Politics
Pelosi Remarks at Congressional Delegation Press Conference in U.S. Virgin Islands on Hurricane Recovery Efforts
Published
8 years agoon
By
Willie DavidWashington, D.C – Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi joined Congresswoman Stacey Plaskett and fellow House Democrats for a press conference to discuss their Congressional Delegation visit to St. Thomas and St. John and the ongoing hurricane recovery effort. Below are the Leader’s remarks:
Leader Pelosi. Good afternoon everyone. What an honor it is to be here with so many Members of the House of Representatives. We have come in to the Virgin Islands, Puerto Rico yesterday, at the invitation of [Congresswoman] Nydia Velázquez and Representative [Stacey] Plaskett. Behind me are Members of Congress from very important committees of jurisdiction that affect the distribution of funds for FEMA. Secondly, many of them have large Caribbean populations in their districts. Where is my friend Gregory? Right here, his wife is from the Virgin Islands. [Congressman] Gregory Meeks of New York.
Of course we are here with Congresswoman Nydia Velázquez who was born in Puerto Rico so the whole idea of what needs to be done, the knowledge of the issue, commitment from the communities we represent and, frankly, many of us have had natural disasters in our districts so we come here with some knowledge, with some judgement of how we can be helpful but what we needed to hear was how to be helpful from the community.
We were at Guy Benjamin, the firehouse, at the Community Center earlier as the Governor mentioned, health care providers briefed us on the needs, we talked and listened to water and power about how to go forward and the rest. But the question is – Stacey worked very hard, even though the bill had many poison pills, to make sure there were enough votes so that bill would pass. Her standing, her knowledge, the respect she commands in the Congress made that possible. Now, we have to make sure the administration spends the money in a much more accelerated way, in a much more accelerated way, because the needs do not stretch out, they just intensify. Of course we are concerned about what could happen next.
I always see everything as an opportunity. These hurricanes were an opportunity to leap-frog over the past ways of doing things to make the future so much better. I saw a sign that said, ‘The Virgin Islands: America’s Paradise.’ That’s the case, paradise has its rewards. We want to make sure that the fulfillment for the people of these islands comes at a time that is faster than the pace that is going on now. With respect to FEMA and all the volunteers and workers at FEMA for the job they do, but as Stacey said – we are all on a first-name-basis in our own districts – as Congresswoman Plaskett said, ‘There were many challenges before hurricanes. It took the hurricanes to put the spotlight on what some of the needs were.’
Let us use this as an opportunity to make the future better, to leap-frog over old ways of doing things, become more dependent on renewables instead of fossil fuels which only speed up hurricanes. Again, have judgments made with communities involved in them.
I just want to say what an honor it is to be here at the University of the Virgin Islands and I thank Mitchell Reeves.
[Applause]
The Vice President. Thank you for the hospitality. It’s great to hear about marine science and the things you are doing here.
So, again, these Members, they don’t come here to have a conversation. They come here to have a meeting so that we go back and make informed decisions, springing from the voices of the people we heard from, how they were personally affected. Hearing from health care professionals – Mr. Smalls, he slept at the hospital for like thirty days, at least, following. The commitment – the commitment of the people of the Virgin Islands is something that Stacey [Plaskett] has put forward in a very, very strong way and I want you all to appreciate the difference she is making.
And Governor, thank you for your leadership as well and thank you for being available today to explain from the perspective of the Virgin Islands, how we can be more helpful in terms of the interpretation. This is how it goes: Congress passes a bill with all the aspirations and enthusiasm, then the implementation goes to the executive branch but there is some risk aversion there, ‘Well, maybe they didn’t mean for us to go this far and this fast and the rest of that.’ Right?
So what we have to do is make the case. With everything, it’s about time, use of resources, money and the rest so understand so we came here determined to go back informed. We didn’t come here to say, ‘This is how we would do it.’ We came here to hear how you want it done.
Thank you Governor for making that very clear to us. Thank you Congresswoman Plaskett for your ongoing commitment in the Congress of the United States and, if I had my way, she’d have a vote in the Congress.
***
Q: What exactly can you do when you go back to Congress. The majority is the Republicans –
Congresswoman Plaskett. Many of the Members here are from specific committees. Nydia Velázquez is the Ranking Member of the Subcommittee for Small Business. Several Members here come from Financial Services which Treasury and HUD report to, we have Members who sit on Transportation and Infrastructure. Ways and Means.
Leader Pelosi. Appropriations.
Congresswoman Plaskett. More specifically, the appropriation of the funds is handled in the Interior Subcommittee – the Ranking Member Betty McCollum is here as well so hearing from us what our needs are, where the challenges may be. We can have hearings, phone calls, we can pressure those individuals and ask them for additional support. It can really go a tremendous way. Congresswoman Velázquez was telling that Puerto Rico is having an issue with their disaster allowance. She made a phone call. The Secretary would rather answer a phone call than be pulled into a hearing, and that was resolved at that point. So those are the kinds of things we can do. Brian – oh that’s what you look like, I read your articles all the time.
Q: Did you make any attempts to bring any Republican Members of Congress with you?
Congresswoman Plaskett. Yes, we did and we actually had a Republican Member with us. Leader Pelosi?
Leader Pelosi. Yes, we did and they had good intentions but this is the start of the August break so some of them had to be with family. As you know, schools start earlier and earlier, so they had the interest and four of them looked into coming. Yesterday, we were with Congresswoman González-Colón in Puerto Rico, she couldn’t come over today.
May I just say one thing about what we can do? We want to be sure – whether it is the executive branch or policy making or regulation – that they understand, clearly, the intent of Congress when we passed legislation and not in, shall we say, curbing their enthusiasm in enforcing it. So, we you want to know, clearly, firsthand, what we are talking about, but more importantly than that, what the priorities are of the Governor and the people of the island. Congresswoman Plaskett.
Congresswoman Plaskett. I want to acknowledge the Senate President Myron Jackson. Thank you so much for joining us.
[Applause]
Q: What is your understanding of the major priorities that can receive Congressional assistance?
Leader Pelosi. One of the things – we just came from [inaudible] public housing that we would like to take down.
Congresswoman Plaskett. Another one is related to health issues that we have here. We had a discussion with them. Their Members are really concerned about the reimbursement rate and Medicaid cliff that we’re going to experience in 2 years. As you know Congress gave us relief prior to the storms. The Virgin Islands have been paying an exorbitant percentage of Medicaid costs, unlike anywhere else in the United States. We have an arbitrary number; it is not based on population. If it had been based on population and with demographics we would only be paying less than 20 percent. We pay more than 40 percent of Medicaid costs. So Congress for a two-year period had a disaster bill that said they’re going to pay 100 percent to the federal government, but after that date they’re going to hit a cliff.
So these Members are very concerned about working on that because that is a huge chunk of the money that goes into that. I know Michelle Lujan-Grisham had a lively discussion on the issue of mental health and how to support mental health here in the territory. As well as our education needs and the needs of schools and federal procurement, to make sure that the money that is being spent is being spent here in the territory and that our local contractors are getting a large percent of the jobs as well as contracts to do the work.
Leader Pelosi. And then of course the moving away from fossil fuels and more to renewables to lower the costs of energy to businesses and families in the Virgin Islands. It’s stunning, the cost that hurts entrepreneurism, it hurts the family budget and we want to reduce that cost.
If I just may say, when I say Kendrick, Kendrick [Meeks] was a Congressman from Florida and he said every time you want to talk about Greg [Meeks] talk about me, because [Congressman] Greg Meeks has such a great reputation.
[Laughter]
Q: Good afternoon, nice to see you all here instead of HVC Studio A so it’s nice to see you all here. Curious on your thoughts – as I’ll be here for the month seeing this for the first time – curious on your thoughts on what you’re taking in from this visit? As well as how you’re going to expedite this process with this administration Leader Pelosi?
Leader Pelosi. Do you want to speak to that Nydia?
Congresswoman Velázquez. So I went to Puerto Rico ten days after the terrible Hurricane Maria in the island, and in between I’ve been quite a few more time and now yesterday. I can tell you that almost a year later, nine months into this painful experience, what kills me is how ill prepared the response from the administration was. And this was not something I want to criticize, but we need, as Americans – a natural disaster is not a Republican or Democratic issue.
As a nation, climate change is here. We need to be ready and prepared to help those victims come home.
Leader Pelosi. That is really a statement – the basis of that statement was made by – July 12th I think it was – a report put out by FEMA, that they said that they were serious underfunded. The supplies just weren’t that and that as it turned out it was a bigger challenge. And that’s not really how it’s supposed to be, and God bless them for having the honesty to put that out. Not that it was their fault that they were underfunded but that they recognize in that report on July 12th that the director of FEMA put out, so I refer that to you because they were at a severe disadvantage.
Let me make a further point, because of some of the issues that the Governor mentioned, thank you Governor, and Congresswoman Plaskett mentioned about situations that existed years before. And because FEMA is saying, we just simply were not ready, and I wish you would read the report on the report. That’s all the more reason to accelerate the pace of remedying some of these situations and that’s the opportunity that’s there with some of these situations.
So when Bill says to us, ‘I know that Congress intended this, but it isn’t being implemented as fast as I would like’ – is that an accurate representation? Then we have to make sure that we expedite all of that and take a longer view of some of things that we’ve learned from people here. But the sixty pages – is it fifty pages? – because our Appropriator here read the report. I just read the report on the report. But it’s sad.
Congresswoman Velázquez. So we need to get all the resources that we need, in Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands, because we cannot afford and the people on Puerto Rico cannot afford another situation like Maria.
Congresswoman Plaskett. We saw the vulnerability in the Virgin Islands, the amount people that are still compromised at this time, we’ve got to speed up the process and we’ve got to get FEMA and the tools to do that. We know that the good people who are here want to do what’s right and want to move things along, and it’s our job as Members of Congress to hear those stories so we can think about how to execute from headquarters to come back down for us.
***
Congresswoman Plaskett. So we want what is right to us. I gave them this story. We are the United States; we asked to be part of the draft, because we wanted the responsibility to be part of its privileges. And they know it’s my fight, as Leader Pelosi said, for Virgin Islanders to receive the full benefits of American citizenship. That not just includes funding, but the right to vote, the right to be a part of the American experience in all of its pains and it’s glories.
So thank you all for being here. My colleagues have a plane that they have to catch and I want to thank you all for the time that you’ve taken. Again, I want to thank the staff that have made this a very successful trip.
Thank you so much Leader for taking the time and making this a priority on your schedule. We know that you’re crisscrossing the country from now until November, with the hopes that some of us have. But I know that you really have this on your heart and that means that you feel for us.
Leader Pelosi. Well since you mentioned heart, I’ll mention that my husband and I came here on our honeymoon.
[Laughter]
Bluebeard’s Castle and Coral Bay, we were there to see note just the impact on the soil, but the impact on jobs and a better future so yeah, I can’t wait to tell my husband, it’s time for us to back.
I’ve been here many, many times and I know how committed the veteran’s community is to the Virgin Islands to the security of our country. So thank you, thank you very much.
You may like
Florida
[COURTS & LAW] Paula Stark Court Record Could Impact Daisy Morales, James Bush III Defamation Lawsuits Against FHDCC
Published
17 hours agoon
August 28, 2026Stark’s Leon County Election Fight, Bush’s $1 Million Default Battle in Miami-Dade and Morales’ Orange County Defamation Lawsuit Could Put FHDCC’s Legal Status Under Scrutiny in Three Florida Courts
ORLANDO, Fla. (FNN) — Three Florida court cases. Three counties. One political committee — and an unresolved legal question that could affect two pending defamation lawsuits.
Court records obtained and reviewed by Florida National News show the Florida House Democratic Campaign Committee (FHDCC) sought permission to become a Party Defendant in Republican state Rep. Paula Stark’s Leon County election lawsuit in June 2026.
Less than a month later, FHDCC took a different procedural position in former Democratic state Rep. James Bush III’s Miami-Dade defamation lawsuit, arguing that it is an unincorporated political organization that lacks the capacity to be sued in its own name.
That position is supported by a sworn affidavit submitted by State Rep. Christine Hunschofsky, chair of FHDCC, describing her authority over committee funds and legal matters and stating the committee’s position that it cannot be sued as a political committee.
Now, former Democratic state Rep. Daisy Morales has named FHDCC as a defendant in a separate defamation lawsuit in Orange County.
The cases involve different parties, claims and legal issues. FHDCC’s attempt to intervene in Stark’s case does not establish that the committee has capacity to be sued in Bush or Morales.
But the developing record presents a significant question: FHDCC affirmatively asked one Florida circuit court to allow it to become a Party Defendant, then later argued in another that its organizational structure prevents it from being sued in its own name.
FHDCC Asked to Become a Party Defendant in Stark Case
Stark, a Republican state representative from St. Cloud, sued after election officials determined she failed to qualify for reelection to House District 47.
Her case, Paula Stark v. Cord Byrd, et al., Case No. 2026-CA-1311, was filed in the Second Judicial Circuit in Leon County before Circuit Judge Joshua M. Hawkes.
On June 25, 2026, attorney Mark Herron filed a motion on behalf of FHDCC and Democratic House District 47 candidates Jorge Figueroa and Anthony Nieves.
The filing was expressly titled “Motion to Intervene as a Party Defendants in Pending Election Case” and asked Hawkes to permit FHDCC, Figueroa and Nieves to intervene as Party Defendants under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.230.
FHDCC also described itself in the motion as an affiliated party committee established under Section 103.092, Florida Statutes, to support Democratic candidates for the Florida House.
The committee asserted that the outcome of Stark’s lawsuit would affect the resources FHDCC would expend in the House District 47 election.
Herron signed the filing as “Attorney for the Florida House Democratic Campaign Committee.”
Herron also serves as FHDCC treasurer. His dual role could become relevant if the Bush or Morales defamation lawsuits reach discovery concerning the committee’s organization, finances or decision-making. Any potential testimony would depend on Herron’s firsthand knowledge and applicable attorney-client and other legal protections.
Hawkes Denied FHDCC Intervention
FHDCC did not succeed in becoming a party to Stark’s case.
In his July 8 Order on Petition for Mandamus, Hawkes explained that he denied FHDCC intervention because the committee’s asserted interest amounted to “just a financial stake.”
Hawkes instead allowed Figueroa and Nieves to intervene because their candidacies and political positions were directly affected by whether the primary would remain closed. The written order consequently identifies Figueroa and Nieves — not FHDCC — as intervenors.
That distinction is critical.
The Stark record establishes that FHDCC asked to become a Party Defendant. It does not establish that the court accepted FHDCC in that capacity. Hawkes expressly denied the committee’s request.
Hawkes ultimately denied Stark’s request for ballot relief. In his analysis, he also referenced an argument advanced by “counsel for Intervenors.”
The Stark litigation was subsequently closed.
Why Stark Matters
Hawkes did not decide whether FHDCC has legal capacity to sue or be sued.
He rejected FHDCC’s intervention because its asserted interest in the election dispute was insufficient.
But the underlying motion remains significant because it establishes that FHDCC, through counsel, affirmatively invoked a Florida court’s jurisdiction and asked to participate as a Party Defendant.
That record could become relevant if FHDCC maintains in other courts that its organizational structure prevents it from being sued in its own name.
Bush’s $1 Million Default Battle in Miami-Dade
While Stark’s election litigation was unfolding in Leon County, FHDCC was facing a different legal battle in Miami-Dade.
Former Democratic state Rep. James Bush III filed a defamation lawsuit in August 2025 against Edge Communications, LLC, Strong Community, FHDCC and state Rep. Ashley Gantt.
The case, James Bush III v. Edge Communications, LLC, et al., Case No. 2025-015569-CA-01, was assigned to Section CA31 of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit and Circuit Judge Migna Sanchez-Llorens, according to the court’s Case Management Order.
The order, signed Oct. 11, 2025, established July 8, 2026, as the deadline for summary judgment and dispositive motions, resolution of certain pretrial matters and mediation. It projected an Oct. 6, 2026 trial date.
On July 8 — the same day Hawkes issued his Stark ruling in Leon County — clerk defaults were entered against FHDCC and other defendants in Bush’s lawsuit, according to filings previously reviewed by FNN.
FHDCC moved to set aside its default on July 15.
Bush then filed a Motion for Final Default Judgment on July 29 seeking $1 million, plus costs, against the defaulted defendants.
The distinction is important: Bush is seeking a $1 million final default judgment. The court has not entered a $1 million judgment based on the records reviewed for this report.
FHDCC Argues It Cannot Be Sued in Its Own Name
FHDCC’s response to the Miami-Dade default creates the central comparison with the Stark record.
In its Motion to Set Aside Default, FHDCC argued that it is a 527 political unincorporated organization that lacks capacity to be sued in its own name.
The committee cited Larkin v. Buranosky, a 2008 Florida appellate decision involving unincorporated political organizations.
That remains FHDCC’s legal position, not a determination by the Miami-Dade court.
But the timing creates a significant comparison:
June 25 — Leon County: FHDCC asks to enter litigation as a Party Defendant.
July 8 — Leon County: Hawkes denies FHDCC intervention.
July 15 — Miami-Dade County: FHDCC argues that its organizational status prevents it from being sued in its own name.
Those positions are not automatically contradictory. Intervention and capacity to be sued are distinct legal questions, and Hawkes did not decide whether FHDCC possessed capacity to sue or be sued.
But the records could invite scrutiny of how FHDCC characterizes its legal identity and litigation authority in different proceedings.
FHDCC Chair Hunschofsky Submits Sworn Affidavit
The Miami-Dade dispute took on added significance when State Rep. Christine Hunschofsky, chair of the Florida House Democratic Campaign Committee, submitted a sworn affidavit supporting FHDCC’s effort to set aside the default.
Hunschofsky described FHDCC as a Florida registered political committee affiliated with the Florida Democratic Party but not controlled by it.
She also described her authority within the organization, stating that she is responsible for the allocation of FHDCC funds and for legal actions against the committee and its defense.
Hunschofsky further stated that FHDCC is an unincorporated entity and that the committee understands it “cannot be sued as a political committee.”
She said that after learning Bush had obtained a default, she immediately instructed attorney Juan-Carlos Planas to seek to set aside the default and have the case dismissed based on FHDCC’s position that it cannot be sued under Florida law.
The affidavit represents sworn statements by FHDCC’s chair concerning the committee’s structure and her responsibilities. Her assertion concerning whether FHDCC can be sued is the committee’s legal position; it does not establish that Sanchez-Llorens has accepted that interpretation.
Morales Defamation Lawsuit Brings Question to Orange County
The third case brings the issue to Orange County.
On Aug. 14, former Democratic state Rep. Daisy Morales filed a defamation lawsuit against FHDCC and Democratic House District 43 nominee Samuel Vilchez Santiago.
The case, Daisy Morales v. Samuel Vilchez Santiago and Florida House Democratic Campaign Committee, Case No. 482026CA008697A001OX, is pending in the Ninth Judicial Circuit before Circuit Judge Michael Deen.
Morales asserts claims for defamation/libel and defamation by implication arising from political mailers distributed during the Democratic primary campaign.
Among the disputed statements was a representation that Morales endorsed Republican candidates and was expelled from the Orange County Democratic Party.
Morales alleges the statements were false and defamatory.
Those allegations remain pending. Neither Vilchez Santiago nor FHDCC has been found liable for defamation.
Vilchez Santiago defeated Morales in the Aug. 18 Democratic primary, but the election result does not resolve the civil lawsuit.
Could Stark and Bush Affect Morales?
The Stark intervention record makes the potential Orange County issue clearer.
If FHDCC raises the same capacity defense against Morales that it raised against Bush, the Orange County court could be asked to consider a broader record concerning the committee’s legal identity and structure.
That record could include FHDCC’s request to become a Party Defendant in Stark; Herron’s representation of the committee; Hawkes’ denial of FHDCC intervention; FHDCC’s Miami-Dade capacity argument; Hunschofsky’s sworn affidavit; and state records governing the committee’s organization and operations.
None of that evidence establishes the merits of Morales’ defamation claims.
But it could become relevant to a threshold question:
Is FHDCC itself a proper defendant?
And if Florida law ultimately says it is not, another question follows:
Who is the proper party for allegedly actionable conduct undertaken through the committee?
Three Courts, Different Consequences
The issue carries different consequences in each court.
Leon County: FHDCC affirmatively sought Party Defendant status, but Hawkes denied its intervention. Stark’s case is closed, and nothing in the Bush or Morales litigation currently changes that outcome.
Miami-Dade County: The consequences are immediate. Bush is seeking a $1 million final default judgment while FHDCC is attempting to set aside its default and arguing that it cannot be sued in its own name.
Orange County: The issue is prospective. If FHDCC raises the same capacity defense against Morales, Deen could be asked to examine the developing Stark and Bush records in determining whether FHDCC is a proper defendant.
One Political Committee, Three Florida Courts
The court records do not establish wrongdoing by FHDCC, Herron, Hunschofsky or their attorneys. Nor do they establish the merits of the Bush or Morales defamation claims.
What they do establish is an unusual litigation record involving the same political committee across three Florida circuit courts.
In Leon County, FHDCC asked to become a Party Defendant — and Hawkes denied the request.
In Miami-Dade County, FHDCC is fighting a clerk’s default and Bush’s request for a $1 million final default judgment while arguing that it cannot be sued in its own name.
In Orange County, FHDCC is now a named defendant in Morales’ defamation lawsuit.
The cases could ultimately put a fundamental question under scrutiny:
What is the Florida House Democratic Campaign Committee’s legal status — and if FHDCC cannot be sued in its own name, who may be held legally accountable for actionable conduct undertaken through the committee if that conduct is ultimately proven?
Florida
FIU Becomes First Florida University to Launch CORE Emergency Management Partnership
Published
3 days agoon
August 26, 2026MIAMI, Fla. (FNN) — Florida officials announced the launch of the Coalition for Operational Readiness in Education, or CORE, Program at Florida International University, beginning an initiative designed to strengthen the state’s emergency management workforce through partnerships with colleges, universities and technical and trade schools.
The program will connect higher education institutions with the Florida Division of Emergency Management and other state agencies to provide students with specialized education and training in emergency management.
CORE is also expected to provide opportunities for students to earn industry-recognized certificates and establish pathways to jobs with emergency management offices and private-sector industry partners across Florida.
FIU First to Launch CORE
Florida International University in Miami is the first institution where CORE is being rolled out.
State officials said 11 institutions have committed to participating, with the long-term goal of expanding the initiative to every college, university, technical school and trade school in Florida.
The statewide expansion would create a pipeline of students trained for careers involving disaster preparedness, emergency response and recovery.
Building Florida’s Emergency Management Workforce
Florida’s exposure to hurricanes and other natural disasters has made emergency preparedness and response a major state priority.
Officials said maintaining Florida’s emergency management capabilities requires developing the next generation of professionals who will work before, during and after disasters and other emergencies.
The CORE partnerships are designed to connect classroom education with professional training, certifications and employment opportunities.
Education-to-Employment Pipeline
The program is intended to create a more direct pathway from education to careers in emergency management.
Through partnerships involving state agencies, educational institutions and industry organizations, students could gain specialized training while developing credentials recognized by employers.
The initiative could also help state and local emergency management agencies develop a larger pool of trained candidates as Florida’s population and emergency-response needs continue to grow.
Statewide Expansion Planned
While the program begins at FIU, officials said the broader objective is statewide.
The goal is to eventually establish CORE partnerships throughout Florida’s higher education and workforce-training system, including universities, colleges, technical schools and trade schools.
Florida officials also envision CORE becoming a workforce-development model that other states could replicate.
Key Takeaways
- Program: Coalition for Operational Readiness in Education (CORE)
- Initial launch: Florida International University in Miami
- State partner: Florida Division of Emergency Management and other state agencies
- Participating institutions: 11 institutions have committed so far
- Training: Specialized emergency management education and workforce preparation
- Credentials: Industry-recognized certificates
- Career component: Pathways to emergency management agencies and industry employers
- Long-term goal: Expand CORE to colleges, universities, technical schools and trade schools throughout Florida
- National objective: Develop a Florida workforce model that could be replicated in other states
Florida
Byron Donalds Selects Miami-Dade Sen. Bryan Avila as Running Mate in Florida Governor’s Race
Published
4 days agoon
August 25, 2026MIAMI, Fla. (FNN) — Republican gubernatorial nominee Byron Donalds selected Florida state Sen. Bryan Avila of Miami-Dade County as his running mate for lieutenant governor, adding a South Florida lawmaker to the GOP ticket for the 2026 general election.
Donalds announced Avila as his choice Tuesday, Aug. 25, at Miami’s historic Freedom Tower, a location closely associated with South Florida’s Cuban exile community.
The selection puts Avila alongside Donalds as Republicans turn their attention to the general election and the race to succeed Gov. Ron DeSantis.
Who Is Bryan Avila?
Avila is a Republican state senator from Miami-Dade County and previously served in the Florida House of Representatives.
His selection gives the Donalds ticket a prominent South Florida presence and adds a lawmaker with experience in both chambers of the Florida Legislature.
The Miami announcement also places immigration, communism, economic opportunity and Florida’s relationship with Latin American communities near the center of the Republican ticket’s general-election messaging.
Road to the General Election
With Avila joining the ticket, Donalds now moves toward the November general election with the Republican nominees for governor and lieutenant governor in place.
The lieutenant governor selection is one of Donalds’ most consequential decisions since securing the Republican nomination, helping define the geographic, political and demographic strategy of his statewide campaign.
Trending
Florida3 days agoFIU Becomes First Florida University to Launch CORE Emergency Management Partnership
Florida17 hours ago[COURTS & LAW] Paula Stark Court Record Could Impact Daisy Morales, James Bush III Defamation Lawsuits Against FHDCC
Sports4 days agoBaker and Emily Mayfield to Host Fourth Annual BE the Ball Event in Tampa
Sports4 days agoThe Clash Returns to Daytona in 2027 as Tickets Go On Sale for NASCAR Season Opener
Florida4 days agoByron Donalds Selects Miami-Dade Sen. Bryan Avila as Running Mate in Florida Governor’s Race