World
How two strikes on militant leaders in the Middle East could escalate into a regional war
Published
8 months agoon

TEL AVIV, Israel (AP) — The targeting of two senior militant leaders in two Middle Eastern capitals within hours of each other — with each strike blamed on Israel — risks rocking the region at a critical moment.
The strikes come as international mediators are working to bring Israel and Hamas to agree to a cease-fire that would wind down the devastating war in Gaza and free hostages. Intense diplomatic efforts are also underway to ease tensions between Israel and Hezbollah after months of cross-border fighting.
The assassination of Hamas’ top leader Ismail Haniyeh in Tehran and the strike against senior Hezbollah commander Fouad Shukur in Beirut could upend those painstaking attempts to defuse a Middle East powder keg. Iran has also threatened to respond after the attack on its territory, which could drag the region into all-out war.
Here’s a look at the potential fallout from the strikes:
Gaza cease-fire negotiations could crumble
Haniyeh’s assassination could prompt Hamas to pull out of cease-fire negotiations being mediated by the U.S., Egypt and Qatar, though it has yet to comment on the issue.
But given Haniyeh’s role, a senior Egyptian official with direct knowledge of the negotiations said the killing will highly likely have an impact, calling it “a reckless act.”
“Haniyeh was the main link with (Hamas) leaders inside Gaza, and with other Palestinian factions,” said the official, who met with the Hamas leader multiple times in the talks. “He was the one we were meeting face-to-face and talking about the cease-fire.”
The official spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to discuss the talks with the media.
Qatari Prime Minister Mohammed Bin Abdul Rahman al-Thani condemned the attacks.
“How can mediation succeed when one party assassinates the negotiator on the other side?” he wrote on the social media platform X.
U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken said he didn’t want to speculate on the effect, but the events renewed the “imperative of getting the cease-fire,” which he said they are working toward on a daily basis.
Hezbollah has said that it will halt its fire on Israel if a Gaza cease-fire is reached.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has argued that military pressure will prompt Hamas to agree to a deal, but previous killings of senior figures have not appeared to increase the chances for an agreement.
People in Gaza expressed sadness and shock over Haniyeh’s killing and worried that a cease-fire deal was slipping away.
“By assassinating Haniyeh, they are destroying everything,” said Nour Abu Salam, a displaced Palestinian. “They don’t want peace. They don’t want a deal.”
The increasingly desperate families of hostages held in Gaza urged for their loved ones to be released.
“I’m not interested in this assassination or that assassination, I’m interested in the return of my son and the rest of the hostages, safe and sound, home,” said Dani Miran, whose son Omri, 46, was kidnapped from Kibbutz Nahal Oz on Oct. 7.
A broader war on more fronts risks erupting
The strikes also raised alarm among some diplomats working to defuse tensions in the region.
“The events in Tehran and Beirut push the entire Middle East to a devastating regional war,” said one Western diplomat.
The diplomat — whose government has engaged in concerted diplomacy to prevent an all-out war between Israel and Hezbollah, but is not directly involved in cease-fire or hostage negotiations — called the killing of Haniyeh a “serious development” that has “almost killed” a possible cease-fire in Gaza, given its timing and location.
She said that Haniyeh’s killing inside Tehran while attending the inauguration of an Iranian president “will force Tehran to respond.”
The assassination in Tehran is not the first time that Israel has been blamed for a targeted attack on Iranian soil, but it’s one of the most brazen, said Menachem Merhavy, an expert on Iran from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
Israel hasn’t taken responsibility for the strike, though it vowed to kill all of Hamas’ leaders over the Oct. 7 attacks. Merhavy thinks it’s unlikely that Iran will respond directly to Israel, such as with the barrage of 300 rockets in April after a suspected Israeli strike in Syria that killed two Iranian generals in an Iranian consular building.
He believes Iran is more likely to send its response via Hezbollah.
“Iran knows that its capability of hurting Israel is much more significant from Lebanon,” said Merhavy.
The location of Haniyeh’s assassination was just as important as the strike itself, he said.
“The message was to Iran and the proxies, if you thought in Tehran you’re protected, we can reach you there as well,” said Merhavy. “Reconsider your relations with Tehran, because they cannot protect you on its own soil.”
Targeted leaders can be easily replaced
Although Haniyeh’s name has more international recognition, the strike on Hezbollah commander Fouad Shukur, if successful, is “much more important from a functional point of view,” said Michael Milshtein, an Israeli analyst of Palestinian affairs at Tel Aviv University and a former military intelligence officer.
He said Shukur was involved in the day-to-day management of Hezbollah’s strikes on Israel, including, according to Israel, the rocket attack on Majdal Shams that killed 12 youths on Saturday. Israel said its hit in Beirut on Tuesday killed him but Hezbollah has not confirmed that.
“If Hezbollah is considering how to act or to respond, one of the main question marks is how they’re going to manage a war without Shukur,” said Milshtein.
Others said Shukur, if he is in fact killed, will easily be replaced.
“Hezbollah has thick layers of commanders and leaders, and the killing of 1 or 10 or 500 will not change the equation,” said Fawaz Gerges, of the London School of Economics.
Gerges said Haniyeh is a much more symbolic leader and is far removed from the day-to-day operations in Gaza.
“Even though the assassination of Haniyeh is a painful blow for Hamas, it will make no difference in the military confrontation between Israel and Hamas,” and Gerges.
He noted that Israel has a long history of assassinating leaders of Palestinian groups, but those strikes have little impact as the leaders are quickly replaced.
World
America First: Secretary Rubio’s Strategy for Strengthening U.S. Leadership in the Western Hemisphere
Published
2 months agoon
February 2, 2025
WASHINGTON, DC (FNN) – American leadership is back in the Western Hemisphere, and we’re ready to stand with our regional partners. Putting America First means prioritizing relationships within our own hemisphere to ensure stability, security, and prosperity.
As part of this renewed focus, my first international trip as Secretary of State will take me to Panama, El Salvador, Costa Rica, Guatemala, and the Dominican Republic—nations that stand to benefit from stronger ties with the United States. For too long, American foreign policy has overlooked our closest neighbors while focusing on distant regions. That changes now.
A New Era of Regional Diplomacy
President Trump’s bold foreign policy begins at home, securing our borders and working with regional allies to control illegal migration. Diplomacy plays a key role in this effort. We must collaborate with nations across the Western Hemisphere to prevent further migrant flows and ensure the repatriation of those in the U.S. unlawfully. These discussions may be challenging, but they are absolutely necessary.
Beyond migration, our engagement will create economic opportunities that benefit both the U.S. and our regional allies. The COVID-19 pandemic exposed the vulnerabilities of America’s reliance on global supply chains. By relocating critical industries closer to home, we can boost economic growth in our hemisphere while securing our own economic future.
A Stronger Hemisphere for a Stronger America
Our goal is to create a cycle of prosperity: stronger U.S. partnerships lead to more jobs and growth in the region, reducing incentives for illegal immigration. This economic stability provides governments with the resources to fight crime and invest in their own development, making them less susceptible to foreign influence.
Countries like China have sought to expand their influence in our region, making empty promises that fail to deliver real results. By strengthening our alliances, we can ensure that our neighbors build their futures alongside the United States, not under the influence of adversarial powers.
Confronting the Challenges of Mass Migration and Security Threats
Mass migration has created widespread instability. Drug cartels—now officially recognized as foreign terrorist organizations—have fueled violence and the fentanyl crisis across our communities. Additionally, illegitimate regimes in Cuba, Nicaragua, and Venezuela are exploiting this chaos, while China exerts economic and diplomatic pressure, including at the Panama Canal.
Our approach is based on real, shared interests—not vague ideals or utopian promises. The U.S. will extend its hand to nations committed to genuine partnership, confident that together, we can achieve lasting stability and prosperity.
Building a More Secure and Prosperous Future
By reinforcing trade, security, and diplomatic cooperation, the U.S. and its regional partners will achieve mutual benefits. My mission as Secretary of State is clear: to make our alliances stronger, our borders more secure, and our economic future more resilient.
It is an extraordinary privilege to serve in this role, and I look forward to keeping you informed on the vital work being done by our incredible State Department team. America’s leadership in the Western Hemisphere is back—stronger than ever.
World
Trump Implements 25% Tariffs on Imports from Canada and Mexico, 10% on China to Address National Emergency
Published
2 months agoon
February 2, 2025
WASHINGTON, D.C. (FNN) – President Donald J. Trump has announced a bold new tariff policy, imposing additional tariffs on imports from Canada, Mexico, and China, citing an ongoing national emergency caused by illegal immigration and the fentanyl epidemic.
Under the new order, the United States will implement:
- A 25% tariff on all imports from Canada and Mexico
- A 10% tariff on all imports from China
- A reduced 10% tariff on energy resources from Canada
The move is part of a larger effort to hold these nations accountable for failing to stop the flow of illegal drugs and migrants into the United States.
Addressing an Urgent National Crisis
The extraordinary threat posed by illegal immigration and drugs, particularly fentanyl, constitutes a national emergency under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). President Trump’s decisive action aims to curb the supply of deadly fentanyl, which has devastated American communities.
- Chinese officials have failed to stop the flow of precursor chemicals used to produce fentanyl, enabling criminal cartels.
- Mexican drug cartels continue to manufacture and transport dangerous narcotics, while the Mexican government has turned a blind eye.
- Canada has seen a rise in Mexican cartel-linked fentanyl production, contributing to the international drug trade.
The administration’s orders make it clear: the flow of contraband drugs like fentanyl into the United States is a national security threat and a public health emergency.
Leveraging U.S. Economic Strength for Security
President Trump is using America’s economic power to secure the border and combat the fentanyl crisis. Previous administrations failed to use economic leverage effectively, allowing problems to fester.
- Access to the U.S. market is a privilege, not a right. The U.S. has one of the most open economies in the world, yet trade accounts for only 24% of U.S. GDP, compared to 67% of Canada’s, 73% of Mexico’s, and 37% of China’s.
- The U.S. trade deficit in goods exceeded $1 trillion in 2023, the largest in the world.
- Tariffs are a proven tool for protecting national interests and forcing compliance.
Despite years of inaction from previous leaders, President Trump is taking decisive action to put Americans’ safety and national security first.
President Trump Keeps His Promise to Secure the Border
President Trump was overwhelmingly elected to stop illegal immigration and secure the border—this is exactly what he is doing.
- The Biden administration has fueled the worst border crisis in U.S. history, with over 10 million illegal aliens attempting entry since 2021.
- A rising number of Chinese nationals and individuals on the terror watchlist have been apprehended at the border.
- Northern border crossings from Canada have surged, worsening the crisis.
The influx of illegal immigrants is straining America’s resources, overwhelming schools, hospitals, and housing, while increasing crime.
- Last fiscal year, Customs and Border Protection (CBP) seized over 21,000 pounds of fentanyl—enough to kill over 4 billion people.
- Officials estimate only a fraction of fentanyl smuggled across the southern border is actually seized.
- Fentanyl overdoses now kill more Americans annually than the entire Vietnam War.
Building on Past Success in Trade and Security
President Trump has a proven track record of using tariffs to protect American interests.
- In 2019, Trump successfully pressured Mexico into border security cooperation by threatening tariffs.
- He imposed tariffs on steel and aluminum imports to protect U.S. industries.
- Trump’s tariffs on China helped curb intellectual property theft and unfair trade practices.
- Last week, he used tariffs to resolve national security concerns with Colombia.
President Trump remains committed to enforcing trade policies that prioritize American safety and prosperity. His new tariffs send a clear message: America will no longer tolerate inaction from Canada, Mexico, and China when it comes to illegal immigration and drug trafficking.
World
Canada Strikes Back with $155 Billion in Tariffs After U.S. Trade Action
Published
2 months agoon
February 2, 2025
OTTAWA, CANADA (FNN) – A major trade dispute between the United States and Canada is escalating, as Ottawa announces sweeping counter-tariffs in response to U.S. duties on Canadian exports. The White House has moved forward with a 25% tariff on Canadian goods and a 10% tariff on energy imports, set to take effect on Tuesday, February 4.
Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau condemned the decision, emphasizing its potential economic fallout for both countries. “This decision threatens a historic economic relationship, one that has created so much wealth, prosperity, and opportunity on both sides of the border,” he stated in an official address.
Canada’s Response: $155 Billion in Tariffs on U.S. Goods
In retaliation, Canada will impose 25% tariffs on $155 billion worth of American goods. The measures will be rolled out in two phases:
- $30 billion in tariffs will take effect immediately on Tuesday
- An additional $125 billion will be imposed after 21 days to allow Canadian businesses time to adjust.
The new tariffs will impact a wide range of American products, including beer, wine, bourbon, fruits, vegetables, clothing, furniture, and sports equipment. Canada is also considering non-tariff measures targeting critical minerals, energy, procurement, and trade partnerships.
Impact on the U.S. and Canada
The Canadian government warns that the U.S. tariffs will harm American workers and businesses. They could lead to higher prices on essential goods such as food, gas, and raw materials, while also affecting American auto manufacturing and national security sectors by disrupting access to crucial Canadian exports like steel, aluminum, uranium, and potash.
“Tariffs against Canada will put American jobs at risk, potentially shutting down auto plants and raising grocery store prices,” the Prime Minister said.
A Call for Unity Among Canadians
The Canadian government is urging citizens to support domestic industries. Measures include:
- Encouraging consumers to choose Canadian-made products over U.S. imports
- Supporting Canadian businesses, farmers, and manufacturers
- Reducing reliance on U.S. trade by strengthening internal markets
“Now is the time to choose Canada. There are many ways to support our country—from buying local to vacationing within our borders,” the Prime Minister urged.
What’s Next?
- Further trade negotiations between Canada and the U.S. may take place in the coming weeks.
- Potential diplomatic intervention could attempt to de-escalate the dispute.
- Supply chain adjustments by Canadian businesses seeking alternatives to U.S. products.
- Economic impact assessments as both countries brace for potential job losses and price hikes.
The world is watching as North America’s strongest economic partnership faces one of its biggest challenges in decades. Will the two nations find common ground, or will this escalate into a full-blown trade war?
Trending
- Business16 hours ago
Monica Hoyos Joins Florida National News as Managing Editor
- Sports2 days ago
Salsa Icon Marc Anthony Attends 2025 Miami Open with Wife Nadia Ferreira
- Politics3 days ago
Bracy Siblings Face Off in Heated Battle for Florida Senate District 15 Seat
- US NATIONAL NEWS18 hours ago
Mia Love, First Black Republican Woman in Congress, Passes Away at 49
- Sports2 days ago
Orlando City’s Offense Explodes in Historic 4-1 Victory Over D.C. United