Connect with us

Politics

Payback: Trump Ousts Officials Who Testified on Impeachment

Published

on

FILE - In this Wednesday, Nov. 20, 2019, file photo, U.S. Ambassador to the European Union Gordon Sondland testifies before the House Intelligence Committee on Capitol Hill in Washington, during a public impeachment hearing of President Donald Trump's efforts to tie U.S. aid for Ukraine to investigations of his political opponents. President Donald Trump has ousted Sondland, who gave damaging testimony in impeachment inquiry. (AP Photo/Andrew Harnik, File)

WASHINGTON (AP) — Exacting swift punishment against those who crossed him, an emboldened President Donald Trump on Friday ousted two government officials who had delivered damaging testimony against him during his impeachment hearings. The president took retribution just two days after his acquittal by the Senate.

First came news that Trump had ousted Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman, the decorated soldier and national security aide who played a central role in the Democrats’ impeachment case. Vindman’s lawyer said his client was escorted out of the White House complex Friday, told to leave in retaliation for “telling the truth.”

“The truth has cost Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman his job, his career, and his privacy,” attorney David Pressman said in a statement. Vindman’s twin brother, Lt. Col. Yevgeny Vindman, also was asked to leave his job as a White House lawyer on Friday, the Army said in a statement. Both men were reassigned to the Army.

Next came word that Gordon Sondland, Trump’s ambassador to the European Union, also was out.

“I was advised today that the President intends to recall me effective immediately as United States Ambassador to the European Union,” Sondland said in a statement.

The White House had not been coy about whether Trump would retaliate against those he viewed as foes in the impeachment drama. White House press secretary Stephanie Grisham said Thursday that Trump was glad it was over and “maybe people should pay for that.”

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said in a statement that Vindman’s ouster was “a clear and brazen act of retaliation that showcases the President’s fear of the truth. The President’s vindictiveness is precisely what led Republican Senators to be accomplices to his cover-up.”

Rep. Jackie Speier, D-Calif., called it “the Friday Night Massacre,” likening the situation to President Richard Nixon’s so-called Saturday night massacre, when top Justice Department officials resigned after refusing to do his bidding by firing a special prosecutor investigating the Watergate scandal. (The prosecutor himself was fired anyway.)

Speier added in her tweet, “I’m sure Trump is fuming that he can’t fire Pelosi.”

Senate Republicans, who just two days prior acquitted Trump of charges he abused his office, were silent Friday evening. Many of them had reacted with indignation during the Senate trial when Democratic Rep. Adam Schiff, the lead prosecutor, suggested Trump would be out for revenge against the lawmakers who crossed him during impeachment.

Since his acquittal, Trump has held nothing back in lashing out at his critics, including Sen. Mitt Romney of Utah, the only Republican to vote against him. On Friday, he also took after Sen. Joe Manchin, a moderate Democrat from West Virginia whom Trump had hoped would vote with the Republicans for his acquittal but who ended up voting to convict.

Trump tweeted that he was “very surprised & disappointed” with Manchin’s votes, claiming no president had done more for his state. He added that Manchin was “just a puppet” for the Democratic leaders in the House and Senate.

It was Alexander Vindman who first told the House that in America “right matters” — a phrase repeated in the impeachment trial by lead prosecutor Schiff.

Sondland, too, was a crucial witness in the House impeachment inquiry, telling investigators that “Everyone was in the loop” on Trump’s desire to press Ukraine for politically charged investigations. He told lawmakers how he came to understand that there was a “quid pro quo” connecting a desired White House visit for Ukraine’s leader and an announcement that the country would conduct the investigations the president wanted.

Sondland “chose to be terminated rather than resign,” according to a U.S. official who spoke on condition of anonymity because they had not been authorized to discuss the matter publicly.

Alexander Vindman’s lawyer issued a one-page statement that accused Trump of taking revenge on his client.

“He did what any member of our military is charged with doing every day: he followed orders, he obeyed his oath, and he served his country, even when doing so was fraught with danger and personal peril,” Pressman said. “And for that, the most powerful man in the world — buoyed by the silent, the pliable, and the complicit — has decided to exact revenge.”

The White House did not respond to Pressman’s accusation. “We do not comment on personnel matters,” said John Ullyot, spokesman for the National Security Council, the foreign policy arm of the White House where Vindman was an expert on Ukraine.

The Democrats angling to replace Trump took notice of Vindman’s ouster during their evening debate in Manchester, New Hampshire. Former Vice President Joe Biden asked the audience to stand and applaud the lieutenant colonel.

Vindman’s status had been uncertain since he testified that he didn’t think it was “proper” for Trump to “demand that a foreign government investigate” former Vice President Joe Biden and his son’s dealings with the energy company Burisma in Ukraine. Vindman’s ouster, however, seemed imminent after Trump mocked him Thursday during his post-acquittal celebration with Republican supporters in the East Room and said Friday that he was not happy with him.

“You think I’m supposed to be happy with him?” Trump told reporters on the South Lawn of the White House. “I’m not. … They are going to be making that decision.”

Vindman, a 20-year Army veteran, wore his uniform full of medals, including a purple heart, when he appeared late last year for what turned out to be a testy televised impeachment hearing. Trump supporters raised questions about the immigrant’s allegiance to the United States — his parents fled the Soviet Union when he was a child —and noted that he had received offers to work for the government of Ukraine, offers Vindman said he swiftly dismissed.

In gripping testimony, Vindman told the House of his family’s story, his father bringing them to the U.S. some 40 years ago.

“Dad, my sitting here today in the U.S. Capitol, talking to our elected officials, is proof that you made the right decision 40 years ago to leave the Soviet Union and come here to United States of America in search of a better life for our family,” he testified. “Do not worry, I will be fine for telling the truth.”’

Hillary Clinton, the 2016 Democratic presidential nominee, recalled Vindman’s testimony that he would be fine and tweeted, “It’s appalling that this administration may prove him wrong.”

Some of Trump’s backers cheered Vindman’s removal.

Rep. Lee Zeldin, R-N.Y., tweeted that Vindman “should not be inside the National Security Council any longer. It’s not about retaliation. It’s because he cannot be trusted, he disagrees with the President’s policies, & his term there is coming to an end regardless.”

News that both Vindman twins had been ousted led Rep. Paul Gosar, R-Ariz., to tweet, “The White House is running a two for one special today on deep state leakers.”

Defense Secretary Mark Esper was asked what the Pentagon would do to ensure that Vindman faces no retribution. “We protect all of our service members from retribution or anything like that,” Esper said. “We’ve already addressed that in policy and other means.”

Alexander Vindman is scheduled to enter a military college in Washington, D.C., this summer, and his brother is to be assigned to the Army General Counsel’s Office, according to two officials who were not authorized to discuss the matter publicly and so spoke on condition of anonymity.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Crimes and Courts

DOJ Charges Five in Pennsylvania, New Jersey and Wisconsin in Alleged Illegal Voting, Voter Registration Cases

Published

on

WASHINGTON (FNN) — Five people in Pennsylvania, New Jersey and Wisconsin face federal charges in separate cases involving alleged illegal voting, false claims of U.S. citizenship or fraudulent voter registration connected to the 2022 or 2024 elections, according to the U.S. Department of Justice.

The Justice Department announced the charges Friday, Sept. 4, saying the defendants include four non-U.S. citizens accused of illegally voting and one U.S. citizen accused of aiding and abetting election-related offenses.

The cases were brought in the Middle District of Pennsylvania, District of New Jersey and Western District of Wisconsin.

DOJ: Election Fraud Will Be Prosecuted

Attorney General Todd Blanche said in the DOJ announcement that election integrity is fundamental to American democracy and emphasized that voting in federal elections is limited to eligible U.S. citizens.

“Election fraud is a serious crime, and it is the duty of the Department of Justice to treat it as such,” Blanche said.

FBI Director Kash Patel said the bureau considers election integrity a priority and would investigate credible allegations of election fraud and illegal voting.

Federal officials also emphasized that the charges are allegations and have not resulted in findings of guilt.

Pennsylvania: Three People Charged

According to the Justice Department, Thomas Holtzman, 68, and his wife, Marisol Guzman, 50, both of Carlisle, Pennsylvania, were indicted by a federal grand jury in connection with allegations that Guzman illegally voted as a non-U.S. citizen in the 2024 election.

DOJ said Guzman was charged with voting as an alien.

Holtzman, a U.S. citizen, was charged with making a false statement of citizenship in order to vote and aiding and abetting, as well as fraudulent registration and aiding and abetting, according to federal prosecutors.

In a separate Pennsylvania case, Katya Rodriguez, 30, a Mexican national living in Harrisburg, was indicted by a federal grand jury on charges related to alleged illegal voting in the 2024 election.

According to DOJ, Rodriguez was charged with making a false statement of citizenship in order to vote, fraudulent registration and voting as an alien.

If convicted, Holtzman faces a statutory maximum of 10 years in prison, Guzman up to one year and Rodriguez up to 11 years, according to the Justice Department. Any sentence would be determined by a federal judge based on applicable law and federal sentencing guidelines.

Homeland Security Investigations investigated the Pennsylvania cases, DOJ said.

New Jersey: Federal Complaint Alleges Noncitizen Voted in 2024 Primary

In New Jersey, Mercedes Alexandra Cardoso of Union County was charged with voting by an alien in a federal election, according to the Justice Department.

The federal complaint alleges Cardoso was not a U.S. citizen when she registered through the New Jersey Division of Elections’ Online Voter Registration System.

According to prosecutors, Cardoso falsely certified on her voter registration application that she was a U.S. citizen.

DOJ said Cardoso allegedly cast a ballot in the June 2024 primary election, which included candidates seeking federal office.

Federal prosecutors said Cardoso entered the United States from Ecuador on a B-2 visa and was not a U.S. citizen when she allegedly voted.

If convicted, Cardoso faces a statutory maximum of one year in prison. Her initial court appearance was scheduled for Sept. 8, according to DOJ.

The FBI, Homeland Security Investigations and U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services investigated the case.

Wisconsin: 2022 Election Vote Leads to Federal Charge

In Wisconsin, Jesus Javier Jurado Garcia, 25, a Mexican national living in Beloit, was charged Sept. 2 with illegally voting as an alien in the November 2022 election, according to the Justice Department.

A federal criminal information alleges Jurado Garcia knew he was not a U.S. citizen when he voted on Nov. 8, 2022, in an election that included races for the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives.

If convicted, Jurado Garcia faces a statutory maximum sentence of one year in prison, DOJ said.

Federal Officials Emphasize Election-Law Enforcement

U.S. attorneys in all three jurisdictions used the announcement to emphasize federal enforcement of election laws.

U.S. Attorney Brian Miller for the Middle District of Pennsylvania said his office would prosecute people accused of illegally voting in federal elections as well as those accused of facilitating illegal voting.

U.S. Attorney Robert Frazer for the District of New Jersey said the federal government has a responsibility to safeguard elections and investigate alleged violations of federal election law.

U.S. Attorney Chadwick M. Elgersma for the Western District of Wisconsin similarly said his office is committed to enforcing federal election laws.

Homeland Security Investigations also said its agents worked with federal partners to investigate the alleged conduct and support the prosecutions.

Charges Remain Allegations

The cases are at the charging stage.

A criminal complaint, indictment or information contains allegations and does not establish that a defendant committed a crime. All five defendants are presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law.

Continue Reading

Politics

Eight Black Major-Party Gubernatorial Nominees Head to November Ballot in Historic 2026 Election

Published

on

Five Democrats and three Republicans are competing across eight states, a remarkable milestone in a nation that has elected only three Black governors

WASHINGTON (FNN) — Eight Black major-party nominees are running for governor across the United States in the 2026 general election, creating an unprecedented moment in American gubernatorial politics.

The field spans both major parties and eight states: Florida, Georgia, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, South Carolina and Wisconsin. Five nominees are Democrats and three are Republicans. Seven are seeking to become the first Black governor elected in their respective states, while Maryland Gov. Wes Moore is seeking reelection.

The number is particularly striking because only three Black Americans have ever been elected governor: Douglas Wilder of Virginia, Deval Patrick of Massachusetts and Moore of Maryland. All three are Democrats and men.

That means more than twice as many Black major-party gubernatorial nominees are competing in 2026 alone as the total number of Black Americans ever elected governor.

Eight Black major-party nominees are running for governor across eight states in the November 2026 general election: Keisha Lance Bottoms (D-Georgia), David Crowley (D-Wisconsin), Byron Donalds (R-Florida), Lisa Demuth (R-Minnesota), Aaron Ford (D-Nevada), John James (R-Michigan), Jermaine Johnson (D-South Carolina) and Wes Moore (D-Maryland). Moore is seeking reelection, while the other seven could become the first Black governors elected in their respective states. Source Florida National News (FNN)

Why It Matters: Eight Nominees, Only Three Black Governors Elected

Governors occupy some of the most powerful elected positions in American government, overseeing state agencies and budgets while exercising authority over legislation, appointments and executive policy.

Yet Black representation in governors’ mansions has remained exceptionally rare.

Wilder became the nation’s first elected Black governor when Virginia voters elected him in 1989. Patrick followed in Massachusetts in 2006. Moore became the third with his Maryland victory in 2022. Moore is currently the nation’s only Black governor.

The 2026 field could significantly expand that history — and potentially establish several additional firsts.

Either Keisha Lance Bottoms or Lisa Demuth could become the first Black woman elected governor in U.S. history. Republican nominees Byron Donalds, John James and Demuth also represent the possibility of another gubernatorial milestone.

But the candidates do not represent a single political movement. Their backgrounds, ideologies and policy positions differ substantially.

That distinction is central to understanding the significance of 2026: Black representation at the gubernatorial level is appearing across party and ideological lines.

Meet the Eight Black Major-Party Nominees

Byron Donalds — Florida — Republican

Former U.S. Rep. Byron Donalds won Florida’s Republican gubernatorial nomination Aug. 18 and is seeking to succeed term-limited Gov. Ron DeSantis.

Donalds previously served in the Florida House before his election to Congress representing Southwest Florida. A prominent conservative and ally of President Donald Trump, Donalds faces Democratic nominee and former Republican U.S. Rep. David Jolly in November. Florida election records confirm the Donalds-Jolly general-election matchup.

If elected, Donalds would become Florida’s first Black governor.

Wes Moore — Maryland — Democrat

Wes Moore is the only incumbent governor among the eight nominees.

An Army veteran, Rhodes Scholar, author and former nonprofit executive, Moore was elected in 2022, becoming Maryland’s first Black governor and only the third Black American elected governor of any state.

He is seeking a second term.

Keisha Lance Bottoms — Georgia — Democrat

Former Atlanta Mayor Keisha Lance Bottoms is the Democratic nominee in Georgia.

Bottoms served as Atlanta mayor from 2018 to 2022 and later served in President Joe Biden’s administration. She faces Republican Rick Jackson in November.

A Bottoms victory would make her Georgia’s first Black governor and could make her the nation’s first Black woman elected governor.

John James — Michigan — Republican

John James, a businessman, Army veteran and former member of Congress, is Michigan’s Republican gubernatorial nominee.

James previously mounted two campaigns for the U.S. Senate before winning election to the U.S. House in 2022. He faces Democratic nominee Jocelyn Benson in November.

A James victory would make him Michigan’s first Black governor.

Lisa Demuth — Minnesota — Republican

Minnesota Republican Lisa Demuth entered the 2026 campaign with a history of breaking political barriers in her state.

Demuth, a business owner and state lawmaker, became Minnesota’s first Black House speaker. She defeated a Republican primary field that included MyPillow founder Mike Lindell and now faces Democratic U.S. Sen. Amy Klobuchar in the general election.

If elected, Demuth would become Minnesota’s first Black governor and could become the first Black woman elected governor in U.S. history.

Aaron Ford — Nevada — Democrat

Nevada Attorney General Aaron Ford is the Democratic nominee for governor.

Ford previously served as majority leader of the Nevada Senate and became Nevada’s first Black attorney general. He is challenging incumbent Republican Gov. Joe Lombardo.

A victory would make Ford Nevada’s first Black governor.

David Crowley — Wisconsin — Democrat

David Crowley, the Milwaukee County executive and a former Wisconsin state representative, won the Democratic gubernatorial nomination after a closely contested primary.

Crowley became the first Black person elected Milwaukee County executive in 2020. He faces Republican Tom Tiffany in November.

If elected, Crowley would become Wisconsin’s first Black governor.

Jermaine Johnson — South Carolina — Democrat

South Carolina state Rep. Jermaine Johnson is the Democratic nominee for governor.

Johnson has served in the South Carolina House since 2020 and is seeking the state’s highest executive office.

If elected, Johnson would become South Carolina’s first Black elected governor.

Five Democrats, Three Republicans — And Different Political Visions

The historic nature of the field should not obscure its political diversity.

Democrats: Wes Moore, Keisha Lance Bottoms, Aaron Ford, David Crowley and Jermaine Johnson.

Republicans: Byron Donalds, John James and Lisa Demuth.

The candidates differ on major questions of taxation, abortion, education, voting laws, health care, economic policy and the role of state government.

AP reported that many of the candidates have not made race the centerpiece of their campaigns, instead emphasizing their qualifications, policies and governing priorities.

Their shared place in history therefore should not be interpreted as shared politics.

Florida’s History: Andrew Gillum Came Close in 2018

Florida has faced the possibility of electing its first Black governor before.

In 2018, Tallahassee Mayor Andrew Gillum, a Democrat, faced Republican Ron DeSantis in the general election.

Gillum came remarkably close to making history. DeSantis ultimately prevailed by roughly 32,000 votes out of more than 8 million cast, a margin of less than half a percentage point.

Gillum’s defeat left Florida without a Black governor.

Eight years later, the possibility has returned from the opposite side of the political aisle.

Donalds won the Republican nomination with 811,131 votes, or 47.79%, in the Aug. 18 primary, according to official Florida election results. Jolly captured 60.95% of the Democratic primary vote.

The historical connection between Gillum and Donalds is narrow but significant: they represent different parties, political philosophies and eras, but both became major-party nominees with an opportunity to become Florida’s first Black governor.

2026 Could Produce Several Historic Firsts

The November elections could substantially rewrite the history of Black gubernatorial representation.

Seven nominees could become the first Black governor elected in their states. Bottoms or Demuth could become America’s first Black woman elected governor. Moore could win another term as Maryland’s first Black governor.

The outcomes will ultimately depend on voters evaluating each candidate individually — their records, policies, qualifications and visions for their states.

Historical significance does not determine an election result.

A National Milestone Before November Votes Are Counted

Whatever voters decide, 2026 has already established a milestone.

Eight Black major-party nominees are competing for governor across eight states in the same general-election cycle — more than twice the number of Black Americans who have ever been elected governor.

They are Democrats and Republicans, incumbents and challengers, veterans, lawmakers, executives and attorneys. Their political philosophies differ, sometimes dramatically.

What connects them historically is much narrower — but consequential.

For the first time, American voters in eight states will simultaneously consider Black major-party nominees for governor, putting the possibility of several new chapters in American political history directly in the hands of voters this November.

Continue Reading

Florida

Byron Donalds to Speak at Trump’s Midterm Convention as Florida Democrats Target Their Political Alliance

Published

on

Florida Democrats seize on Donalds’ Dallas appearance as the Republican gubernatorial nominee heads into the general election

TALLAHASSEE, Fla. (FNN) — Republican gubernatorial nominee Byron Donalds will join President Donald Trump and other prominent Republicans at the GOP Midterm Convention in Dallas next week, prompting Florida Democrats to renew attacks on Donalds’ close political alliance with the president.

Donalds is scheduled to speak at the Sept. 9-10 gathering, according to Florida Politics. Republican National Committee Chair Joe Gruters and U.S. Rep. Anna Paulina Luna are among other Florida Republicans scheduled to participate.

The appearance comes as Trump takes an increasingly visible role in Republican efforts ahead of the November midterms. AP reports Trump has promised to campaign extensively for Republican candidates and is urging the party to run on his administration’s record despite political concerns surrounding the economy and other issues.

Florida Democrats Target Donalds’ Trump Ties

The Florida Democratic Party responded to Donalds’ scheduled appearance by seeking to make his relationship with Trump an issue in Florida’s gubernatorial campaign.

“Despite Floridians’ growing disdain for Donald Trump and the pain caused by the Byron-Trump economy, Byron Donalds is ready to remind the state of their close connection by sharing the spotlight with Trump next week,” Florida Democratic Party spokesperson Evan Ecklund said in a party news release.

Ecklund also criticized Donalds over tax and data-center policies and called him Trump’s “most-trusted puppet.”

Those descriptions are partisan characterizations from the Florida Democratic Party. They should not be read as independent findings by FNN.

Trump-Donalds Alliance Has Been Central to the Governor’s Race

Donalds and Trump have maintained a highly visible political alliance.

Trump repeatedly endorsed Donalds during Florida’s Republican gubernatorial primary, and Donalds has consistently aligned himself with Trump’s political agenda. Donalds’ appearance in Dallas extends that relationship into the general election campaign.

For Democrats, the convention provides another opportunity to connect Donalds directly to Trump.

For Republicans, the event is an opportunity to mobilize their voters and emphasize their policy agenda ahead of November.

Gruters framed the election around taxes, border security, government regulation and the economy while sharply criticizing Democratic policies.

Trump Takes a Larger Midterm Role

The Dallas gathering also comes as Trump increases his involvement in Republican midterm campaigning.

Trump has pledged to campaign for Republican candidates in competitive races around the country. AP reports that he has encouraged Republican lawmakers to emphasize his administration’s record even as the party confronts voter concerns over the economy and other national issues.

For Donalds, the convention puts Florida’s Republican nominee on a national stage alongside one of his most prominent political supporters.

For Florida Democrats, it provides another opening to argue that Trump’s record should also be part of voters’ assessment of Donalds.

That competing message — Republicans embracing Trump’s record and Democrats seeking to make that association a liability — is likely to remain part of the political debate heading toward November.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Advertisement Ticket Time Machine ad
Advertisement Orlando Regional REALTOR Association logo
Advertisement Parts Pass App
Advertisement Hispanic Chamber of Commerce of Metro Orlando
Advertisement
Advertisement African American Chamber of Commerce of Central Florida
Advertisement FNN News en Español
Advertisement Indian American Chamber of Commerce logo
Advertisement Florida Sports Channel

FNN Newsletter

Trending