Politics
Rep. Soto Leads CHC Letter Opposing Citizenship Question in 2020 Census
Published
8 years agoon
By
Willie DavidWashington, D.C. – Today, Members of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus (CHC) led by Congressman Darren Soto, Chair of the CHC Taskforce on Voting and Civil Rights, sent a letter to the Department of Commerce expressing strong opposition to the addition of the citizenship question to the 2020 Census. Today’s letter was submitted as part of the Department of the Commerce’s U.S. Census Bureau public comment period, which ends August 7, 2018.
“We have grave concerns regarding the genesis of this question, particularly given that there is ongoing litigation as to whether this question was developed in a discriminatory manner or for a discriminatory purpose,” the Members wrote. “We are further concerned that the addition of a citizenship question only serves to instill fear among immigrant communities, decrease participation, and negatively impact the outcome and accuracy of the 2020 Census.”
Members argued the grave repercussions of adding an untested question to the Census: “Early surveys have documented that some immigrants are afraid to provide information or have given false information to Census employees, because they are fearful of how the information may be used. This is of great concern since Census data will determine the allocation of federal funding, congressional seats, and Electoral College delegates.”
The letter was also signed by 22 members of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus, including Chair Michelle Lujan Grisham (NM-01); First Vice Chair Congressman Joaquin Castro (CA-20); Second Vice Chair Congressman Ruben Gallego (AZ-07); Whip Congressman Pete Aguilar (CA-31); Freshman Representative Adriano Espaillat (NY-13); Congressman Luis Gutiérrez (IL-04); Congressman Raúl M. Grijalva (AZ-03); Congressman Salud O. Carbajal (CA-24); Congresswoman Nanette Diaz Barragán (CA-44); Congresswoman Linda T. Sánchez (CA-38); Congressman J. Luis Correa (CA-46); Congresswoman Grace F. Napolitano (CA-32); Congresswoman Lucille Roybal-Allard (CA-40); Congressman Juan Vargas (CA-51); Congresswoman Norma J. Torres (CA-35); Congressman Tony Cárdenas (CA-29); Congressman Jimmy Gomez (CA-34); Congressman Filemon Vela (TX-34); Congresswoman Nydia M. Velázquez (NY-07); Congressman Ruben J. Kihuen (NV-04); Congressman José E. Serrano (NY-15); and Congressman Vicente González (TX-15).
Full text of the letter available here and below:
August 3, 2018
Ms. Jennifer Jessup
Departmental Paperwork Clearance Officer
Department of Commerce
Room 6616
14th and Constitution Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20230
Dear Ms. Jessup:
On behalf of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus, we write in strong opposition to the addition of the citizenship question to the 2020 Census. We have grave concerns regarding the genesis of this question, particularly given that there is ongoing litigation as to whether this question was developed in a discriminatory manner or for a discriminatory purpose. We are further concerned that the addition of a citizenship question only serves to instill fear among immigrant communities, decrease participation, and negatively impact the outcome and accuracy of the 2020 Census.
On March 26, 2018, the Department of Commerce (DOC) directed the Census Bureau to add the citizenship question in response to a December 12, 2017 letter from Department of Justice (DOJ) General Counsel Arthur Gary to enforce Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act (VRA) to protect against racial discrimination in voting. However, on June 21, 2018, DOC Secretary Wilbur Ross filed a supplemental memorandum in the case of States of New York et al. v. United States Department of Commerce et al., stating that consideration for inclusion of the citizenship question began in February 2017, shortly after his appointment as DOC Secretary.
In this supplemental memo and internal emails subsequently disclosed, it came to light that Secretary Ross and his staff had discussed the addition of the citizenship question well before DOJ made its request supposedly for VRA purposes. These discussions comprised Senior Administration Officials, including Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach and former White House Chief Strategist Steve Bannon. Following these contradictory and misleading statements, and voting rights advocates’ and litigators’ opposition to collection of additional citizenship data, the claim that the addition of the citizenship question is being done in response to a request by DOJ to protect the civil and voting rights severely lacks credibility.
To further underscore the deleterious consequences of this question, the Census Bureau’s chief scientist, John Abowd, warned that the addition of a citizenship question to the 2020 Census would harm the accuracy of the count and generate “substantially less accurate” citizenship data than those already available in existing government records. In fact, the Census Bureau is already in possession of administrative records that would enable it to publish accurate citizenship data at the Census block level.
Article 1, Section 2, of the U.S. Constitution, and the 14th Amendment, make clear that the U.S. Census is meant to be every ten years to collect data that accurately reflects the total United States population, regardless of citizenship. Census questions undergo years of extensive review, including field testing and feedback from focus groups. Adding an untested question could seriously impair the Bureau’s ability to produce an accurate population count and result in increased costs to the Census.
Furthermore, the Trump Administration’s aggressive immigration policies have already instilled fear among immigrant communities. Immigrant communities are already less likely to report crimes or even enroll their eligible U.S. citizen children in government health and nutrition programs. Early surveys have documented that some immigrants are afraid to provide information or have given false information to Census employees, because they are fearful of how the information may be used. This is of great concern since Census data will determine the allocation of federal funding, congressional seats, and Electoral College delegates.
We urge DOC to rescind their decision to add the citizenship question to the 2020 Census. As you work to ensure a fair and accurate census that encourages full participation, we believe that including a citizenship question would only serve to suppress participation and result in inaccurate data that does not truly reflect the makeup of our nation.
Thank you in advance for your attention to this critical issue.
Sincerely,
You may like
Florida
Central Florida Lawmakers Challenge DeSantis Redistricting Map as Lawsuits Mount
Published
8 hours agoon
May 6, 2026By
Willie DavidORLANDO, Fla. (FNN) — The Central Florida Black Caucus of Local Elected Officials held a press conference on the steps of Orlando City Hall, criticizing a new congressional map signed into law by Florida Governor Ron DeSantis.
Speakers included U.S. Congressman Maxwell Frost, State Senator Lavon Bracy-Davis, State Representative Bruce Antone, Orange County Clerk of Courts Tiffany Moore Russell, representatives from Common Cause, and the Central Florida Urban League. Officials argued the map weakens minority representation and follows a recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling that scaled back key protections under the Voting Rights Act.
Florida National News has learned that three lawsuits have been filed seeking to block the newly approved congressional map following the redistricting process. The map is widely viewed as an effort to expand Republican representation in Florida’s congressional delegation ahead of upcoming elections.
IMPACT ON BLACK REPRESENTATION
Leaders warned the redistricting plan could significantly reduce the influence of Black voters in Central Florida and across the state. They argued that dismantling historically minority-access districts undermines decades of progress in equitable representation.
LEGAL CHALLENGES UNDERWAY
At least three lawsuits have been filed challenging the legality of the new map. Civil rights advocates contend the redistricting plan violates federal protections and could further erode voting rights following the Supreme Court’s recent decision.
FUTURE OF BLACK CONGRESSIONAL LEADERSHIP
Elected officials and advocacy groups expressed concern about the long-term effects on Black congressional representation. They emphasized the need for continued legal action and community engagement to protect fair representation in future elections.
Florida
DeSantis’ New Florida Congressional Map Could Spark Lawsuits, Legislative Showdown, and Statewide Protests
Published
1 week agoon
April 27, 2026TALLAHASSEE, Fla. (FNN) — Governor Ron DeSantis unveiled a proposed congressional redistricting map that could significantly reshape Florida’s representation in the U.S. House ahead of the 2026 midterm elections.
The proposal, released Monday, outlines districts that could favor Republicans in 24 seats, compared to four Democratic-leaning districts. Currently, Florida’s congressional delegation includes 20 Republicans and seven Democrats, with one vacant seat.
REDISTRICTING PROPOSAL & POLITICAL IMPACT
The governor said the new map reflects Florida’s population changes and fulfills his commitment to mid-decade redistricting. Lawmakers have been called into a special legislative session to consider the proposal.
The map appears to eliminate four Democratic-held seats, including a Tampa-area district represented by U.S. Rep. Kathy Castor, an Osceola County district held by U.S. Rep. Darren Soto—the first Puerto Rican elected to Congress from Florida—and a Palm Beach-Broward district that could displace U.S. Rep. Jared Moskowitz.
The proposal also affects a majority-Black voting district spanning Palm Beach and Broward counties, previously represented by former U.S. Rep. Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick, raising concerns about the future of minority representation.
Supporters, including Evan Power, say the map could better align districts with voter distribution. Critics, including Nikki Fried, have called the proposal unconstitutional gerrymandering. Florida law prohibits partisan gerrymandering, setting up potential legal challenges.
Rep. Tray McCurdy, D-Orlando and Rep. Angie Nixon, D-Jacksonville sit on the Florida Seal in protest as debate stops on Senate Bill 2-C: Establishing the Congressional Districts of the State in the House of Representatives Thursday, April 21, 2022 at the Capitol in Tallahassee, Fla. Rep. Daisy Morales, D-Orlando, joins the protest, holding a sign. The session was halted on the protest. (AP Photo/Phil Sears)
LOOKING BACK: 2022 PROTESTS OVER REDISTRICTING
The current debate mirrors tensions from 2022, when Democratic lawmakers staged a sit-in protest on the Florida House floor in opposition to a previous congressional map backed by DeSantis.
Lawmakers including Yvonne Hinson, Angie Nixon, Travaris McCurdy, Felicia Robinson, and Daisy Morales participated in the protest, temporarily halting legislative proceedings.
Morales, a member of the Congressional Redistricting Subcommittee and the only Hispanic lawmaker involved in the sit-in, strongly criticized the map at the time.
“Our democracy is being attacked. The governor eliminating two Black congressional seats is a power grab and it’s wrong,” Morales said in a written statement. “Stripping seats from Black representation is the same as saying the Black voice—the Black vote—doesn’t matter.”
She also warned about potential impacts on Hispanic representation:
“With this map passing, I’m deeply concerned it could target the only Puerto Rican representing Florida in Congress, Darren Soto, to benefit partisan interests. We don’t want to disenfranchise the 1.2 million Puerto Ricans in Florida.”
WHAT COMES NEXT IN 2026
As lawmakers prepare to debate the new proposal, Democrats are expected to push back through legal challenges, legislative opposition, and public advocacy.
The outcome of Florida’s redistricting battle could play a pivotal role in shaping control of the U.S. House and influence the national political landscape heading into the 2026 midterm elections.
Politics
Gov. Ron DeSantis Orders Flags at Half-Staff for Slain Coral Springs Vice Mayor Nancy M. Metayer Bowen
Published
3 weeks agoon
April 16, 2026TALLAHASSEE, Fla. (FNN) — Gov. Ron DeSantis has ordered flags to be flown at half-staff in honor of Coral Springs Vice Mayor Nancy M. Metayer Bowen, who was killed April 1 in what authorities describe as a domestic violence incident.
The directive calls for U.S. and Florida state flags to be lowered from sunrise to sunset Friday, April 17, 2026, at the State Capitol in Tallahassee and at all local and state buildings, installations and grounds throughout Coral Springs.
According to Coral Springs Police, officers conducted a wellness check at Metayer Bowen’s home after city staff raised concerns when she missed scheduled meetings and could not be reached. Responding officers found her deceased inside the residence.
Investigators said the killing appears to be a domestic violence incident. Her husband, Stephen Bowen, was later taken into custody and faces charges of premeditated murder and tampering with evidence. The case remains under active investigation.
State and local leaders say the half-staff order honors Metayer Bowen’s service and legacy in the Coral Springs community, where she was recognized for her leadership and commitment to public service.
What We Know About Her Death
Police say Metayer Bowen was killed April 1 at her Coral Springs home. Officers discovered her body during a wellness check prompted by her unexplained absence from official duties and lack of communication.
Husband Arrested, Faces Charges
Authorities arrested her husband, Stephen Bowen, who now faces premeditated murder and evidence-tampering charges. Investigators have identified the case as an apparent domestic violence incident.
State Honors Her Legacy
Gov. DeSantis ordered flags lowered across key government buildings in Tallahassee and Coral Springs, recognizing Metayer Bowen’s public service and the impact of her loss on the community.