Politics
Trump has 2 or 3 more candidates to interview for court
Published
8 years agoon
By
Willie DavidWASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump has interviewed four prospective Supreme Court justices and plans to meet with a few more as his White House aggressively mobilizes to select a replacement for retiring Justice Anthony Kennedy.
Eager to build suspense, Trump wouldn’t divulge whom he’s talking to in advance of his big announcement, set for July 9. But he promised that “they are outstanding people. They are really incredible people in so many different ways, academically and in every other way. I had a very, very interesting morning.”
Spokeswoman Sarah Huckabee Sanders said Trump met with four people for 45 minutes each Monday and will continue meetings through the rest of the week. She said Tuesday he has “two or three more that he’ll interview this week and then make a decision.”
The interviews were with federal appeals judges Raymond Kethledge, Amul Thapar, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett, said a person with knowledge of the meetings who was not authorized to speak publicly about them. The Washington Post first reported the identities of the candidates Trump spoke with.
The president spent the weekend at his Bedminster golf club, consulting with advisers, including White House counsel Don McGahn, as he considers his options to fill the vacancy with a justice who has the potential to be part of precedent-shattering court decisions on abortion, health care, gay marriage and other issues.
McGahn will lead the overall selection and confirmation process, the White House said Monday, repeating the role he played in the successful confirmation of Justice Neil Gorsuch last year.
McGahn will be supported by a White House team that includes spokesman Raj Shah, taking a leave from the press office to work full time on “communications, strategy and messaging coordination with Capitol Hill allies.” Justin Clark, director of the Office of Public Liaison, will oversee White House coordination with outside groups.
Trump’s push came as the Senate’s top Democrat tried to rally public opposition to any Supreme Court pick who would oppose abortion rights. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer issued a campaign-season call to action for voters to prevent such a nominee by putting “pressure on the Senate,” which confirms judicial nominees.
With Trump committed to picking from a list of 25 potential nominees that he compiled with guidance from conservatives, Schumer said any of them would be “virtually certain” to favor overturning Roe v. Wade, the 1973 case that affirmed women’s right to abortion. They would also be “very likely” to back weakening President Barack Obama’s 2010 law that expanded health care coverage to millions of Americans, he said.
Schumer said that while Democrats don’t control the Senate — Republicans have a 51-49 edge — most senators back abortion rights. In an unusually direct appeal to voters, he said that to block “an ideological nominee,” people should “tell your senators” to oppose anyone from Trump’s list.
“It will not happen on its own,” the New Yorker wrote in an opinion column in Monday’s New York Times. “It requires the public’s focus on these issues, and its pressure on the Senate.”
Schumer’s column appeared a day after Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, said she would oppose any nominee she believed would overturn Roe v. Wade. Collins, who appeared on ABC’s “This Week” and CNN’s “State of the Union,” said she would only back a judge who would show respect for settled law such as the Roe decision, which has long been anathema to conservatives.
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell told reporters in Ashland, Kentucky, on Monday that “it’s probably going to be close; I think there will be a big, national campaign rage. But in the end, I’m confident we’ll get the judge confirmed.”
During his 2016 campaign and presidency, Trump has embraced anti-abortion groups and vowed to appoint federal judges who will favor efforts to roll back abortion rights. But he told reporters on Friday that he would not question potential high-court nominees about their views on abortion, saying it was “inappropriate to discuss.”
Without Kennedy, the high court will have four justices picked by Democratic presidents and four picked by Republicans, giving Trump the chance to shift the ideological balance toward conservatives for years to come. Both Chief Justice John Roberts and Gorsuch, Trump’s first pick to the high court, have indicated more broadly that they respect legal precedent.
Trump has said he is focusing on up to seven potential candidates, including two women, to fill the vacancy being left by Kennedy, a swing vote on the nine-member court.
Currently the court has three women justices, all appointed by Democrats. Court watchers have been discussing the prospect of a conservative woman on the bench.
Carrie Severino, chief counsel and policy director of the Judicial Crisis Network, said she did not think picking a woman was “the top concern” of Trump, stressing judicial philosophy and experience. But she added, “If he does end up nominating a woman, she can stand on her own accomplishments.”
Anna Chu, vice president for strategy and policy at the National Women’s Law Center, said she was concerned that a female pick could be a kind of “Trojan horse.”
“What’s important in addition to increasing diversity is how that person would actually interpret law,” Chu said. “There are real stakes here. You could be a woman and not be fair minded.”
You may like
Florida
House Majority Leader Steve Scalise, Jim Jordan, Randy Fine Endorse Joe Strada for Congress
Published
1 day agoon
July 24, 2026ORLANDO, Fla. (FNN NEWS) — Republican congressional candidate Joe Strada announced endorsements Thursday from House Majority Leader Steve Scalise and U.S. Reps. Jim Jordan of Ohio and Randy Fine of Florida, adding support from prominent conservative leaders to his campaign for Florida’s 11th Congressional District.
Strada, founder of Strada Services, said the endorsements reflect confidence in his business experience and commitment to advancing conservative priorities in Congress.
Conservative Leaders Rally Behind Strada
House Majority Leader Steve Scalise praised Strada’s private-sector leadership and pledged his support for the campaign.
“Joe Strada is a strong conservative Republican who will stand with President Trump to help us deliver on the America First agenda for hardworking families in Central Florida and across the country,” Scalise said. “Joe Strada has my full endorsement because, as a businessman, Joe knows firsthand what it takes to solve problems, create jobs and empower those who are willing to work for their piece of the American Dream.”
U.S. Rep. Jim Jordan highlighted Strada’s workforce development efforts and business record.
“Joe Strada has built the American Dream for countless families in Florida and across this great nation,” Jordan said. “He’s tackled the skilled worker shortage by building his own training program and graduating students directly into the workforce. Now, more than ever, we need leaders like Joe Strada in Congress because he is a problem solver who will stand up for our shared conservative values and with President Trump.”
Florida Congressman Randy Fine also endorsed Strada, citing their shared business backgrounds and longtime friendship.
“Joe Strada doesn’t just talk about the American Dream—he’s helped thousands of Floridians live it,” Fine said. “While Washington created problems, Joe built solutions by creating his own workforce training program and putting graduates directly into good-paying jobs across Central Florida. President Trump needs fighters who know how to get things done, and I want Joe standing with President Trump and me in Congress.”
Business Background
Strada is the founder of Strada Services, which the campaign describes as the nation’s largest privately held, family-owned provider of air conditioning, electrical, plumbing, and security services. His campaign has emphasized his experience as a self-made businessman and employer, arguing that his private-sector leadership prepares him to address workforce and economic challenges in Congress.
Campaign Message
According to the campaign, Strada is running on a conservative platform focused on supporting President Donald Trump’s America First agenda, strengthening workforce development, expanding job opportunities, and promoting pro-business policies.
The endorsements from Scalise, Jordan, and Fine are expected to bolster Strada’s campaign by highlighting support from influential Republican leaders with strong ties to the House Republican Conference and the conservative movement.
Looking Ahead
Florida’s 11th Congressional District is expected to draw significant attention during the 2026 election cycle. As the campaign progresses, endorsements from national and state Republican leaders are likely to remain an important part of candidates’ efforts to build support among primary voters.
Politics
Jack Reed, Tammy Duckworth Endorse Alex Vindman in Florida U.S. Senate Race as Campaign Momentum Grows
Published
1 day agoon
July 24, 2026FORT LAUDERDALE, Fla. (FNN NEWS) — Democratic U.S. Senate candidate Alex Vindman has received endorsements from U.S. Sens. Jack Reed of Rhode Island and Tammy Duckworth of Illinois, two military veterans whose support adds to a growing list of elected officials, labor organizations, and editorial boards backing his campaign.
The endorsements come as Vindman reports a strong second-quarter fundraising performance and seeks to build momentum in one of the nation’s most closely watched Senate races.
Veterans Back Vindman’s Campaign
Reed, a West Point graduate and former Army Ranger, and Duckworth, a retired Army National Guard lieutenant colonel and combat veteran, endorsed Vindman, a retired U.S. Army lieutenant colonel, highlighting his military service and continued commitment to public service.
Vindman said he is honored to receive the support of fellow veterans serving in the U.S. Senate.
“The path to a Democratic Senate majority runs through Florida, and I am honored to earn the endorsement of Senators Jack Reed and Tammy Duckworth, fellow veterans who have continued their call to public service in the Senate,” Vindman said.
Vindman criticized his Republican opponent, U.S. Sen. Ashley Moody, accusing her of putting special interests ahead of Florida families.
“I am not a career politician. I am a 21-year combat veteran who is ready to fight to lower costs and crush the corruption in Washington that is driving up costs for Florida families,” Vindman said.
Campaign Momentum
The endorsements follow Vindman’s announcement that his campaign raised $8.5 million during the second quarter, surpassing Moody’s fundraising by nearly $5 million. His campaign also reported $7.3 million cash on hand, positioning him for what is expected to be one of the country’s most competitive Senate contests.
Campaign officials also point to recent public polling that they say shows the race between Vindman and Moody effectively tied heading into the next phase of the campaign.
Growing Coalition of Support
Reed and Duckworth join a growing coalition of supporters that includes:
- The Miami Herald Editorial Board.
- Florida Senate Democratic Leader Lori Berman.
- State Sen. Tina Polsky.
- State Rep. Dan Daley.
- SEIU Local 1991.
- Southern Regional Council of Carpenters.
The endorsements reflect support from military leaders, Democratic elected officials, organized labor, and media voices.
Florida First Agenda
Vindman is campaigning on what he calls a Florida First Agenda, focusing on lowering everyday costs for Floridians.
His platform includes proposals addressing:
- Rising grocery prices.
- Higher gasoline costs.
- Property insurance affordability.
- Housing affordability.
- Government ethics and anti-corruption reforms.
Vindman argues Washington has failed to address many of the economic issues affecting Florida families and says he would prioritize lowering household costs while increasing government accountability.
Looking Ahead
The Florida U.S. Senate race is expected to remain one of the nation’s most competitive contests, with fundraising, endorsements, and voter outreach likely to intensify as Election Day approaches. Both parties view the race as strategically important in the battle for control of the U.S. Senate.
Florida
Former Lawmaker Daisy Morales Calls for Florida Democratic Party Investigation of Ex-Chair Samuel Vilchez Santiago
Published
1 day agoon
July 24, 2026ORLANDO, Fla. (FNN NEWS) — Former Florida State Representative and Democratic candidate for Florida House District 43 Daisy Morales is demanding an independent investigation by the Florida Democratic Party into the circumstances surrounding her removal from the Orange County Democratic Executive Committee. In a sharply worded press release issued Friday, Morales challenged allegations that she endorsed Republican Orange County Commission District 5 candidate Joel Montilla during the 2024 election cycle, arguing the claim should be independently reviewed.
Morales Campaign questions former Orange County Democratic Party chair Samuel Vilchez Santiago’s credibility, judgment, and statements to the Orlando Sentinel.
Morales said the investigation should examine whether party rules were applied fairly, consistently, and in accordance with established procedures, while also reviewing whether any actual or perceived conflicts of interest existed involving former Orange County Democratic Executive Committee Chair Samuel Vilchez Santiago, who is now her opponent in the Democratic primary for House District 43.
“I welcome a fair and impartial investigation. Democratic voters deserve confidence that party rules are applied equally to everyone, regardless of political position, personal relationships, or whether someone is running for office.”
— Daisy Morales
Request for Independent Investigation
Morales is asking the Florida Democratic Party to conduct an independent review rather than relying solely on local party officials.
According to Morales, the review should determine:
- Whether party rules were consistently enforced.
- Whether proper due process was followed.
- Whether any conflicts of interest existed during the disciplinary process.
- Whether official records support the actions taken.
Morales said an independent review would help ensure public confidence in the integrity of the party’s internal governance.
How the Issue Re-Emerged
Morales said she first learned the matter had resurfaced during the 2026 House District 43 campaign after receiving questions from an Orlando Sentinel reporter.
According to Morales, the reporter indicated that Samuel Vilchez Santiago cited an alleged endorsement of Republican candidate Joel Montilla as the basis for questions regarding her removal from the local Democratic Party.
Morales disputes that characterization.
Joel Montilla: “There Was No Endorsement”
Florida National News contacted attorney Joel Montilla, the 2024 Republican candidate for Orange County Commission District 5, requesting clarification.
According to Montilla:
“It wasn’t an endorsement, it was support as the President of the Puerto Rican Bar Association of Florida, Inc.”
When asked directly whether Daisy Morales endorsed his campaign, Montilla responded:
“She did not. She only agreed to be on my host committee as I launched my campaign.”
Montilla further stated:
“There was no endorsement, only support in running. Daisy and I worked on a number of initiatives within the Puerto Rican community. My goal was to have half Democrats and half Republicans support my kickoff to show the bipartisanship in a nonpartisan race. Daisy wasn’t the only local Democrat on my host committee. There were a few.”
Asked what documentation supports his statement, Montilla replied:
“The Host Committee flyer is the only material bearing her name.”
Morales said Montilla’s statements reinforce her request that the Florida Democratic Party review all relevant records before reaching any conclusions.
Campaign Finance Disclosure
Morales also noted that Samuel Vilchez Santiago’s January 30, 2026, campaign finance report disclosed a $100 contribution from Joel Montilla.
Morales said she believes the Florida Democratic Party should determine whether party rules have been applied consistently in light of publicly reported interactions involving Democratic candidates and Republican officeholders.
Questions About Consistency
Morales is asking the state party to review whether similar situations involving Democratic officials received comparable treatment.
Among the examples she cited:
- Orlando Mayor Buddy Dyer’s public endorsement of Republican Steve Leary during the 2024 Orange County Commission District 5 race.
- A Florida Politics report published in August 2025 stating that former Kissimmee Mayor and Democratic State Representative Jose Alvarez endorsed Republican State Representative Fabián Basabe.
Morales also noted that Alvarez later endorsed Samuel Vilchez Santiago’s House District 43 campaign.
Morales said these publicly reported examples should be reviewed to determine whether party rules were enforced consistently.
“If party rules are going to be enforced, they should be enforced fairly, consistently, and transparently. Equal treatment and due process should apply to every Democrat.”
— Daisy Morales
Request for Records
Morales is requesting preservation and production of records related to the disciplinary process, including:
- Executive Committee meeting minutes
- Official resolutions
- Voting records
- Disciplinary findings
- Party bylaws
- Correspondence
- Notices
- Investigative materials
- Supporting documentation
She said a complete documentary record is necessary for any independent review.
Campaign Impact
Morales said the circumstances surrounding her removal have become part of campaign messaging during the Democratic primary.
She is asking the Florida Democratic Party to determine whether the disciplinary process created either an actual or perceived campaign advantage and whether safeguards existed to prevent conflicts of interest during a contested primary.
Morales’ campaign also said it believes an independent investigation should determine whether there were any irregularities in the disciplinary process, including improper document handling, fabrication of evidence, misrepresentation of facts, or other procedural concerns. The campaign said these allegations warrant review by the state party, rather than solely by local officials, because some local officials may have participated in or possess knowledge of the events under review.
Public Confidence
Morales emphasized that her request is intended to strengthen confidence in the Democratic Party rather than undermine it.
“This investigation is bigger than one campaign. It is about protecting the integrity of the Democratic Party and ensuring that every member is treated fairly, consistently, and with due process.”
— Daisy Morales
The Morales campaign alleges that Samuel Vilchez Santiago weaponized the local Democratic Party and the media to further what it describes as a campaign of disinformation and misinformation against Morales.
She added:
“There should be no place for anyone to weaponize a political party’s disciplinary process for personal or political advantage. Democratic voters deserve transparency, accountability, and confidence that the rules apply equally to everyone.”
Requested Action
Morales is asking the Florida Democratic Party to:
- Conduct an independent investigation.
- Preserve all relevant records.
- Review whether local and state party rules were consistently applied.
- Examine any actual or perceived conflicts of interest.
- Issue findings based on the complete documentary record.
Morales also said that if the investigation determines Samuel Vilchez Santiago engaged in conduct that violated party rules, ethical standards, or compromised the integrity of the disciplinary process, she believes the Florida Democratic Party should take whatever action it determines is appropriate under its rules, including requesting that he withdraw from the House District 43 race, if warranted by the investigation’s findings.
What’s Next for the Florida Democratic Party?
If the Florida Democratic Party chooses to review Morales’ request, the process could include:
- Determining whether an independent review is warranted.
- Preserving relevant records while any review is pending.
- Evaluating whether local party procedures complied with party bylaws.
- Reviewing whether similarly situated cases received comparable treatment.
- Determining whether any conflicts of interest existed.
- Deciding whether additional action is appropriate under party rules.
As of the information contained in Morales’ press release and the publication of this story, the Florida Democratic Party had not publicly announced whether it would open an investigation or otherwise respond to her request.
Trending
Florida1 day agoFormer Lawmaker Daisy Morales Calls for Florida Democratic Party Investigation of Ex-Chair Samuel Vilchez Santiago
Crimes and Courts1 day agoFamily of Corey Ruiz to Speak Publicly for First Time Alongside Attorney Ben Crump Following Fatal Madison Police Shooting
Business9 hours agoEssence Magazine Co-Founder Jonathan Blount Dies at 84, Leaving Enduring Legacy in Civil Rights and Black Media
Politics1 day agoJack Reed, Tammy Duckworth Endorse Alex Vindman in Florida U.S. Senate Race as Campaign Momentum Grows
Florida1 day agoHouse Majority Leader Steve Scalise, Jim Jordan, Randy Fine Endorse Joe Strada for Congress