Connect with us

Politics

Payback: Trump Ousts Officials Who Testified on Impeachment

Published

on

FILE - In this Wednesday, Nov. 20, 2019, file photo, U.S. Ambassador to the European Union Gordon Sondland testifies before the House Intelligence Committee on Capitol Hill in Washington, during a public impeachment hearing of President Donald Trump's efforts to tie U.S. aid for Ukraine to investigations of his political opponents. President Donald Trump has ousted Sondland, who gave damaging testimony in impeachment inquiry. (AP Photo/Andrew Harnik, File)

WASHINGTON (AP) — Exacting swift punishment against those who crossed him, an emboldened President Donald Trump on Friday ousted two government officials who had delivered damaging testimony against him during his impeachment hearings. The president took retribution just two days after his acquittal by the Senate.

First came news that Trump had ousted Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman, the decorated soldier and national security aide who played a central role in the Democrats’ impeachment case. Vindman’s lawyer said his client was escorted out of the White House complex Friday, told to leave in retaliation for “telling the truth.”

“The truth has cost Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman his job, his career, and his privacy,” attorney David Pressman said in a statement. Vindman’s twin brother, Lt. Col. Yevgeny Vindman, also was asked to leave his job as a White House lawyer on Friday, the Army said in a statement. Both men were reassigned to the Army.

Next came word that Gordon Sondland, Trump’s ambassador to the European Union, also was out.

“I was advised today that the President intends to recall me effective immediately as United States Ambassador to the European Union,” Sondland said in a statement.

The White House had not been coy about whether Trump would retaliate against those he viewed as foes in the impeachment drama. White House press secretary Stephanie Grisham said Thursday that Trump was glad it was over and “maybe people should pay for that.”

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said in a statement that Vindman’s ouster was “a clear and brazen act of retaliation that showcases the President’s fear of the truth. The President’s vindictiveness is precisely what led Republican Senators to be accomplices to his cover-up.”

Rep. Jackie Speier, D-Calif., called it “the Friday Night Massacre,” likening the situation to President Richard Nixon’s so-called Saturday night massacre, when top Justice Department officials resigned after refusing to do his bidding by firing a special prosecutor investigating the Watergate scandal. (The prosecutor himself was fired anyway.)

Speier added in her tweet, “I’m sure Trump is fuming that he can’t fire Pelosi.”

Senate Republicans, who just two days prior acquitted Trump of charges he abused his office, were silent Friday evening. Many of them had reacted with indignation during the Senate trial when Democratic Rep. Adam Schiff, the lead prosecutor, suggested Trump would be out for revenge against the lawmakers who crossed him during impeachment.

Since his acquittal, Trump has held nothing back in lashing out at his critics, including Sen. Mitt Romney of Utah, the only Republican to vote against him. On Friday, he also took after Sen. Joe Manchin, a moderate Democrat from West Virginia whom Trump had hoped would vote with the Republicans for his acquittal but who ended up voting to convict.

Trump tweeted that he was “very surprised & disappointed” with Manchin’s votes, claiming no president had done more for his state. He added that Manchin was “just a puppet” for the Democratic leaders in the House and Senate.

It was Alexander Vindman who first told the House that in America “right matters” — a phrase repeated in the impeachment trial by lead prosecutor Schiff.

Sondland, too, was a crucial witness in the House impeachment inquiry, telling investigators that “Everyone was in the loop” on Trump’s desire to press Ukraine for politically charged investigations. He told lawmakers how he came to understand that there was a “quid pro quo” connecting a desired White House visit for Ukraine’s leader and an announcement that the country would conduct the investigations the president wanted.

Sondland “chose to be terminated rather than resign,” according to a U.S. official who spoke on condition of anonymity because they had not been authorized to discuss the matter publicly.

Alexander Vindman’s lawyer issued a one-page statement that accused Trump of taking revenge on his client.

“He did what any member of our military is charged with doing every day: he followed orders, he obeyed his oath, and he served his country, even when doing so was fraught with danger and personal peril,” Pressman said. “And for that, the most powerful man in the world — buoyed by the silent, the pliable, and the complicit — has decided to exact revenge.”

The White House did not respond to Pressman’s accusation. “We do not comment on personnel matters,” said John Ullyot, spokesman for the National Security Council, the foreign policy arm of the White House where Vindman was an expert on Ukraine.

The Democrats angling to replace Trump took notice of Vindman’s ouster during their evening debate in Manchester, New Hampshire. Former Vice President Joe Biden asked the audience to stand and applaud the lieutenant colonel.

Vindman’s status had been uncertain since he testified that he didn’t think it was “proper” for Trump to “demand that a foreign government investigate” former Vice President Joe Biden and his son’s dealings with the energy company Burisma in Ukraine. Vindman’s ouster, however, seemed imminent after Trump mocked him Thursday during his post-acquittal celebration with Republican supporters in the East Room and said Friday that he was not happy with him.

“You think I’m supposed to be happy with him?” Trump told reporters on the South Lawn of the White House. “I’m not. … They are going to be making that decision.”

Vindman, a 20-year Army veteran, wore his uniform full of medals, including a purple heart, when he appeared late last year for what turned out to be a testy televised impeachment hearing. Trump supporters raised questions about the immigrant’s allegiance to the United States — his parents fled the Soviet Union when he was a child —and noted that he had received offers to work for the government of Ukraine, offers Vindman said he swiftly dismissed.

In gripping testimony, Vindman told the House of his family’s story, his father bringing them to the U.S. some 40 years ago.

“Dad, my sitting here today in the U.S. Capitol, talking to our elected officials, is proof that you made the right decision 40 years ago to leave the Soviet Union and come here to United States of America in search of a better life for our family,” he testified. “Do not worry, I will be fine for telling the truth.”’

Hillary Clinton, the 2016 Democratic presidential nominee, recalled Vindman’s testimony that he would be fine and tweeted, “It’s appalling that this administration may prove him wrong.”

Some of Trump’s backers cheered Vindman’s removal.

Rep. Lee Zeldin, R-N.Y., tweeted that Vindman “should not be inside the National Security Council any longer. It’s not about retaliation. It’s because he cannot be trusted, he disagrees with the President’s policies, & his term there is coming to an end regardless.”

News that both Vindman twins had been ousted led Rep. Paul Gosar, R-Ariz., to tweet, “The White House is running a two for one special today on deep state leakers.”

Defense Secretary Mark Esper was asked what the Pentagon would do to ensure that Vindman faces no retribution. “We protect all of our service members from retribution or anything like that,” Esper said. “We’ve already addressed that in policy and other means.”

Alexander Vindman is scheduled to enter a military college in Washington, D.C., this summer, and his brother is to be assigned to the Army General Counsel’s Office, according to two officials who were not authorized to discuss the matter publicly and so spoke on condition of anonymity.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Central Florida News

FL NOW PAC Endorses Eric Gray, Jane Aman, Felipe Sousa-Lazaballet and Samuel Vilchez-Santiago in Florida House Races

Published

on

A view of the historic Old Florida State Capitol building, which sits in front of the current New Capitol, on November 10, 2018 in Tallahassee, Florida. (Mark Wallheiser/Getty Images)

ORLANDO, Fla. (FNN NEWS) — FL NOW PAC has announced endorsements in four Florida House races, backing Eric Gray in House District 35, Dr. Jane Aman in District 37, Felipe Sousa-Lazaballet in District 42 and Samuel Vilchez-Santiago in District 43.

The political action committee said the endorsements were based on candidates’ responses to a questionnaire examining issues including women’s rights, women’s equality, LGBTQIA+ rights, reproductive health care, racial justice and economic justice.

According to FL NOW PAC, the candidates demonstrated support for policy priorities associated with the National Organization for Women.

“FL NOW PAC believes these candidates are ready to tackle critical issues affecting our communities especially affordability in housing, cost of living, insurance, Medicaid and SNAP, providing critical support to millions of Floridians,” FL NOW PAC President Julie Kent said in the endorsement announcement.

The PAC also said the endorsed candidates would support what it described as efforts to protect constitutional rights, democratic institutions and ethical government.

Eric Gray — Florida House District 35

FL NOW PAC endorsed Eric Gray in Florida House District 35, highlighting his work as executive director of the Christian Service Center for Central Florida.

According to the organization, Gray’s campaign priorities include affordable housing, strengthening public education, reproductive rights and voting access.

The PAC said Gray has also expressed concerns about policies that could disproportionately affect voting access in marginalized communities.

Dr. Jane Aman — Florida House District 37

Dr. Jane Aman received the PAC’s endorsement in Florida House District 37.

FL NOW PAC described Aman as a University of Central Florida lecturer and longtime community organizer with a record of advocacy involving marginalized communities.

According to the endorsement announcement, Aman’s campaign priorities include affordability, education, reproductive health care access and protection of the rural boundary.

Felipe Sousa-Lazaballet — Florida House District 42

FL NOW PAC endorsed Felipe Sousa-Lazaballet in Florida House District 42.

The organization highlighted Sousa-Lazaballet’s background as an immigrant and LGBTQ+ Floridian and said his professional work has focused on expanding opportunity and advancing inclusive policies.

According to the PAC, his “Thriving Together Agenda” includes expanding access to affordable health care.

The organization also cited his support for reproductive rights, contraception access, maternal care and programs serving people with disabilities.

Samuel Vilchez-Santiago — Florida House District 43

FL NOW PAC endorsed Samuel Vilchez-Santiago in Florida House District 43, saying his campaign emphasizes affordability, public education, democracy, reproductive rights and women’s access to health care.

According to the PAC, Vilchez-Santiago has framed his campaign around “putting people over politics” and expanding opportunities for residents.

The endorsement announcement said his priorities were shaped by his personal experience growing up in the community and include lowering costs for Florida families and strengthening public schools.

FL NOW PAC Outlines Endorsement Criteria

FL NOW PAC said candidates seeking its support were evaluated through a questionnaire addressing several of the organization’s principal policy areas.

Those issues included freedom from violence against women, racial justice, reproductive health care, economic justice and constitutional equality.

The organization said its endorsed candidates best represented its political and policy priorities heading into the 2026 election.

 

Continue Reading

Florida

FL NOW PAC Backs Angie Gallo, Melissa Vickers and Gloria Pickar for Orange County School Board

Published

on

ORLANDO, Fla. (FNN NEWS) — FL NOW PAC has announced endorsements in several Orange County School Board races, citing candidates’ positions on public education, women’s rights, equality, LGBTQIA+ rights and other issues prioritized by the organization.

According to the PAC, candidates seeking its endorsement completed a questionnaire addressing policy areas tied to the National Organization for Women’s issue platform, including freedom from violence against women, racial justice, reproductive health care, economic justice and constitutional equality.

“FL NOW PAC believes these candidates are ready to tackle critical issues affecting our communities especially affordability in housing, cost of living, insurance, Medicaid and SNAP, providing critical support to millions of Floridians,” FL NOW PAC President Julie Kent said in the organization’s announcement.

The PAC said it believes its endorsed candidates will support public education, democratic institutions and policies aligned with the organization’s priorities.

Angie Gallo

FL NOW PAC highlighted Angie Gallo’s support for public education, diversity, student empowerment, higher teacher pay and increased resources for teachers and students.

Gallo has served eight years on the Orange County School Board representing District 1, according to the PAC’s announcement.

The organization said Gallo supports the right of all students to receive an education and emphasized her experience on the board as part of its endorsement.

Melissa Vickers

FL NOW PAC also endorsed Melissa Vickers, describing her as a Florida A&M University College of Law graduate, Edgewater High School alumna, Latina and mother of two.

Vickers is executive director and co-founder of the Orlando Center for Justice, an organization focused on legal services and access to justice.

According to FL NOW PAC, Vickers has centered her professional work on helping families access opportunities and protecting their legal rights.

Gloria Pickar

The PAC also announced its support for Gloria Pickar, noting her legal education and focus on issues affecting families experiencing economic hardship.

According to the endorsement announcement, Pickar earned her law degree from the University of Florida with a concentration in poverty research.

FL NOW PAC said Pickar’s campaign emphasizes academic achievement, school safety, educator support and preparing students for success beyond the classroom.

The organization said Pickar wants Orange County Public Schools to focus on measurable student outcomes and strengthening public schools.

FL NOW PAC Outlines Endorsement Priorities

FL NOW PAC said its endorsement process focuses on candidates whose positions align with the organization’s priorities involving women’s equality, civil rights, economic justice and public education.

The PAC also said its endorsed candidates support what it described as efforts to defend constitutional principles and address ethical concerns in government.

The endorsements represent FL NOW PAC’s latest involvement in local Orange County elections as candidates compete for seats overseeing one of Florida’s largest public school systems.

Continue Reading

Florida

ActBlue Investigations Raises Vetting, Due-Diligence Questions for Samuel Vilchez Santiago’s Florida House Endorsers

Published

on

Two ActBlue employees hold key roles in a Florida House campaign and supporting PAC that raised about $217,000 combined, raising questions about what endorsers knew before recommending the candidate to voters

ORLANDO, Fla. (FNN NEWS) — Continuing national scrutiny surrounding Democratic fundraising platform ActBlue is intersecting with a Florida House race, raising questions about candidate vetting, endorsement due diligence and what voters should know before casting their ballots.

Samuel Vilchez Santiago, a Democratic candidate for Florida House District 43, identifies himself as a PACs and nonprofits senior manager at ActBlue. His campaign treasurer, José Gamboa, also works for ActBlue as an account management specialist while simultaneously serving in leadership and financial roles with Central Floridians for Change, a political committee supporting Vilchez Santiago.

Together, Vilchez Santiago’s campaign and the supporting PAC have raised approximately $217,000 — about $155,000 by the campaign and $62,000 by Central Floridians for Change, according to campaign-finance records reviewed by Florida National News.

Central Floridians for Change contributed $50,000 to the Florida House Democratic Campaign Committee in July. The House Democratic committee subsequently participated in political advertising supporting Vilchez Santiago, according to a mailer distributed to District 43 voters and reviewed by FNN. The mailer’s disclaimer states that it was approved by Vilchez Santiago.

At the same time, Vilchez Santiago’s campaign website displays an extensive endorsement network of political and advocacy organizations, labor unions and current and former elected officials.

Those relationships do not establish wrongdoing by Vilchez Santiago, Gamboa, ActBlue or either political committee.

But against the backdrop of continuing congressional and federal scrutiny involving ActBlue, they raise legitimate questions about transparency, political fundraising and the level of due diligence conducted before influential organizations and public officials recommended Vilchez Santiago to voters.

 

FNN News Graphic


Why Vetting and Due Diligence Matter to Voters

Political endorsements are intended to influence elections.

When members of Congress, mayors, state legislators, constitutional officers, labor unions and national advocacy organizations publicly recommend a candidate, they put their names and reputations behind that recommendation.

That makes the process preceding an endorsement relevant to voters.

A comprehensive vetting process can examine a candidate’s professional history, financial relationships, campaign-finance records, potential conflicts, public statements and other information relevant to holding public office.

But an endorsement alone does not establish that such a review occurred.

An endorsement tells voters whom an organization or political leader supports. Due diligence tells voters how carefully that recommendation was made.

That distinction takes on greater significance when a candidate’s employer is simultaneously facing federal and congressional investigations.

ActBlue Faces Continuing National Scrutiny

ActBlue has faced extensive congressional scrutiny involving its online political fundraising operations.

Republican-led investigations by the U.S. House Judiciary Committee, Committee on House Administration and House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform have examined allegations involving fraud prevention, donor verification, potentially prohibited foreign contributions and internal compliance practices.

Congressional investigators have subpoenaed ActBlue records and sought testimony from current and former employees.

Federal scrutiny expanded after President Donald Trump’s April 24, 2025, presidential memorandum directed the attorney general to investigate allegations involving online fundraising platforms and potentially unlawful political contributions.

The existence of congressional or federal investigations does not establish that allegations against ActBlue have been proven.

ActBlue has disputed allegations of wrongdoing and maintained that it complies with federal campaign-finance laws.

Congressional Investigators Have Examined ActBlue Employees

The role and knowledge of ActBlue employees have become part of the congressional investigation.

House investigators have subpoenaed current and former employees for depositions based on their responsibilities and potential knowledge of ActBlue’s internal operations.

In April 2026, three House committees released a second joint interim staff report addressing ActBlue. Congressional investigators reported that five current or former ActBlue employees invoked their Fifth Amendment rights a combined 146 times during depositions.

Invoking the Fifth Amendment is a constitutional right and does not establish guilt.

There is also an important distinction involving the two ActBlue employees connected to the Florida House race.

Florida National News has identified no public evidence that Vilchez Santiago or Gamboa has been charged with wrongdoing, publicly identified as a target or subject of a federal criminal investigation, or publicly named as subjects of the congressional ActBlue investigations.

Their employment at ActBlue does not establish wrongdoing.

But because investigators have focused on what certain ActBlue employees knew and what responsibilities they held, the professional roles of Vilchez Santiago and Gamboa become relevant to understanding the Florida connection to the national story.

ActBlue PACs and Nonprofits Senior Manager Samuel Vilchez Santiago, a former Orange County Democratic Party chair and candidate for Florida House District 43. Photo Credit: Samuel Vilchez Santiago

Vilchez Santiago Says He Helps ‘Thousands’ Through ActBlue

Vilchez Santiago openly promotes his ActBlue employment as part of his professional qualifications.

His campaign website states:

“As a Senior Nonprofit Manager at ActBlue, he helps thousands of nonprofits and grassroots movements across the country build people-powered fundraising programs that shift political influence away from corporations and toward communities.”

The statement portrays a broad professional role involving fundraising programs for organizations across the country.

It does not establish that Vilchez Santiago works in ActBlue’s fraud-prevention, donor-verification, legal or compliance operations.

But because Vilchez Santiago himself emphasizes the scale of his responsibilities, the precise nature of that work is relevant to understanding whether his duties overlap with areas receiving congressional or federal scrutiny.

 

José Gamboa, an ActBlue account management specialist, serves as Vilchez Santiago’s campaign treasurer. He is also Central Floridians for Change’s chairman and treasurer, while records list him as its registered agent. Photo Credit: Jose Gamboa

 

Second ActBlue Employee Holds Key Campaign and PAC Roles

The ActBlue connection extends beyond Vilchez Santiago.

José Gamboa, an ActBlue account management specialist, serves as Vilchez Santiago’s campaign treasurer.

Gamboa also holds multiple positions with Central Floridians for Change, the political committee supporting Vilchez Santiago.

Campaign-finance records identify Gamboa as the committee’s chairman and treasurer, while records also list him as its registered agent.

That places two ActBlue employees in significant positions surrounding the same Florida House race:

Vilchez Santiago — ActBlue senior nonprofit manager and Florida House candidate.

Gamboa — ActBlue account management specialist, Vilchez Santiago campaign treasurer and chairman, treasurer and registered agent of Central Floridians for Change.

The overlapping roles are not evidence of misconduct.

They are, however, relevant facts for organizations and elected officials conducting candidate due diligence.

Campaign and Supporting PAC Raised About $217,000

Campaign-finance records reviewed by FNN show:

Vilchez Santiago campaign: approximately $155,000

Central Floridians for Change: approximately $62,000

Combined: approximately $217,000

The campaign and political committee are legally separate entities. The combined figure is used to illustrate the financial scale surrounding the candidate campaign and PAC supporting him.

Gamboa holds key financial positions involving both entities.

PAC Sent $50,000 to Florida House Democratic Campaign Committee

Central Floridians for Change contributed $50,000 to the Florida House Democratic Campaign Committee in July 2026, according to campaign-finance records reviewed by FNN.

The money was reported through three contributions:

$25,000

$15,000

$10,000

The contributions totaled $50,000.

Compared with the approximately $62,000 raised by Central Floridians for Change, the transfer represents roughly 81% of the PAC’s fundraising.

The contribution does not establish an improper transaction.

It does establish a substantial financial relationship between the Vilchez Santiago-supporting political committee and the Democratic political committee responsible for helping elect candidates to the Florida House.

House Democratic Committee Subsequently Supported Vilchez Santiago

The financial relationship was followed by political activity in House District 43.

A mailer distributed to District 43 voters and reviewed by FNN identifies the Florida House Democratic Campaign Committee in its political-advertisement disclaimer and communicates support for Vilchez Santiago and other Democratic candidates.

The disclaimer states that the advertisement was approved by Samuel Vilchez Santiago, Democrat, for state representative.

The documented sequence is significant:

Central Floridians for Change raised approximately $62,000 → transferred $50,000 to the Florida House Democratic Campaign Committee → the House Democratic committee subsequently participated in political advertising supporting Vilchez Santiago → the mailer states it was approved by Vilchez Santiago.

That sequence does not establish a quid pro quo, illegal coordination or campaign-finance violation.

It does establish a financial and political relationship that is relevant to understanding the network surrounding the District 43 campaign.

FNN Fact-Check Rated Mailer Claim ‘Mostly False’

Florida National News separately fact-checked a specific claim contained in the Florida House Democratic Campaign Committee mailer and rated that claim “Mostly False.”

The rating applies only to the specific statement examined by FNN and should not be interpreted as a finding that every statement contained in the mailer was false.

Because the advertisement’s disclaimer states that it was approved by Vilchez Santiago, the accuracy of its claims is relevant to voters evaluating both the advertisement and the candidate.

FNN’s separate fact-check details the evidence supporting the rating.

Photo Credit: Samuel Vilchez Santiago

Extensive Endorsements Put Due Diligence in Focus

Vilchez Santiago’s campaign website displays dozens of endorsements from political and advocacy organizations, labor unions and current and former elected officials.

The campaign lists support from organizations including Equality Florida Action PAC, Latino Victory Fund, SEIU Florida, Orange County Fire Fighters Association, Florida NOW, Giffords PAC, Run for Something, LGBTQ+ Victory Fund, Florida Rising, Florida AFL-CIO, Central Florida AFL-CIO, Florida Education Association and United Auto Workers, among others.

Federal political figures listed by the campaign include U.S. Reps. Darren Soto and Maxwell Frost and former U.S. Rep. Gabrielle Giffords.

Florida political figures listed include Democratic legislative leaders, state senators and representatives, along with Central Florida officials including Orange County Mayor Jerry Demings and Orlando Mayor Buddy Dyer.

The number and prominence of those endorsements demonstrate substantial institutional political support.

They do not, by themselves, reveal the extent of the vetting conducted before those endorsements were issued.

What Did Endorsers Know?

The national ActBlue scrutiny and the Florida campaign-finance relationships create several basic due-diligence questions.

Were endorsers aware that Vilchez Santiago worked as a senior manager for ActBlue?

Did they examine the scope of his responsibilities?

Did they know his campaign treasurer also worked for ActBlue and simultaneously controlled key financial functions for Central Floridians for Change?

Did they review the approximately $217,000 raised by the campaign and supporting PAC?

Were they aware of the $50,000 transfer to the Florida House Democratic Campaign Committee and the subsequent political advertising supporting Vilchez Santiago?

And were they aware of the congressional and federal scrutiny involving ActBlue before lending their names to his candidacy?

Those questions do not presume that an endorsement was improper.

They address something voters cannot determine simply by looking at a campaign endorsement page:

What due diligence occurred before the endorsement?

Why It Matters to Florida Voters

The national ActBlue controversy may appear removed from a Florida House primary.

In District 43, the connections are direct.

An ActBlue senior manager is seeking election to the Florida Legislature.

Another ActBlue employee manages his campaign finances while simultaneously holding leadership and financial positions with a PAC supporting him.

The campaign and PAC raised approximately $217,000 combined.

The PAC transferred $50,000 to the Florida House Democratic Campaign Committee.

That committee subsequently participated in political advertising supporting the ActBlue-employed candidate.

Meanwhile, dozens of organizations and current and former elected officials are asking voters to support Vilchez Santiago.

None of those facts establishes wrongdoing.

But voters are entitled to understand not only who endorsed a candidate, but what those endorsers knew before they made that recommendation.

Vetting matters. Due diligence matters. And when influential political figures and organizations use their credibility to influence voters, the process behind their endorsements matters, too.

Democrats’ Poli

Florida House District 43 Democratic Race Plagued by Controversies Ahead of 2026 Primary Election

What Comes Next: FNN Will Seek Answers

Florida National News will continue examining the intersection between ActBlue, its employees, the Vilchez Santiago campaign, Central Floridians for Change and the Florida House Democratic Campaign Committee.

As part of a follow-up report, FNN plans to seek responses from ActBlue, Samuel Vilchez Santiago, José Gamboa and the Florida House Democratic Campaign Committee, as well as political organizations and current and former elected officials who endorsed Vilchez Santiago.

FNN will ask ActBlue to clarify the professional responsibilities of Vilchez Santiago and Gamboa, including whether their positions involve nonprofit organizations, PACs, political committees or accounts connected with Florida political activity.

Vilchez Santiago and Gamboa will be asked about their overlapping ActBlue, campaign and political committee roles and whether ActBlue maintains policies governing employees who simultaneously participate in campaigns or political committees.

The Florida House Democratic Campaign Committee will be asked about the $50,000 received from Central Floridians for Change, its subsequent political advertising supporting Vilchez Santiago and the process surrounding the mailer approved by the candidate.

FNN will also ask major endorsers what vetting and due diligence they conducted before recommending Vilchez Santiago to District 43 voters and whether they reviewed his ActBlue employment and the campaign-finance relationships documented in this report.

The responses — including which organizations and officials respond, what they say they reviewed and how they explain their decisions — will be examined in a subsequent Florida National News report.

For voters, that follow-up could help answer the central question raised by the extensive endorsement network:

What did endorsers know, what did they review and how much due diligence occurred before they asked District 43 voters to trust their recommendation?

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Advertisement Ticket Time Machine ad
Advertisement Orlando Regional REALTOR Association logo
Advertisement Parts Pass App
Advertisement Hispanic Chamber of Commerce of Metro Orlando
Advertisement
Advertisement African American Chamber of Commerce of Central Florida
Advertisement FNN News en Español
Advertisement Indian American Chamber of Commerce logo
Advertisement Florida Sports Channel

FNN Newsletter

Trending