given that there is ongoing litigation as to whether this question was developed in a discriminatory manner or for a discriminatory purpose. We are further concerned that the addition of a citizenship question only serves to instill fear among immigrant communities, decrease participation, and negatively impact the outcome and accuracy of the 2020 Census.
On March 26, 2018, the Department of Commerce (DOC) directed the Census Bureau to add the citizenship question in response to a December 12, 2017 letter from Department of Justice (DOJ) General Counsel Arthur Gary to enforce Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act (VRA) to protect against racial discrimination in voting. However, on June 21, 2018, DOC Secretary Wilbur Ross filed a supplemental memorandum in the case of States of New York et al. v. United States Department of Commerce et al., stating that consideration for inclusion of the citizenship question began in February 2017, shortly after his appointment as DOC Secretary.
In this supplemental memo and internal emails subsequently disclosed, it came to light that Secretary Ross and his staff had discussed the addition of the citizenship question well before DOJ made its request supposedly for VRA purposes. These discussions comprised Senior Administration Officials, including Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach and former White House Chief Strategist Steve Bannon. Following these contradictory and misleading statements, and voting rights advocates’ and litigators’ opposition to collection of additional citizenship data, the claim that the addition of the citizenship question is being done in response to a request by DOJ to protect the civil and voting rights severely lacks credibility.
To further underscore the deleterious consequences of this question, the Census Bureau’s chief scientist, John Abowd, warned that the addition of a citizenship question to the 2020 Census would harm the accuracy of the count and generate “substantially less accurate” citizenship data than those already available in existing government records. In fact, the Census Bureau is already in possession of administrative records that would enable it to publish accurate citizenship data at the Census block level.
Article 1, Section 2, of the U.S. Constitution, and the 14th Amendment, make clear that the U.S. Census is meant to be every ten years to collect data that accurately reflects the total United States population, regardless of citizenship. Census questions undergo years of extensive review, including field testing and feedback from focus groups. Adding an untested question could seriously impair the Bureau’s ability to produce an accurate population count and result in increased costs to the Census.
Furthermore, the Trump Administration’s aggressive immigration policies have already instilled fear among immigrant communities. Immigrant communities are already less likely to report crimes or even enroll their eligible U.S. citizen children in government health and nutrition programs. Early surveys have documented that some immigrants are afraid to provide information or have given false information to Census employees, because they are fearful of how the information may be used. This is of great concern since Census data will determine the allocation of federal funding, congressional seats, and Electoral College delegates.
We urge DOC to rescind their decision to add the citizenship question to the 2020 Census. As you work to ensure a fair and accurate census that encourages full participation, we believe that including a citizenship question would only serve to suppress participation and result in inaccurate data that does not truly reflect the makeup of our nation.
Thank you in advance for your attention to this critical issue.
Sincerely,
You may like
Florida
Joe Strada Loans Campaign $5 Million, Launches $1 Million Ad Buy in Congressional District 11
Published
7 hours agoon
June 16, 2026The ad was produced by political strategist Brad Herold of Something Else Strategies and marks the first major media investment of the campaign.
$5 MILLION PERSONAL LOAN TO CAMPAIGN
Strada, founder of Strada Services, announced last week that he had loaned his congressional campaign $5 million, providing the campaign with substantial financial resources early in the election cycle.
Strada Services is one of the nation’s largest privately held, family-owned companies specializing in air conditioning, electrical, security, and plumbing services.
The campaign said the loan and advertising investment demonstrate Strada’s commitment to communicating directly with voters throughout Central Florida.
FIRST MAJOR MEDIA PUSH
The $1 million advertising effort is expected to reach voters across Florida’s 11th Congressional District through a combination of television, radio, and digital media platforms.
The campaign has positioned Strada as a conservative outsider and successful entrepreneur focused on bringing private-sector experience to Washington.
Additional details regarding future advertising and campaign events are expected in the coming weeks.
ABOUT FLORIDA’S 11TH CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT
Florida’s 11th Congressional District includes portions of Central Florida and is expected to be one of the state’s closely watched congressional races during the 2026 election cycle.
Florida
Republican Rep. Paula Stark Disqualified From Ballot, Giving Democrats Opportunity to Flip House District 47
Published
4 days agoon
June 13, 2026OSCEOLA COUNTY, Fla. (FNN NEWS) — Florida State Rep. Paula Stark has been disqualified from seeking reelection in Florida House District 47 after failing to satisfy candidate qualifying requirements before the noon Friday filing deadline.
According to state election records, Stark’s candidacy was disqualified due to a deficiency involving required financial disclosure filings, commonly referred to as Form 6. Florida law requires candidates for legislative office to timely submit all qualifying documents, including financial disclosure forms, to appear on the ballot.
Form 6 Financial Disclosure Requirement
Form 6 is a public financial disclosure document required for state elected officials and candidates. The form requires candidates to disclose assets, liabilities, sources of income, and other financial interests.
The disclosure includes a sworn certification stating: “Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have read the foregoing Form 6 and that the facts stated in it are true.”
Candidates are required to complete, sign and timely file the disclosure as part of Florida’s qualifying process. Failure to properly file required qualifying documents, including Form 6, by the statutory deadline can result in disqualification from the ballot.
Democrats Advance to Primary Election
With Stark removed from contention, Democrats now have an opportunity to capture the Republican-held seat in House District 47.
The only candidates remaining in the race are:
- Jorge Figueroa, President of the Puerto Rican Chamber of Commerce of Central Florida
- Anthony Nieves, a state investigator
The two Democrats will compete in the Aug. 18 Democratic Primary, with the winner becoming Representative-Elect.
House District 47 covers portions of Osceola County and has been represented by Stark since her election to the Florida House.
The disqualification was among the most notable developments of Florida’s 2026 candidate qualifying period and significantly alters the political landscape in a district Republicans had hoped to retain.
Central Florida News
State Rep. Bruce Antone Wins Reelection Unopposed
Published
4 days agoon
June 12, 2026By
Willie DavidORLANDO, Fla. (FNN NEWS) — Florida State Representative Bruce Antone has won reelection to the Florida House after qualifying for the 2026 election cycle without opposition.
Antone, who represents portions of Orange County, remains the longest-serving Democratic state lawmaker in Orange County and one of the most senior members of Florida’s Democratic legislative delegation.
Following his reelection, Antone thanked supporters in a statement posted on Facebook.
“Today, I was reelected to the Florida House of Representatives. I didn’t have any opposition. Thank you to everyone who has supported me during my time and tenure in the Florida House of Representatives,” Antone wrote.
Under Florida election law, candidates who qualify for office without opposition are automatically elected and do not appear on the ballot.
Antone will begin another term in the Florida House as lawmakers prepare for the 2027 Legislative Session in Tallahassee.
Trending
Florida4 days agoRepublican Rep. Paula Stark Disqualified From Ballot, Giving Democrats Opportunity to Flip House District 47
Crimes and Courts4 days agoAttorney General Uthmeier Announces Charges Against Six in South Florida Drug Trafficking Enterprise
Florida5 days agoAlan Grayson Returns to Politics, Eyes Cory Mills’ Congressional Seat
Sports5 days agoUSMNT Opens FIFA World Cup 2026 With Historic 4-1 Victory Over Paraguay
Business4 days agoU.S. Marine Veteran Receives Refurbished Vehicle Through NABC Recycled Rides Program