Politics
AP FACT CHECK: Fabrications of Trump and his critics
Published
8 years agoon
By
Willie DavidWASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump fabricated history when it came to assessing the 2016 election, his achievements on the opioid epidemic and a congressman’s voting record on taxes. Critics of his immigration policy got it wrong when they accused the Trump administration of taking 1,500 immigrant children from their parents and losing them.
The week in review:
TRUMP: “African-Americans vote for Democrats for the most part. You know, vast majority. They’ve been doing it for over 100 years.” — Nashville rally Tuesday.
THE FACTS: Not 100 years or anything close. Most African-Americans for much of U.S. history were disenfranchised, then prevented from voting until the 1965 Voting Rights Act, which outlawed racial discrimination in voting. Before then, those who could vote mostly backed Republicans until the 1932 election of President Franklin D. Roosevelt, whose New Deal programs of economic relief helped spur a longer-term shift of black support from Republican to Democrat.
TRUMP: “Some of these states, I won by 44 points.” — Nashville rally.
THE FACTS: Not some. One. He won Wyoming with 70 percent of the vote in 2016, exceeding Hillary Clinton’s 22 percent by nearly 48 points, according to Associated Press election data. His next biggest win came in West Virginia, where he won by 42 points.
Nationwide, Trump lost the popular vote. He garnered 46 percent to Clinton’s 48 percent, but ultimately won the election based on an Electoral College system in which the votes of smaller rural states that generally backed Trump are weighted more heavily than big, Democratic-leaning states such as New York and California.
Under the U.S. system of electing presidents, Electoral College votes are set equal to the number of U.S. representatives in each state plus its two senators.
TRUMP: “A.P. has just reported that the Russian Hoax Investigation has now cost our government over $17 million, and going up fast. No Collusion, except by the Democrats!” — tweet Friday.
THE FACTS: The AP did not report the cost is going up fast. It cited a Justice Department finding that the investigation over 10 months has cost $16.7 million, which Trump rounded up to $17 million. Of the costs assigned to the investigation, $9 million would have been spent even absent the investigation, the department said.
TRUMP: “Not that it matters but I never fired James Comey because of Russia! The Corrupt Mainstream Media loves to keep pushing that narrative, but they know it is not true!” — tweet Thursday.
THE FACTS: Trump himself fed that “narrative.” The president has said at least twice that Comey’s firing in May 2017 was related to the FBI’s investigation into whether Trump’s campaign associates coordinated with Russia in an effort to sway the 2016 election. And his lawyer, Rudy Giuliani, told Fox News in May that Trump fired Comey because the FBI director wouldn’t publicly state that Trump “wasn’t a target” of the Russia investigation. Trump’s public rationale for firing Comey has shifted on multiple occasions.
TRUMP, referring to Robert Iger, CEO of ABC’s parent Walt Disney Co.: “Iger, where is my call of apology? You and ABC have offended millions of people, and they demand a response. How is Brian Ross doing? He tanked the market with an ABC lie, yet no apology. Double Standard!” — tweet Thursday.
THE FACTS: “No apology” is wrong. Trump should know that because he expressed satisfaction in December with ABC’s statement that said, “We deeply regret and apologize for the serious error” by Ross, an investigative reporter.
Ross had reported that Trump, as a candidate, directed aide Michael Flynn to make contact with Russian officials during the campaign, a potentially explosive development. Ross changed his report hours later, saying his source stated that Trump’s outreach actually came after Trump won the election, when presidents-elect might be expected to get to know foreign officials. ABC issued the apology, suspended Ross for four weeks without pay and said he would no longer report on Trump.
At the time, that pleased Trump, who tweeted: “Congratulations to @ABC News for suspending Brian Ross for his horrendously inaccurate and dishonest report on the Russia, Russia, Russia Witch Hunt. More Networks and ‘papers’ should do the same with their Fake News!”
Trump’s revived wrath at ABC and Iger comes after the network canceled Roseanne Barr’s show because of her racist tweet about Valerie Jarrett, who was an aide to President Barack Obama. Iger tweeted that the cancellation was “the right thing” to do.
TRUMP: “There is no one better to represent the people of N.Y. and Staten Island (a place I know very well) than @RepDanDonovan, who is strong on Borders & Crime, loves our Military & our Vets, voted for Tax Cuts and is helping me to Make America Great Again. Dan has my full endorsement!” — tweet Wednesday.
HE FACTS: He’s incorrect about the tax cuts he signed into law in December. Donovan voted against them, one of the few Republicans to do so. He told AP on Thursday that Trump knew that. “The president was well aware,” he said. “We’ve had discussions about my tax vote, the president and I.” Donovan opposed the tax bill because he said it would mean a tax increase for his constituents. “With the state and local tax deduction nearly eliminated, this tax bill doesn’t equal relief for far too many New Yorkers,” he said at the time.
TRUMP, sharing this tweet from broadcaster Rush Limbaugh: “If the FBI was so concerned, and if they weren’t targeting Trump, they should have told Trump. If they were really concerned about the Russians infiltrating a campaign (hoax), then why not try to stop it? Why not tell Trump? Because they were pushing this scam.” — Thursday.
THE FACTS: The FBI did tell the Trump campaign about threats posed by foreign intelligence services. What level of detail it disclosed has not been established. It is now well known that Trump aides had multiple contacts with Russian interests during the campaign and the FBI was investigating those contacts for any evidence of collusion between the campaign and Russia. It is therefore unlikely that the FBI would share specifics that might compromise its criminal investigation.
In August 2016, an FBI counterintelligence agent gave candidate Trump what is known within the bureau as a defensive briefing about the threats from foreign intelligence services. Such briefings are fairly standard and are intended to help campaigns guard against infiltration or hacking by foreign governments, such as Russia and China. Similar briefings were given to Clinton and the two vice presidential picks prior to the election, according to an October 2017 letter from Greg Brower, then the FBI’s head of congressional affairs.
TRUMP: “We got $6 billion for opioid and getting rid of that scourge that’s taking over our country. And the numbers are way down. We’re getting the word out — bad. Bad stuff. You go to the hospital, you have a broken arm, you come out, you’re a drug addict with this crap. It’s way down. We’re doing a good job with it. But we got $6 billion to help us with opioid.” — Nashville rally.
THE FACTS: That’s misleading. One leading indicator of the opioid epidemic is down — painkiller prescriptions. Other indicators are up, such as the number of overdoses and deaths. And none of that has to do with the $6 billion enacted by Congress. The numbers are from 2017; the money is for this year and next.
Prescriptions for opioid painkillers filled in the U.S. fell almost 9 percent last year, the largest drop in 25 years. The total dosage of opioid prescriptions filled in 2017 declined by 12 percent because more prescriptions were for a shorter duration, fewer new patients started on them and high-dose prescriptions dropped. The numbers are from health data firm IQVIA’s Institute for Human Data Science.
But overdose deaths involving opioids rose to about 46,000 for the 12-month period ended October 2017, up about 15 percent from October 2016, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The numbers are preliminary because of continuing cause-of-death investigations later in the reporting period. They could go higher.
As well, the CDC says emergency department visits for overdoses of opioids rose 30 percent in the U.S. from July 2016 to September 2017. Overdoses shot up 70 percent in the Midwest in that time while increasing by 54 percent in large cities in 16 states.
TRUMP: “Democrats mistakenly tweet 2014 pictures from Obama’s term showing children from the Border in steel cages. They thought it was recent pictures in order to make us look bad, but backfires.” — tweet Tuesday.
THE FACTS: He is correct about widespread misrepresentation of the photos on Twitter.
The photos, taken by AP, were from 2014, during the Obama administration, but were presented by liberal activists as if they showed the effects of Trump’s immigration policy now. The photos were taken at a center run by the Customs and Border Protection Agency in Nogales, Arizona. One photo shows two unidentified female detainees sleeping in a holding cell. It’s not clear that many prominent Democrats spread the photos, from a 2016 Arizona Republic story, though some did.
Democrat Antonio Villaraigosa, former Los Angeles mayor now running for governor, tweeted that he was: “Speechless. This is not who we are as a nation.” Jon Favreau, ex-speechwriter for Obama, tweeted: “This is happening right now.” They and others deleted their tweets when they realized the mistake.
JIM CARREY, actor: “1500 innocent children ripped from their mothers’ arms at our border. Lost in Trump’s ‘system’. — tweet May 27.
THE FACTS: This didn’t happen. Many Trump critics, Carrey among them, misrepresented the fate of nearly 1,500 minors who came to the border — without their parents — and were transferred by U.S. authorities to sponsors in the country.
The Health and Human Services Department followed up with such children by calling their households to check on them late last year, getting information on the whereabouts of most, officials said. But they could not account for 1,475 of them, in part because many sponsors didn’t respond to the calls.
On that basis, Trump critics are calling the children “lost.” But in that round of calls, the Trump administration actually had a slightly better rate of confirming such children’s circumstances than the Obama administration did in 2016, according to an inspector general’s report — 86 percent versus 85 percent.
The episode with the unaccompanied children and the 2014 photos distracted from what is actually happening. Under a Trump policy to enforce criminal charges against people crossing the border illegally with few or no previous offenses, separation of parents from children is bound to become more common, and that trend may have started.
A Customs and Border Protection official told lawmakers that 658 children had been separated from their parents at the border from May 6 to May 19, after border agents began referring every illegal entry to criminal prosecutors. This is in addition to hundreds more who were estimated to have been removed from their parents at the border since October.
You may like
Central Florida News
FL NOW PAC Endorses Eric Gray, Jane Aman, Felipe Sousa-Lazaballet and Samuel Vilchez-Santiago in Florida House Races
Published
10 hours agoon
August 10, 2026ORLANDO, Fla. (FNN NEWS) — FL NOW PAC has announced endorsements in four Florida House races, backing Eric Gray in House District 35, Dr. Jane Aman in District 37, Felipe Sousa-Lazaballet in District 42 and Samuel Vilchez-Santiago in District 43.
The political action committee said the endorsements were based on candidates’ responses to a questionnaire examining issues including women’s rights, women’s equality, LGBTQIA+ rights, reproductive health care, racial justice and economic justice.
According to FL NOW PAC, the candidates demonstrated support for policy priorities associated with the National Organization for Women.
“FL NOW PAC believes these candidates are ready to tackle critical issues affecting our communities especially affordability in housing, cost of living, insurance, Medicaid and SNAP, providing critical support to millions of Floridians,” FL NOW PAC President Julie Kent said in the endorsement announcement.
The PAC also said the endorsed candidates would support what it described as efforts to protect constitutional rights, democratic institutions and ethical government.
Eric Gray — Florida House District 35
FL NOW PAC endorsed Eric Gray in Florida House District 35, highlighting his work as executive director of the Christian Service Center for Central Florida.
According to the organization, Gray’s campaign priorities include affordable housing, strengthening public education, reproductive rights and voting access.
The PAC said Gray has also expressed concerns about policies that could disproportionately affect voting access in marginalized communities.
Dr. Jane Aman — Florida House District 37
Dr. Jane Aman received the PAC’s endorsement in Florida House District 37.
FL NOW PAC described Aman as a University of Central Florida lecturer and longtime community organizer with a record of advocacy involving marginalized communities.
According to the endorsement announcement, Aman’s campaign priorities include affordability, education, reproductive health care access and protection of the rural boundary.
Felipe Sousa-Lazaballet — Florida House District 42
FL NOW PAC endorsed Felipe Sousa-Lazaballet in Florida House District 42.
The organization highlighted Sousa-Lazaballet’s background as an immigrant and LGBTQ+ Floridian and said his professional work has focused on expanding opportunity and advancing inclusive policies.
According to the PAC, his “Thriving Together Agenda” includes expanding access to affordable health care.
The organization also cited his support for reproductive rights, contraception access, maternal care and programs serving people with disabilities.
Samuel Vilchez-Santiago — Florida House District 43
FL NOW PAC endorsed Samuel Vilchez-Santiago in Florida House District 43, saying his campaign emphasizes affordability, public education, democracy, reproductive rights and women’s access to health care.
According to the PAC, Vilchez-Santiago has framed his campaign around “putting people over politics” and expanding opportunities for residents.
The endorsement announcement said his priorities were shaped by his personal experience growing up in the community and include lowering costs for Florida families and strengthening public schools.
FL NOW PAC Outlines Endorsement Criteria
FL NOW PAC said candidates seeking its support were evaluated through a questionnaire addressing several of the organization’s principal policy areas.
Those issues included freedom from violence against women, racial justice, reproductive health care, economic justice and constitutional equality.
The organization said its endorsed candidates best represented its political and policy priorities heading into the 2026 election.
Florida
FL NOW PAC Backs Angie Gallo, Melissa Vickers and Gloria Pickar for Orange County School Board
Published
11 hours agoon
August 10, 2026ORLANDO, Fla. (FNN NEWS) — FL NOW PAC has announced endorsements in several Orange County School Board races, citing candidates’ positions on public education, women’s rights, equality, LGBTQIA+ rights and other issues prioritized by the organization.
According to the PAC, candidates seeking its endorsement completed a questionnaire addressing policy areas tied to the National Organization for Women’s issue platform, including freedom from violence against women, racial justice, reproductive health care, economic justice and constitutional equality.
“FL NOW PAC believes these candidates are ready to tackle critical issues affecting our communities especially affordability in housing, cost of living, insurance, Medicaid and SNAP, providing critical support to millions of Floridians,” FL NOW PAC President Julie Kent said in the organization’s announcement.
The PAC said it believes its endorsed candidates will support public education, democratic institutions and policies aligned with the organization’s priorities.
Angie Gallo
FL NOW PAC highlighted Angie Gallo’s support for public education, diversity, student empowerment, higher teacher pay and increased resources for teachers and students.
Gallo has served eight years on the Orange County School Board representing District 1, according to the PAC’s announcement.
The organization said Gallo supports the right of all students to receive an education and emphasized her experience on the board as part of its endorsement.
Melissa Vickers
FL NOW PAC also endorsed Melissa Vickers, describing her as a Florida A&M University College of Law graduate, Edgewater High School alumna, Latina and mother of two.
Vickers is executive director and co-founder of the Orlando Center for Justice, an organization focused on legal services and access to justice.
According to FL NOW PAC, Vickers has centered her professional work on helping families access opportunities and protecting their legal rights.
Gloria Pickar
The PAC also announced its support for Gloria Pickar, noting her legal education and focus on issues affecting families experiencing economic hardship.
According to the endorsement announcement, Pickar earned her law degree from the University of Florida with a concentration in poverty research.
FL NOW PAC said Pickar’s campaign emphasizes academic achievement, school safety, educator support and preparing students for success beyond the classroom.
The organization said Pickar wants Orange County Public Schools to focus on measurable student outcomes and strengthening public schools.
FL NOW PAC Outlines Endorsement Priorities
FL NOW PAC said its endorsement process focuses on candidates whose positions align with the organization’s priorities involving women’s equality, civil rights, economic justice and public education.
The PAC also said its endorsed candidates support what it described as efforts to defend constitutional principles and address ethical concerns in government.
The endorsements represent FL NOW PAC’s latest involvement in local Orange County elections as candidates compete for seats overseeing one of Florida’s largest public school systems.
Florida
ActBlue Investigations Raises Vetting, Due-Diligence Questions for Samuel Vilchez Santiago’s Florida House Endorsers
Published
12 hours agoon
August 10, 2026Two ActBlue employees hold key roles in a Florida House campaign and supporting PAC that raised about $217,000 combined, raising questions about what endorsers knew before recommending the candidate to voters
ORLANDO, Fla. (FNN NEWS) — Continuing national scrutiny surrounding Democratic fundraising platform ActBlue is intersecting with a Florida House race, raising questions about candidate vetting, endorsement due diligence and what voters should know before casting their ballots.
Samuel Vilchez Santiago, a Democratic candidate for Florida House District 43, identifies himself as a PACs and nonprofits senior manager at ActBlue. His campaign treasurer, José Gamboa, also works for ActBlue as an account management specialist while simultaneously serving in leadership and financial roles with Central Floridians for Change, a political committee supporting Vilchez Santiago.
Together, Vilchez Santiago’s campaign and the supporting PAC have raised approximately $217,000 — about $155,000 by the campaign and $62,000 by Central Floridians for Change, according to campaign-finance records reviewed by Florida National News.
Central Floridians for Change contributed $50,000 to the Florida House Democratic Campaign Committee in July. The House Democratic committee subsequently participated in political advertising supporting Vilchez Santiago, according to a mailer distributed to District 43 voters and reviewed by FNN. The mailer’s disclaimer states that it was approved by Vilchez Santiago.
At the same time, Vilchez Santiago’s campaign website displays an extensive endorsement network of political and advocacy organizations, labor unions and current and former elected officials.
Those relationships do not establish wrongdoing by Vilchez Santiago, Gamboa, ActBlue or either political committee.
But against the backdrop of continuing congressional and federal scrutiny involving ActBlue, they raise legitimate questions about transparency, political fundraising and the level of due diligence conducted before influential organizations and public officials recommended Vilchez Santiago to voters.
Why Vetting and Due Diligence Matter to Voters
Political endorsements are intended to influence elections.
When members of Congress, mayors, state legislators, constitutional officers, labor unions and national advocacy organizations publicly recommend a candidate, they put their names and reputations behind that recommendation.
That makes the process preceding an endorsement relevant to voters.
A comprehensive vetting process can examine a candidate’s professional history, financial relationships, campaign-finance records, potential conflicts, public statements and other information relevant to holding public office.
But an endorsement alone does not establish that such a review occurred.
An endorsement tells voters whom an organization or political leader supports. Due diligence tells voters how carefully that recommendation was made.
That distinction takes on greater significance when a candidate’s employer is simultaneously facing federal and congressional investigations.
ActBlue Faces Continuing National Scrutiny
ActBlue has faced extensive congressional scrutiny involving its online political fundraising operations.
Republican-led investigations by the U.S. House Judiciary Committee, Committee on House Administration and House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform have examined allegations involving fraud prevention, donor verification, potentially prohibited foreign contributions and internal compliance practices.
Congressional investigators have subpoenaed ActBlue records and sought testimony from current and former employees.
Federal scrutiny expanded after President Donald Trump’s April 24, 2025, presidential memorandum directed the attorney general to investigate allegations involving online fundraising platforms and potentially unlawful political contributions.
The existence of congressional or federal investigations does not establish that allegations against ActBlue have been proven.
ActBlue has disputed allegations of wrongdoing and maintained that it complies with federal campaign-finance laws.
Congressional Investigators Have Examined ActBlue Employees
The role and knowledge of ActBlue employees have become part of the congressional investigation.
House investigators have subpoenaed current and former employees for depositions based on their responsibilities and potential knowledge of ActBlue’s internal operations.
In April 2026, three House committees released a second joint interim staff report addressing ActBlue. Congressional investigators reported that five current or former ActBlue employees invoked their Fifth Amendment rights a combined 146 times during depositions.
Invoking the Fifth Amendment is a constitutional right and does not establish guilt.
There is also an important distinction involving the two ActBlue employees connected to the Florida House race.
Florida National News has identified no public evidence that Vilchez Santiago or Gamboa has been charged with wrongdoing, publicly identified as a target or subject of a federal criminal investigation, or publicly named as subjects of the congressional ActBlue investigations.
Their employment at ActBlue does not establish wrongdoing.
But because investigators have focused on what certain ActBlue employees knew and what responsibilities they held, the professional roles of Vilchez Santiago and Gamboa become relevant to understanding the Florida connection to the national story.
ActBlue PACs and Nonprofits Senior Manager Samuel Vilchez Santiago, a former Orange County Democratic Party chair and candidate for Florida House District 43. Photo Credit: Samuel Vilchez Santiago
Vilchez Santiago Says He Helps ‘Thousands’ Through ActBlue
Vilchez Santiago openly promotes his ActBlue employment as part of his professional qualifications.
His campaign website states:
“As a Senior Nonprofit Manager at ActBlue, he helps thousands of nonprofits and grassroots movements across the country build people-powered fundraising programs that shift political influence away from corporations and toward communities.”
The statement portrays a broad professional role involving fundraising programs for organizations across the country.
It does not establish that Vilchez Santiago works in ActBlue’s fraud-prevention, donor-verification, legal or compliance operations.
But because Vilchez Santiago himself emphasizes the scale of his responsibilities, the precise nature of that work is relevant to understanding whether his duties overlap with areas receiving congressional or federal scrutiny.
José Gamboa, an ActBlue account management specialist, serves as Vilchez Santiago’s campaign treasurer. He is also Central Floridians for Change’s chairman and treasurer, while records list him as its registered agent. Photo Credit: Jose Gamboa
Second ActBlue Employee Holds Key Campaign and PAC Roles
The ActBlue connection extends beyond Vilchez Santiago.
José Gamboa, an ActBlue account management specialist, serves as Vilchez Santiago’s campaign treasurer.
Gamboa also holds multiple positions with Central Floridians for Change, the political committee supporting Vilchez Santiago.
Campaign-finance records identify Gamboa as the committee’s chairman and treasurer, while records also list him as its registered agent.
That places two ActBlue employees in significant positions surrounding the same Florida House race:
Vilchez Santiago — ActBlue senior nonprofit manager and Florida House candidate.
Gamboa — ActBlue account management specialist, Vilchez Santiago campaign treasurer and chairman, treasurer and registered agent of Central Floridians for Change.
The overlapping roles are not evidence of misconduct.
They are, however, relevant facts for organizations and elected officials conducting candidate due diligence.
Campaign and Supporting PAC Raised About $217,000
Campaign-finance records reviewed by FNN show:
Vilchez Santiago campaign: approximately $155,000
Central Floridians for Change: approximately $62,000
Combined: approximately $217,000
The campaign and political committee are legally separate entities. The combined figure is used to illustrate the financial scale surrounding the candidate campaign and PAC supporting him.
Gamboa holds key financial positions involving both entities.
PAC Sent $50,000 to Florida House Democratic Campaign Committee
Central Floridians for Change contributed $50,000 to the Florida House Democratic Campaign Committee in July 2026, according to campaign-finance records reviewed by FNN.
The money was reported through three contributions:
$25,000
$15,000
$10,000
The contributions totaled $50,000.
Compared with the approximately $62,000 raised by Central Floridians for Change, the transfer represents roughly 81% of the PAC’s fundraising.
The contribution does not establish an improper transaction.
It does establish a substantial financial relationship between the Vilchez Santiago-supporting political committee and the Democratic political committee responsible for helping elect candidates to the Florida House.
House Democratic Committee Subsequently Supported Vilchez Santiago
The financial relationship was followed by political activity in House District 43.
A mailer distributed to District 43 voters and reviewed by FNN identifies the Florida House Democratic Campaign Committee in its political-advertisement disclaimer and communicates support for Vilchez Santiago and other Democratic candidates.
The disclaimer states that the advertisement was approved by Samuel Vilchez Santiago, Democrat, for state representative.
The documented sequence is significant:
Central Floridians for Change raised approximately $62,000 → transferred $50,000 to the Florida House Democratic Campaign Committee → the House Democratic committee subsequently participated in political advertising supporting Vilchez Santiago → the mailer states it was approved by Vilchez Santiago.
That sequence does not establish a quid pro quo, illegal coordination or campaign-finance violation.
It does establish a financial and political relationship that is relevant to understanding the network surrounding the District 43 campaign.
FNN Fact-Check Rated Mailer Claim ‘Mostly False’
Florida National News separately fact-checked a specific claim contained in the Florida House Democratic Campaign Committee mailer and rated that claim “Mostly False.”
The rating applies only to the specific statement examined by FNN and should not be interpreted as a finding that every statement contained in the mailer was false.
Because the advertisement’s disclaimer states that it was approved by Vilchez Santiago, the accuracy of its claims is relevant to voters evaluating both the advertisement and the candidate.
FNN’s separate fact-check details the evidence supporting the rating.
Extensive Endorsements Put Due Diligence in Focus
Vilchez Santiago’s campaign website displays dozens of endorsements from political and advocacy organizations, labor unions and current and former elected officials.
The campaign lists support from organizations including Equality Florida Action PAC, Latino Victory Fund, SEIU Florida, Orange County Fire Fighters Association, Florida NOW, Giffords PAC, Run for Something, LGBTQ+ Victory Fund, Florida Rising, Florida AFL-CIO, Central Florida AFL-CIO, Florida Education Association and United Auto Workers, among others.
Federal political figures listed by the campaign include U.S. Reps. Darren Soto and Maxwell Frost and former U.S. Rep. Gabrielle Giffords.
Florida political figures listed include Democratic legislative leaders, state senators and representatives, along with Central Florida officials including Orange County Mayor Jerry Demings and Orlando Mayor Buddy Dyer.
The number and prominence of those endorsements demonstrate substantial institutional political support.
They do not, by themselves, reveal the extent of the vetting conducted before those endorsements were issued.
What Did Endorsers Know?
The national ActBlue scrutiny and the Florida campaign-finance relationships create several basic due-diligence questions.
Were endorsers aware that Vilchez Santiago worked as a senior manager for ActBlue?
Did they examine the scope of his responsibilities?
Did they know his campaign treasurer also worked for ActBlue and simultaneously controlled key financial functions for Central Floridians for Change?
Did they review the approximately $217,000 raised by the campaign and supporting PAC?
Were they aware of the $50,000 transfer to the Florida House Democratic Campaign Committee and the subsequent political advertising supporting Vilchez Santiago?
And were they aware of the congressional and federal scrutiny involving ActBlue before lending their names to his candidacy?
Those questions do not presume that an endorsement was improper.
They address something voters cannot determine simply by looking at a campaign endorsement page:
What due diligence occurred before the endorsement?
Why It Matters to Florida Voters
The national ActBlue controversy may appear removed from a Florida House primary.
In District 43, the connections are direct.
An ActBlue senior manager is seeking election to the Florida Legislature.
Another ActBlue employee manages his campaign finances while simultaneously holding leadership and financial positions with a PAC supporting him.
The campaign and PAC raised approximately $217,000 combined.
The PAC transferred $50,000 to the Florida House Democratic Campaign Committee.
That committee subsequently participated in political advertising supporting the ActBlue-employed candidate.
Meanwhile, dozens of organizations and current and former elected officials are asking voters to support Vilchez Santiago.
None of those facts establishes wrongdoing.
But voters are entitled to understand not only who endorsed a candidate, but what those endorsers knew before they made that recommendation.
Vetting matters. Due diligence matters. And when influential political figures and organizations use their credibility to influence voters, the process behind their endorsements matters, too.
What Comes Next: FNN Will Seek Answers
Florida National News will continue examining the intersection between ActBlue, its employees, the Vilchez Santiago campaign, Central Floridians for Change and the Florida House Democratic Campaign Committee.
As part of a follow-up report, FNN plans to seek responses from ActBlue, Samuel Vilchez Santiago, José Gamboa and the Florida House Democratic Campaign Committee, as well as political organizations and current and former elected officials who endorsed Vilchez Santiago.
FNN will ask ActBlue to clarify the professional responsibilities of Vilchez Santiago and Gamboa, including whether their positions involve nonprofit organizations, PACs, political committees or accounts connected with Florida political activity.
Vilchez Santiago and Gamboa will be asked about their overlapping ActBlue, campaign and political committee roles and whether ActBlue maintains policies governing employees who simultaneously participate in campaigns or political committees.
The Florida House Democratic Campaign Committee will be asked about the $50,000 received from Central Floridians for Change, its subsequent political advertising supporting Vilchez Santiago and the process surrounding the mailer approved by the candidate.
FNN will also ask major endorsers what vetting and due diligence they conducted before recommending Vilchez Santiago to District 43 voters and whether they reviewed his ActBlue employment and the campaign-finance relationships documented in this report.
The responses — including which organizations and officials respond, what they say they reviewed and how they explain their decisions — will be examined in a subsequent Florida National News report.
For voters, that follow-up could help answer the central question raised by the extensive endorsement network:
What did endorsers know, what did they review and how much due diligence occurred before they asked District 43 voters to trust their recommendation?
Trending
Sports12 hours agoMcCumbee McAleer Racing Parts Ways With Nate Cicero, New Driver Announcement Coming
Central Florida News3 days agoActBlue Managers Samuel Vilchez Santiago, Jose Gamboa Hold Key Roles in Florida House Race Amid Federal Investigations
Florida4 days agoDaisy Morales Blasts $40,000 Donation by Samuel Vilchez Santiago-Backed PAC in Florida House District 43 Race
Florida12 hours agoActBlue Investigations Raises Vetting, Due-Diligence Questions for Samuel Vilchez Santiago’s Florida House Endorsers
Florida3 days agoFlorida House Speaker Daniel Perez to Resign After U.S. Senate Confirms Brazil Ambassador Nomination